We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
A policy of multiculturalism is an integral part of the state's commitment to protecting group life. Yet, it also tests the limits of accommodation and interrogates the state's own ideology and its adherence to principles of equality and religious freedom. In multiculturalism policies, the status of women has been a common site of contestation and negotiation. Practices such as veiling, underage marriage, polygamy, and religious family law test the limits of tolerance. Debates around gender in the politics of difference serve simultaneously to name certain communities as backward and majority culture as the norm. A feminist critique of multiculturalism is critical to bring hidden perspectives into the dialogue between the community and the state, to highlight the gendered dimension of this issue, and to ensure that the community and state include subaltern voices in their dialogue on the accommodation of difference.
In this chapter, I discuss the idea of critical multiculturalism to better understand how pluralist democracies can formulate a policy that respects group difference while upholding gender equality. I consider these issues through the lens of Muslim women who are situated at the intersection of a religious community and secular state, making them a compelling category of analysis. Muslim women experience discrimination along multiple axes – as women, as Muslims, and as Muslim women. Their situation illustrates the paradox of multicultural vulnerability where the state's commitment to protecting minority rights can result in subordinating women's interests within the group. This raises questions of state legitimization of a differentiated citizenship through the creation of a parallel system of law that is explicitly discriminatory.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.