Depression represents a significant challenge in terms of disability among the elderly population and its responsiveness to conventional treatment approaches tends to diminish in this population group. Esketamine has shown both effectiveness and safety in addressing treatment-resistant depression in older patients.

Currently, there is a lack of available literature regarding the use of esketamine in the treatment of patients experiencing both cognitive decline and treatment-resistant depression (TRD). We administered esketamine to a 79-year- old patient to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerance of the medication.

We recruited a 79 year old female referred to the outpatient clinics of Pavia suffering from TRD with current Severe Depressive Episode (scoring 42 on the MADRS) with cognitive impairment (MMSE 16/30). The patient was on a fourth-line treatment. First-line treatment was started with paroxetine 40 mg from september 2021 to May 2022, switched to sertraline 50 mg. Second-line treatment with quetiapine 150 mg from June 2022 to December 2022 failed, despite optimal compliance for both lines of treatment. Then third line treatment with fluoxetine 20 mg, olanzapine 10 mg was initiated from December 2022 to May 2023. Study duration was 12 weeks. Anamnestic data and psychometric (MADRS, HAMD-21, HAM-A) and cognitive (MMSE and MoCA TEST) assessment were collected from medical records at baseline (T0), one month (T1) and three month (T2) follow-ups.

MADRS, HAM-A and HAM-D values decreased significantly at T1 and T2 follow-ups. T0: MADRS 42, HAM-D 33, HAM-A 54; T1: MADRS 18, HAM-D 12, HAM-A 15; T2: MADRS 4, HAM-D 5, HAM-A 10. We also observed an improvement in cognitive test: T0: MMSE 16/30, MoCA test 4/30; T1: MMSE 18/30, MoCA test 6/30; T2: MMSE 20/30, MoCA test 8/30. The patient reported one episode of hypertension treated with clonidine after two moth of treatment, and mild prolonged motor slowing lasting about two hours after esketamine in the first month.

This case documented a successful treatment using intranasal esketamine in combination with an SSRI (Fluoxetine) for an older individual with cognitive impairment and a persistent anxiety-depressive syndrome. This approach was employed as a therapeutic intervention after multiple unsuccessful attempts with other antidepressant medications. Our findings confirmed the safety and tolerability of esketamine in an elderly female with cognitive impairment. Although a minor improvement in cognitive abilities has been noted, secondary dysfunction attributable to vascular-based cognitive decline remained. In terms of cognitive tolerance, derivatives of ketamine could potentially serve as an alternative to electroconvulsive therapy in cases of treatment-resistant depression, potentially improving short-term cognitive outcomes.

None Declared

Borderline personality disorder is often associated with comorbid conditions such as eating disorders, mood disorders, and substance use disorders. The prevalence of BPD and major depressive disorder (MDD) are about 5.9% and 8%, respectively, but up to 80% of patients with BPD experience one or more episodes of MDD in their lifetime. BPD is associated with suicidal behaviors and self-harm, thei are also fifty times more likely than the general population to attempt or die by suicide, Up to 10% of BPD patients will die by suicide

Our aim is to verify if Esketamine could be effectiveness in treating patterns of behavior that have proven to be socially disruptive like self harm, suicidal attempts in patients with BPD. Suicidal ideation is a major risk factor for suicide in patients with TRD and BPD. The interval between the onset of suicidal ideation and suicide attempt is often very short, highlighting the need for urgent intervention and the development of new rapid-onset antidepressant therapies.

We recruited 25 adult subjects referred to the outpatient clinics of Pavia suffering from TRD with current Moderate-Severe Depressive Episode (scoring ≥ 22 on the MADRS). Of them 9/25 patients has a BPD. Study duration was 8 weeks.The following evaluation scales were administered before the first drug administration (T0) and repeated after one week (T1), four weeks (T2) and eight weeks (T3) of treatment: Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (CSSRS), and The Zanarini Rating Scale for BPD subgroup patients. We also collected sociodemographic and clinical information. Dosages and frequency of esketamine administration during the study period, adverse events and reasons for discontinuation were also recorded.

A significant reduction of depressive symptoms was found at T1 and T2 compared to T0. Suicidal ideation disappeared as early as T1 and was maintained at T2, expecially in the BPD group. In the subgroup with borderline disorder we saw more improvement in impulsive (Self-mutilation and/or suicidal efforts; two other forms of impulsivity) and affective categories ( Inappropriate anger / frequent angry acts; chronic feelings of emptiness; mood instability) in Zanarini Rating Scale.

Our findings support the safety and tolerability of esketamine in TRD and BPD comorbidity sample. It is noteworthy that esketamine has an action on various pathways that are considered defective in borderline patients. Glutamate plays a key role in personality traits such as impulsivity, aggression, and suicidal behavior. Treatment with esketamine could reduce the number of suicide attempts and help reduce the self-harm of BPD.

None Declared

Treatment resistant schizophrenia still represents a major clinical and pharmacological challenge.30% of patients diagnosed with schizophrenia is characterised by a poor response to at least two different antipsychotics administered for a proper period of time and at adequate doses. Clozapine still represents the gold standard for treatment resistant patients. Unfortunately, a significant percentage of these are only partial responders. Augmentation strategies must be set up and atypical antipsychotic drugs are used in clinical practice. Promising findings have been observed in patients treated with Lurasidone as an add-on therapy with Clozapine. This novel second-generation antipsychotic has a unique receptor profile, showing 5-HT1a partial agonism and 5HT7 antagonism. These properties could also explain its procognitive effect, as several preclinical studies in literature have demonstrated.

The aim of our study is to highlight the advantages of add on therapy with Lurasidone compared with treatment as usual (i.e. Clozapine + another atypical antipsychotic) in treatment resistant schizophrenia patients.

We conducted an observational study in a sample of 20 patients diagnosed with treatment resistant schizophrenia, based on DSM-5 diagnostic criteria and psychopharmacologic history. Treatment choices were taken independently by clinicians in charge of each patient. 10 subjects underwent Lurasidone augmentation of Clozapine, whereas the remaining 10 subjects were treated as usual with Clozapine and another atypical antipsychotic. PANSS and BPRS scales to assess general psychopathology and UKU side effects scale were administered both at baseline and at follow-up (T1= 1 month; T2=6 months).

All patients treated with Lurasidone augmentation strategy achieved a significant reduction of both positive and negative symptoms, with no significant adverse effects to be reported. In particular, Lurasidone showed no impact on metabolic parameters nor on ECG features, namely the QTc interval. The psychopathological improvement appeared higher in patients who received Lurasidone than in those treated as usual. This was particularly evident in cognitive domains.

Our observation suggests that augmentation strategy with Lurasidone to Clozapine can lead to clinically significant improvements in psychopathology when compared to Clozapine combined with another atypical antipsychotic, with a good tolerability profile. In future we will increase the number of our sample and the duration of follow-up time. In order to have more relevant statistical results, further research on this topic is needed.

None Declared

Brexpiprazole is a novel antipsychotic drug. It exerts antagonistic activity at the serotonin 5HT2A, 5HT2B, 5HT7 and noradrenaline alpha 1b/2c receptors; it also acts as partial agonist of serotonin 5HT1 and dopamine D2, D3 receptors. Brexpiprazole is approved for the treatment of schizophrenia and as an add-on therapy for major depression.

This pilot study aims at exploring efficacy and tolerability of Brexpiprazole in a small sample of patients diagnosed with either a psychotic or a mood disorder.

This observational study was conducted at our Acute Psychiatric Inpatient Unit. We included 7 patients (5 males, 2 females) hospitalized between 2020 and 2021, diagnosed with schizophrenia spectrum disorders or mood disorders with psychotic symptoms confirmed by Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview. Patients who participated signed an informed consent. Information concerning diagnosis, demographic characteristics (age, sex, education, marital status) and pharmacological therapy were collected examining clinical records. The average lenght of hospitalization was 13.4 days. Psychopathology was assessed by means of the PANSS and the severity of the illness was evaluated with CGI severity scale (CGI-S), both on admission and discharge. We also administered the UKU scale to evaluate the tolerability profile.

.

Results can be seen in figures 1, 2, 3

Our study found a significant improvement in both positive and negative symptoms, with good tolerability. Limitations of our study are: small sample size and limited period of observation. These premises suggest that further research is needed in order to elucidate the exact mechanisms underlying Brexpiprazole’s action and the possible implication in mood disorders.

No significant relationships.

Individual abilities to perceive internal and external sensations are defined respectively as interoception and exteroception: the dysregulation of these functions can explain many psychotic symptoms. (Ardizzi et al. 2016)

We evaluated the differences in the interoceptive and exteroceptive perception between 39 patients with psychosis and 250 healthy controls using self-administered questionnaires. The association between interoception and exteroception in the two groups was also tested.

The tests we used are AASP (Adolescent / Adult Sensory Profile) and MAIA (Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness). Differences were measured with t-tests, associations with spearman’s correlation.

Significant differences emerged between the two samples in the AASP total score and in its Low registration (LR) and Sensory Avoiding (SA) sub-scales and in the MAIA total score and in all its sub-scales except “Not Worrying” (Fig.1). Different patterns of associations between AASP and MAIA were observed: psychotic patients showed negative correlations between MAIA and AASP in the LR and Sensation Seeking (SS) sub-scales and in the auditory (AU) and tactile (TO) sensory channels. Healthy controls, positive correlations emerged between MAIA and AASP in the Sensation Seeking (SK) sub-scale and in the “perception of movement” (MO) sub-score (Fig.2)(Fig.3).

Higher scores of psychotic patients in AASP and MAIA reveal both a disregulated sensory related behavior and a hightened awareness towards internal stimuli. The negative correlation between the two scales in psychotic subjects highlights the importance of the interaction between internal and external perception in determining the global subjective experience.

COVID-19 is an infectious disease caused by SARS-CoV-2. The WHO on March 11, 2020, has declared the novel coronavirus outbreak a global pandemic. Several studies found an association between the COVID-19 pandemic and psychiatric symptoms, such as distress, anxiety, fear of infection, depression and insomnia in the general population. Therefore, psychiatrists have been professionally overloaded, trying to manage the psychosocial impact of the pandemic and suffering its effects in person.

To evaluate the disease perceptions, distress and burnout among psychiatrists from the Department of Mental Health and Addictions of Pavia in three different times, which correspond to the three main phases of the pandemic management in Italy: T0 is the first peak of the infections and the lock-down, from March to June; T1 is the reduction of the infections and the reopening, from June to October; T2 is the second wave of infections with a new progressive closure, the current one.

We used three questionnaires: the BIPQ (Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire), the PSS-10 (Perceived Stress Scale-10), the PED (Profile of emotional distress). We also used a survey (6 items) in T0, T1 and T2 to evaluate exposure, perception, quality of life and burnout.

table 1,2,3. BIPQ: no one was exposed.

The increase of individual, who seeking help for mental health, impact on the perception of stress and on the emotional distress, even though psychiatrists have an adequate perception of COVID-19.

Some studies in literature highlight the correlation between immune-mediated inflammatory processes and psychiatric pathologies. However, there are few studies about the efficacy of IV immunoglobulins in psychiatric features (1). (1) ZUNSZAIN, Patricia A.; HEPGUL, Nilay; PARIANTE, Carmine M. Inflammation and depression. In: Behavioral neurobiology of depression and its treatment. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012. p. 135-151.

Case report: a 39 year patient diagnosed with borderline personality disorder and myasthenia was hospitalized for self-injury ideation, acting out and depressive episode treated with acid valproic, aripiprazole, gabapentin; flare-up of myasthenia that needed treatment.

Clinical and test evaluation was performed in three stages: before (t0), immediately after (t1) and 3 weeks after (t2) the administration of the IgEV without other treatment modifications. We have used: - Inventory of Statements About Self-Injury (ISAS) - Barrat Impulsiveness Scale, Version 11 (BIS-11) - Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) - Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) - Alexian Brothers Urge to Selfe-Injure Scale (ABUSI)

The patient has a score of 79 at BIS-11. She used to have a huge number of acting aout as we see on ISAS (Fig.1).Figure 1Figure 2

We observed a reduction in non-suicidal self-injurious ideation, the suspension of acting-out, a complete remission of depressive symptoms with mild persistence of anxious symptoms immediately after the administration of immunoglobulins, and the remission continue until one month after the administration (Fig.2).

No significant relationships.