The comorbidity between depression and anxiety is a common occurrence. The DSM-5 introduced the “anxious distress” (AD) specifier that can be applied to any depressive episode – both in major depressive disorder (MDD) and bipolar disorder (BD) – when symptoms such as feelings of tension, restlessness, difficulty concentrating, and fear that something awful may happen or to lose control are present. Longitudinal data showed that the AD specifier may be an effective predictor of chronicity, time to remission, and functional disability in depressive disorders. In addition, evidence on AD proved its association with increased depressive symptom severity.

Available literature seems to suggest that AD occurs in a specific subgroup of patients, thus enabling a peculiar clinical profile to be outlined. To expand knowledge in this field, we performed a cross-sectional study aimed at identifying clinical correlates of AD in people with major depressive episodes.

Adult people admitted to two psychiatric inpatient units in the northern area of the Metropolitan City of Milan from May 2020 to December 2022 were screened for a major depressive episode and relevant specifiers using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 (SCID-5). Data on socio-demographic and clinical variables were collected. The severity of depressive and manic symptoms was assessed using the Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), respectively. Univariate comparisons between participants with and without AD were conducted, and two multiple logistic regression models were arranged to investigate the association between AD and candidate explanatory variables.

We included 206 inpatients with a major depressive episode (mean age =48.4 ± 18.6 years; males = 38.8%), of whom 155 diagnosed with MDD and 51 with BD. AD was present in 137 participants (66.5%). Mixed features (p=0.049), higher YMRS scores (p=0.004), psychotic features (p<0.05), and a diagnosis of MDD (p<0.05) were found to be associated with AD in the multiple logistic regression analysis.

Notwithstanding some limitations, such as the cross-sectional design and the inclusion of inpatient only, our study highlights the association of AD with mixed and psychotic features, as well as with MDD. Clinical implications of these results include the possible contribution in delineating a specific symptom profile in people with AD during a major depressive episode.

None Declared

Poor mental health of university students is a growing concern for public health. Indeed, academic settings may exacerbate students’ vulnerability to mental health issues. Nonetheless, university students are often unable to seek mental health support due to barriers, at both individual and organisational level. Digital technologies are proved to be effective in collecting health-related information and in managing psychological distress, representing useful instruments to tackle mental health needs, especially considering their accessibility and cost-effectiveness.

Although digital tools are recognised to be useful for mental health support, university students’ opinions and experiences related to such interventions are still to be explored. In this qualitative research, we aimed to address this gap in the scientific literature.

Data were drawn from “the CAMPUS study”, which longitudinally assesses students’ mental health at the University of Milano-Bicocca (Italy) and the University of Surrey (United Kingdom). We performed detailed interviews and analysed the main themes of the transcripts. We also performed a cross-cultural comparison between Italy and the United Kingdom.

Across 33 interviews, five themes were identified, and an explanatory model was developed. From the students’ perspective, social media, podcasts, and apps could be sources of significant mental health content. On the one hand, students recognised wide availability and anonymity as advantages that make digital technologies suitable for primary to tertiary prevention, to reduce mental health stigma, and as an extension of face-to-face interventions. On the other hand, perceived disadvantages were lower efficacy compared to in-person approaches, lack of personalisation, and difficulties in engagement. Students’ opinions and perspectives could be widely influenced by cultural and individual background.

Digital tools may be an effective option to address mental health needs of university students. Since face-to-face contact remains essential, digital interventions should be integrated with in-person ones, in order to offer a multi-modal approach to mental well-being.

None Declared

The worldwide spread of the COVID-19 pandemic affected all major sectors, including higher education. The measures to contain this deadly disease led to the closure of universities across the globe, introducing several changes in students’ academic and social experience. During the last two years, self-isolation together with the difficulties linked to online teaching and learning, have amplified psychological burden and mental health vulnerability of students.

We aimed to explore in depth students’ feelings and perspectives regarding the impact of the COVID-19 on their mental health and to compare these data among students from Italy and the UK.

Data were resulting from the qualitative arm of “the CAMPUS study”, a large ongoing project to longitudinally assess the mental health of university students enrolled at the University of Milano-Bicocca (Unimib, Italy) and the University of Surrey (UoS, Guildford, UK). We conducted in-depth interviews through the Microsoft Teams online platform between September 2021 and April 2022, and thematically analysed the transcripts.

A total of 33 students (15 for Unimib and 18 for UoS), with a wide range of sociodemographic characteristics, were interviewed. Four themes were identified: i) impact of COVID-19 on students’ mental health; ii) causes of poor mental health; iii) most vulnerable subgroups; vi) coping strategies.

Anxiety symptoms, social anxiety, and stress were frequently reported as negative effects of the pandemic, while the main sources of poor mental health were identified in loneliness, exceeding time online, unhealthy management of space and time, bad organization/communication with university, low motivation and uncertainty about the future. Freshers, international or off-campus students, as well as both extremely extroverted and introverted subjects, represented the most vulnerable populations, because of their extensive exposure to loneliness. Among coping strategies, the opportunity to take time for yourself, family support, and mental health support were common in the sample.

Some differences were found comparing students from Italy and the UK. While at Unimib the impact of COVID-19 on mental health was mainly described in relation to academic worries and the inadequate organization of the university system, UoS students, familiar to the conviviality of campus life, explained these effects as a result of the drastic loss of social connectedness.

The current study highlights the key role of mental health support for university students, mainly during crisis times, and calls for measures to improve communication between students and the educational institution, as well as to encourage social connectedness.

None Declared

The existence of a clinical entity on the spectrum of mood disorders characterized by the occurrence of manic episodes without major depressive episodes (Unipolar Mania, UM) is largely debated. Although not classified nosologically, the studies exploring this topic have suggested that UM might differ from bipolar disorder with a manic-depressive course (md-BD), in terms of several clinical characteristics. Individuals with UM might represent a subpopulation with specific clinical profiles and unmet care needs, requiring personalized treatments, as compared with those suffering from md-BD.

To identify clinical factors associated with UM, as compared with md-BD.

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies according to the MOOSE guidelines. We searched for articles indexed up to July 2022 in the main electronic databases. We conducted random-effects meta-analyses of the association between UM and relevant correlates, using odds ratio for categorical variables and standardized mean difference for continuous variables.

Based on data from 21 studies meeting the eligibility criteria, we found that individuals with UM, as compared with md-BD, were more likely to be males (p = 0.007) and to have an earlier age at onset (p = 0.020). Moreover, UM was significantly associated with a higher number of hospitalizations (p < 0.001), the occurrence of psychotic features (p < 0.001), as well as hyperthymic temperament (p = 0.012). Finally, subjects with UM were less likely to report a family history of depression (p = 0.006) and a personal history of suicide attempts (p < 0.001).

Our work supports the hypothesis that UM might represent a distinctive diagnostic construct, with peculiar clinical correlates. Additional research is needed to better differentiate UM in the context of affective disorders.

None Declared

The definition of mixed states has been changed over the years, leading to substantial heterogeneity and inconsistencies across studies, and thus limiting the understanding of this phenomenon. Given the limited data available after the introduction of the DSM-5 mixed features specifier (MFs), we conducted a cross-sectional study evaluating MFs in individuals suffering from affective disorders, i.e., major depressive disorder (MDD) or bipolar disorder (BD).

The aim of this study is to evaluate rates and correlates of MFs in a consecutive sample of inpatients with mood episodes.

We included adults consecutively admitted to our inpatient mental health unit with a current manic episode (ME) or major depressive episode (MDE). DSM-5 criteria were used to assess the occurrence of MFs. Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) and Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) were used to assess the severity of the mood episodes. We used the Kemp Compliance Rating Scale to assess medication adherence.

A total of 285 individuals were included (mean age ± SD: 48.3 ± 17.9; M/F ratio: 2/3). Among them, 94 (33.0%) were in a ME and 191 (67.0%) in a MDE. Forty individuals (14.0%) exhibited MFs. We found that MFs were significantly more frequent in participants with a diagnosis of BD (p<0.001) and during a ME (p=0.006). In addition, study participants with MFs had lower medication adherence at hospital admission (p=0.008). Finally, individuals with ME and MFs had lower YMRS scores than those without MFs (p<0.001), and, similarly, those with MDE and MFs had lower MADRS scores than those without MFs (p<0.001).

Considering DSM-5 classification, we found that MFs are a phenomenon strongly linked to BD. While the symptom severity of the prevalent polarity tends to be lower in episodes with MFs, the reduced adherence may be suggestive of a more complex clinical management requiring specific treatment approaches.

None Declared

QTc interval prolongation is considered a risk factor for fatal polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, which can result in sudden cardiac death. Most psychotropic drugs have a dose-dependent potential to prolong the QTc interval. However, other factors require appropriate consideration, including: age; gender; other medications; electrolyte abnormalities; severe comorbid conditions, such as co-occurring alcohol or substances abuse/dependence.

The objective was to study the potential mediating roles of alcohol/substances abuse on QTc prolongation.

The Italian research group STAR Network, in collaboration with the Young Italian Psychiatrists Association, aimed to evaluate the frequency of QTc interval prolongation in a sample of patients under treatment with psychotropic drugs through a cross-sectional national survey.

A sample of 2411 unselected patients were enrolled after performing an ECG during the recruitment period. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were collected from medical records. Collected data underwent statistical analysis.

A total of 11.2% of patients reported alcohol abuse, and only 8.9% psychotropic substances. According to the threshold, less than 20% of patients had a borderline value of QTc, and 1% a pathological value. Patients with co-occurring alcohol misuse and drug abuse were more likely to have longer QTc interval.

The present study describes the frequency of QTc prolongation in real-world clinical practice. Before prescribing a psychotropic drug, the physician should carefully assess its risks and benefits to avoid this type of adverse reaction, particularly when additional risk factors are present. The potential role of alcohol and substances on QTc length could be particularly useful in emergency settings.

The authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.