We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Measuring and monitoring stress has potential benefits for the care and self-management of stressors for people with dementia. Early identification of stressors may help to cope with challenging behaviours (CB), occurring in up to 80% of nursing home residents with dementia. The identification of stressors causing CB is difficult (as often residents cannot themselves indicate what is experienced as stressful or relaxing), hampering the psychosocial approach. Several studies have found that skin conductance and heart activity can be used as a proxy for stress. Measuring these physiological parameters using wearable sensors, might be helpful to identify (de)stressors and consequently, a psychosocial treatment approach. Therefore, wearables are promising as a supportive technology in the care of people with dementia and CB. However, stakeholders (i.e., (in)formal caregivers of people with dementia) indicate that current available (wearable) systems to measure stress are not fit for purpose within the everyday care of people with dementia. In addition, due to legislation, not all systems are allowed. The purpose of the current research is to develop a system prototype together with different stakeholders.
Method:
A prototype of a system measuring stress suitable in the care for people with dementia will be developed during different iterations between September 2022-July 2024. A community of stakeholders will be built, in which the needs, requirements and evaluations of people with dementia, (in)formal caregivers, legal- and IT-experts, will be collected through literature studies, focus groups, interviews and co-design sessions. The system will be developed and adjusted appropriately, taking social, technical and legal requirements into account.
Results and discussion:
Preliminary results will be presented regarding identified requirements for initial system prototypes as well as lessons learned from first iterations with conceptual and working prototypes. Implications for the care and self-management of people with dementia will be discussed.
Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) seems a promising intervention for bipolar disorder (BD), but there is a lack of randomised controlled trials (RCT) investigating this. The purpose of this multicentre, evaluator blinded RCT was to investigate the added value of MBCT to treatment as usual (TAU) in BD up to 15 months follow-up (NCT03507647).
Methods
A total of 144 participants with BD type I and II were randomised to MBCT + TAU (n = 72) and TAU (n = 72). Primary outcome was current depressive symptoms. Secondary outcomes were current (hypo)manic and anxiety symptoms, recurrence rates, rumination, dampening of positive affect, functional impairment, mindfulness skills, self-compassion, and positive mental health. Potential moderators of treatment outcome were examined.
Results
MBCT + TAU was not more efficacious than TAU in reducing current depressive symptoms at post-treatment (95% CI [−7.0 to 1.8], p = 0.303, d = 0.24) or follow-up (95% CI [−2.2 to 6.3], p = 0.037, d = 0.13). At post-treatment, MBCT + TAU was more effective than TAU in improving mindfulness skills. At follow-up, TAU was more effective than MBCT + TAU in reducing trait anxiety and improving mindfulness skills and positive mental health. Exploratory analysis revealed that participants with higher depressive symptoms and functional impairment at baseline benefitted more from MBCT + TAU than TAU.
Conclusions
In these participants with highly recurrent BD, MBCT may be a treatment option in addition to TAU for those who suffer from moderate to severe levels of depression and functional impairment.