We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
In recent years there has been an increasing interest in the history of the numerous houses of monks, canons and nuns which existed in the medieval British Isles, considering them in their wider socio-cultural-economic context; historians are now questioning some of the older assumptions about monastic life in the later Middle Ages, and setting new approaches and new agenda. The present volume reflects these new trends. Its fifteen chapters assess diverse aspects of monastic history, focusing on the wide range of contacts which existed between religious communities and the laity in the later medieval British Isles, covering a range of different religious orders and houses. This period has often been considered to represent a general decline of the regular life; but on the contrary, the essays here demonstrate that there remained a rich monastic culture which, although different from that of earlier centuries, remained vibrant.
CONTRIBUTORS: KAREN STOBER, JULIE KERR, EMILIA JAMROZIAK, MARTIN HEALE, COLMAN O CLABAIGH, ANDREW ABRAM, MICHAEL HICKS, JANET BURTON, KIMM PERKINS-CURRAN, JAMES CLARK, GLYN COPPACK, JENS ROHRKASTEN, SHEILA SWEETINBURGH, NICHOLAS ORME, CLAIRE CROSS
In recent years historians have begun to show renewed interest in studying ‘the material’dimensions to urban life. This shift has opened up a space for new dialogues betweenhistorians and post-medieval archaeologists working on British cities. It off ers the potentialfor reassessing approaches to studying the urban past and for experimenting withfreshmethodologies. Noting that archaeological perspectives have been largely absent from recenthistorical accounts of the modern metropolis, in this chapter we explore the potential forpursuing collaborative research that fuses archaeological evidence and thinking withotherforms of historical practice to write material histories of London. The discussion divides intothree parts. First, we sketch the post-war development of urban post-medieval archaeologyin London, and the range of archaeological collections and excavation sites that relateto the Georgian and Victorian city. Second, we consider some of the ways in which theanalysis of these sources might be used in interdisciplinary urban historiography, especiallyin the light of methodological approaches developed in North American and Australianurban archaeology. Third, we present a case study that explores how nineteenth-centuryhousehold archaeologies in London might be developed, examining some of the complexitiesand challenges of integrating archaeological methods into the study of households andlocalities in the nineteenth-century metropolis. In conclusion we consider the prospectsfor the development of interdisciplinary approaches to the material remains of London’smodern past.
INTRODUCTION
Over the course of the 17th, 18th and 19th centuries, London developed to become one of the largest and most powerful cities in the world. According to some recent historical accounts, it can be characterised as a birthplace of modernity: a city where new identities, practices and power relations were forged and experienced. London was increasingly bound into mercantile, political and social networks that were global in scope, yet at the same time its local landscapes became evermore distinctive, as dramatic demographic and economic changes transformed the city. Whether as a place of shocking social and material inequality, as a centre of industrial production, as a nexus of imperial power and commerce, or as a site for experiencing new forms of consumption, leisure and pleasure, the metropolis has long provided historians with a means of peering into and making sense of much of that which is deemed to constitute modern life.