We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Predicting radiotherapy (RT) tooth dose guides pre-RT dental management, reducing osteoradionecrosis (ORN) risk through informed extraction or treatment adjustments. This study evaluated the mean radiation dose to individual teeth for head and neck cancer (HNC) patients receiving external beam RT at the South West Wales Cancer Centre (SWWCC), to guide pre-emptive tooth extraction.
Methods:
A retrospective analysis was conducted on 158 HNC RT patients treated over a 2-year period. Patients with subsites containing ≤10 patients were excluded, and larynx cases were analysed separately before exclusion due to low ORN risk, leaving 107 patients in the final analysis. Teeth were outlined using MedCom ProSoma v4.2, and treatment plans were generated with Philips Pinnacle v16.2 using volumetric arc therapy (VMAT), without dental dose optimisation. Mean doses were reported per tooth and categorised by site, staging and tooth position, with mean and standard deviations calculated. ORN risk was defined as medium (≥40Gy) and high (≥50Gy).
Results:
Larynx patients received low mean doses (<25Gy), supporting their exclusion. Base of tongue (BoT) cases showed a dose ≥40Gy for lower ipsilateral molars in T4. Oral cavity diagnosis had the highest ORN risk, with most teeth ≥40Gy in T2+ cases and ≥50Gy in later cancer staging. The oropharynx showed some higher risk doses for T4-staging. T-tests confirmed significant dose differences between upper and lower teeth.
Conclusion:
This study provides a site-specific indicative guide for pre-RT tooth extraction based on likely dose exposure, to guide pre-radiation dental management strategies and plan optimisation decisions to reduce ORN risk.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.