Patient engagement in the health technology assessment (HTA) field is crucial but faces significant challenges. This study focuses on identifying the barriers and facilitators surrounding the incorporation of patients in HTA while proposing solutions from the perspective of the Patient Interest Group (GIP) within the Spanish Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment and Services of the National Health System (RedETS).

An ad hoc questionnaire with four open-ended questions about barriers, facilitators, and proposals was developed and distributed among the GIP members through an email survey methodology. The obtained results were discussed in an open in-person meeting, and a thematic analysis of the data was conducted.

Fifteen people answered the questionnaire (at least one HTA researcher from each agency), and forty people participated in the face-to-face discussion. Main barriers included the perception of a lack of institutional support, insufficient participative culture, lack of time and experience, and difficulties in planning. Facilitators included activities organized within the GIP and methodological procedures and documents published. The main proposals for improvement were focused on the training and capacity building of HTA researchers and patients, institutional commitment to patient involvement, promotion of forums and activities with patient entities, and improvement of communication channels with patients and dissemination.

Despite current challenges in patient involvement, this study highlights facilitators and proposals for improvement. Specialized training and education, along with the promotion of a participative culture, emerge as relevant strategies.

Health technology assessment (HTA) bodies support healthcare decision-making by producing different kind of products. The high speed of the healthcare innovations and the scenarios such as the COVID-19 pandemic challenge HTA organizations to adapt their services to better respond to these demands. The Spanish Network of HTA Agencies (RedETS) is redefining the services and the products in its portfolio. The first step has been conducting a review in order to identify the most relevant HTA products.

A scoping review with two sections was conducted: (i) analysis of results from a bibliographic search performed in the main biomedical databases; and (ii) analysis of results from a manual review of the official websites of seven international HTA agencies: CADTH (Canada), INESSS (Canada), SBU (Sweden), NICE (United Kingdom), IQWIG (Germany), HAS (France), IECS (Argentina) and IETS (Colombia). The EUnetHTA website was also reviewed.

The search identified 1,311 references; 21 studies were considered relevant. The main topic found was about rapid responses services. The standard timeline for these should be less than six months, with even some produced in days. Transparency about methodology and involvement of decision-makers were considered key points to be included. Website analysis revealed similar HTA reports production but variation in the domains and elements considered. The timeframe for conducting a full HTA report can be up to 24 months, with a median of 12 months. Agencies also offer some kinds of rapid response services. Scientific consultation and horizon scanning systems for emerging technologies are other services performed by some agencies.

The review reveals that agencies have different products to address different needs throughout the life cycle of technologies: from scientific advice to full HTA. In addition, HTA agencies have incorporated rapid responses into their services. According to literature, these products could support short-term decision-making.

The Patient Involvement (PI) Interest Group of the Spanish Network of Health Technology Assessment Agencies (RedETS) was set up in 2017 by a group of health technology assessment (HTA) researchers interested in PI. Since its inception, training and capacity-building to support PI and patient-based evidence in HTA processes has been one of its main aims. The objective of this work was to identify the needs and priorities related to training and capacity building activities to be developed within the framework of the PI Interest Group.

The PI Interest Group met on November 14, 2022, for its Annual Meeting. The group discussed the needs, priorities and possibilities on training, and carried out a prioritization exercise. For this purpose, a self-reported and anonymous questionnaire was used, which included 16 training activities. Every item was scored with a Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 10.

The questionnaire was answered by twenty participants. The most highly rated training activities (mean less than or equal to 8) were: qualitative evidence synthesis (8.75); PI case studies (basic (8.65) and advanced (8.56) level); quality assessment tools for qualitative evidence (8.37); and qualitative research (8.11). Other proposals scoring above 7 points were: ethical aspects related to PI, evaluation of patient participation and impact, identification and recruitment procedures, and discrete choice experiments. The group agreed to organize bi-monthly webinars and three structured training activities for the whole RedETS network on: Qualitative Evidence Synthesis, Qualitative Research and PI Case Studies.

The prioritization of training activities according to PI Interest Group members allowed planning a tailored capacity-building program adapted to the needs of RedETS.

Health technology assessment (HTA) agencies in Spain have an important role in informing decisions about the introduction and use of health technologies in the Spanish National Health System. However, although different approaches have been taken to measure and improve their impact, no study to date has explored the perceived impact of HTA products at the national level. The aim of this study was to explore the perspectives of macro-, meso-, and micro-level decision makers on how to improve the impact of HTA.

Three online focus groups were conducted with policy makers, healthcare managers, clinicians, and patients. The transcripts were evaluated using a deductive thematic analysis based on a multidimensional framework to explore mechanisms of impact.

Four key themes were identified:

1. (i) Timeliness and use of HTA assessments: Although the quality of the reports was recognized, the time taken for the elaboration and extension of reports negatively affected their use. Participants considered that reports should be tailored to the needs of end users (e.g., briefer versions available for meso-and micro-level use);

2. (ii) Effective engagement and external communications: The engagement of multiple stakeholders (policy makers, manufacturers, clinicians, and patients) in the elaboration process was considered crucial to improve HTA impact and ensure adequate communication of results;

3. (iii) Good institutional reputation and fit within the healthcare and policy making system: Stakeholders agreed on the need to strengthen collaboration at the national level and increase public understanding of the value of HTA and its use in healthcare decision-making; and

4. (iv) Effective implementation of policy change regarding health technologies: Stakeholders were very receptive to the results and recommendations of HTA reports when new technologies are demanded, but the identification and selection process should be improved to guarantee that these reports are available on time.

This study has identified different proposals and mechanisms that could improve the impact of HTA in Spain.

Patient-reported outcome measures are being increasingly considered both in clinical practice and in the field of health technology assessment. Although emotional distress is currently recognized as the sixth vital sign in cancer care, its early detection and screening is not yet included in routine clinical practice in Spain. The main objective of this study was to assess the psychometric properties and diagnostic accuracy of validated tools for the early detection of distress among adults with cancer in the Spanish context, at the request of the Spanish National Health System (NHS) Cancer Strategy.

A systematic review was carried out to analyze development and validation studies. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool (QUADAS-2) was used for the risk of bias assessment, and a multicriteria global assessment was used for the tests. Ethical and organizational aspects were also addressed.

Fifteen validation studies were included, corresponding to seven tests. The tools considered were the Distress Thermometer (DT), the Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (BSI-18), the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System-revised (ESAS-r), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), the Visual Analog Scale for Anxiety and Depression (VAS-AD), the Detection of Emotional Distress (DED) scale, and the Psychosocial and Spiritual Needs Evaluation (ENP-E) scale. Evidence of validity, reliability (internal consistency), and diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) were summarized. Three scales were rated as poor (VAS-AD, BSI-18, and ESAS-r), the ENP-E scale was rated as acceptable, and three scales were rated as moderate (DT, DED, and HADS).

The DT (single-item measure) stands out as an appropriate tool for early detection of emotional distress in the Spanish NHS. The use of this scale could be considered a first stage, to be combined later with a longer scale to improve screening specificity. The HADS scale could be utilized for this purpose. The use of these tools should be framed within a structured screening program that ensures further evaluation and subsequent psychological care when needed.

Patient involvement (PI) has become a key priority to the Spanish Network of Agencies for Assessing National Health System Technologies and Performance (RedETS). As part of the national strategy to promote PI, an interest group was created in 2017 to share knowledge, develop methodologies and standardize PI processes. The aim of this work is to analyze the main activities of the Patient Interest Group 5 years after its launch and to reflect on possible needs and challenges.

Narrative description and an in-depth analysis of the main activities of the Interest Group from 2017 to the present.

The group is composed of HTA researchers from the 8 regional agencies in Spain and is supported by the Ministry of Health and the RedETS council. It currently has the participation of 26 researchers, organized into different working subgroups. The initial lines of work were the analysis of the situation, the development of procedures, and the initiation of training materials for patients on HTA. At present, the main projects are the development of metrics for evaluating the impact of patient participation, the development of procedural materials to promote methodological process standardizaton (e.g., a flowchart with the main process steps, checklists, templates), and the design and piloting of virtual training for patients in HTA. New lines include the analysis of the ethical challenges of PI and the feasibility of setting up an HTA patient registration system and a patient forum to facilitate participation. In addition, the interest group has promoted the exchange of relevant information for PI and the organization of capacity building activities.

The RedETS Patient Interest Group is encouraging the development of activities, reflection on collective experiences, and tools that facilitate PI in Spain. Among the main challenges are the need to ensure the quality and applicability of PI and to analyze the views of patients who have actively participated in HTAs.

Health technology assessment (HTA) reports are complex technical documents that address multiple aspects of the incorporation of a technology into the health care system applying complicated methodologies coming from different disciplines. The purpose of HTA is to support decision-makers and these should have an adequate level of training to fully understand these assessments. However, most HTA education programs and courses are intended for HTA doers and there is a lack of practical guidance training aimed at preparing health managers or policy makers in HTA. The objective is to describe an HTA training program developed for decision-makers of the three levels (health care administration, hospital management and clinical practice).

Rolling Collaborative Review (RCR) 01 of convalescent plasma was identified and selected because it complied with our Population Intervention Comparator Outcome Design Question. The EUnetHTA HTA adaptation Toolkit was used to check the relevance (about research question); reliability (quality of the report) and transferability (application of information to the target setting). Additional considerations regarding the local context were examined. A panel of four professionals and one patient was formed to rate the importance of the outcomes and to carry out the external review

According to the toolkit, information on RCR01 Convalescent Plasma could be adopted for the safety and effectiveness domains. The technical characteristics and current use domains were adapted and extended. It was considered of interest to include the domains of organization and ethics. The organizational aspects were answered through the information retrieved in a search for systematic reviews and guides, and with the collaboration of experts. The ethics domain was answered through a specific literature search on ethical issues related to COVID-19 and transfusions.

The use of the EUnetHTA Toolkit has been helpful in supporting the adaptation process. The adoption of the effectiveness and safety domains from already developed HTA assessments is an efficient way to provide useful information for the decision-making process. However, contextual elements should be included in the adaptation process to ensure a complete framework for the decision.

Patients have knowledge, perspectives and experiences that are unique and can make an essential contribution to Health Technology Assessment (HTA). However, in order for their participation to be effective, they need to be able to understand how HTA reports are generated and the decision-making processes that they inform. The aim is to describe the development and virtualization of training materials for patients, as well as to their implementation in a pilot study.

A working group from Spanish Network of Agencies for Assessing National Health System Technologies and Performance (RedETS) agencies was created to develop educational materials in collaboration with patients. The content was based on international initiatives and feedback from the working group. The project was initiated in November 2020. The team consisted of HTA researchers, technicians with experience in training and virtualization and patients. The final version was obtained after an iterative process and refinement of the content and design.

The materials were published in complete and summary versions, and they were translated into Catalan, Basque and Galician. The online course was designed in an e-learning platform (Moodle) with the aim of being implemented by each of the agencies. The materials include relevant and summarized information on HTA processes, current framework at national and European level, and the role of patients in HTA. Health research and the importance of qualitative and quantitative methods are also addressed. The course also includes a module of practical aspects of patient and citizen participation for achieving an effective contribution to HTA. The course is being piloted with patients in different regions in Spain. The objective of the pilot is to evaluate the usefulness and satisfaction with the course, and it has been designed with the purpose of incorporating the pertinent modifications in the course.

The online training course is intended to facilitate the acquisition of knowledge related to the processes and tools of HTA for patients, as well as to inform them in what phases and in what way they can participate. The pilot will provide relevant information on its use in practice. It is expected that the course will favor capacity building and patient involvement.

Qualitative research is being increasingly integrated in heath technology assessments (HTA) within the Spanish Network of Agencies for Assessing National Health System Technologies and Performance (RedETS). Qualitative research methodological guidelines are given in RedETS HTA guidelines and the Patient Involvement Strategy. A specific methodological guideline to systematically review qualitative studies was published in 2007 and is pending its update. The impact of their implementation is unknown. The aim of this work is to analyze the techniques, impact and reporting of qualitative research (primary and secondary) in HTAs.

A manual search of the HTAs published in the last 5 years in RedETS was conducted to locate assessments that include qualitative research. To ensure a complete identification, RedETS agencies and units were consulted to provide information about the assessments that have used qualitative techniques in their development over the past 5 years. A content analysis of the selected assessments was conducted to analyze the techniques, impact and reporting of qualitative research in HTA.

In the past five years, focus groups, semi-structured interviews, evidence synthesis of observational studies including qualitative studies have been used and integrated in HTA in RedETS. Most of them have been linked to patient involvement facilitation or the inclusion of patient perspectives in HTA. Qualitative research has been used to analyze patient’s experiences and values, to elicit and select important outcome measures for patients, to research for barriers-facilitators for technology implementation and to inform evidence to decision frameworks.

Qualitative primary and secondary research is being used in HTA in Spain. It is mainly linked to patient involvement strategies both to elicit patient perspectives directly or to collect patient-based evidence. The impact of qualitative research in HTA is broad and diverse, extending from the scope of the assessments to the drafting of the recommendations.

In 2017, a Patient Involvement Interest Group (PIIG) was created in the Spanish Network for Health Technology Assessment of the National Health System (RedETS) to facilitate and promote Patient Involvement (PI) in Health Technology Assessment (HTA). The PIIG proposed a decisional flowchart to guide researchers’ in decisions regarding PI methods in HTA. The flowchart proposed a combination of direct involvement and incorporation of patient-based evidence depending on the scope and the aims of the assessment.

This work aims to present the flowchart and the results of the evaluation of the latest experiences in PI in HTA in RedETS (2018–2020), including direct-involvement and patient-based evidence.

A survey was sent to the HTA researchers who implemented PI initiatives in RedETS assessments. The survey asked to describe their experiences, lessons learned, challenges and added value regarding the use of direct-involvement, systematic reviews (SR) and primary studies. A descriptive analysis was performed and the results were discussed in an online PIIG workshop.

Thirty-two assessments included direct PI, twenty-one SR synthesized qualitative and quantitative studies about patient experiences, values and preferences and eight included primary studies, mainly of qualitative design. Recruitment and the lack of methodological resources were the main barriers both for direct PI and primary studies. Relevance of the included studies was the main barrier for SR. Added value was found in all PI methods. Direct-involvement had an impact on the project plan and PICO definition, outcomes relevance, information about the health condition and treatments. SR contributed with relevant patient-based evidence, deeper assessment of patient experiences, values and preferences and implementation factors. Primary studies developed new or contextualized knowledge directly applicable to decision-making.

The PI flowchart has served to facilitate the incorporation of patient input in HTA reports. The different approaches implemented have allowed to provide relevant and well-grounded data in each report to inform decision-making in patient-centered healthcare provision, but it is necessary that specific training and resources are provided to enable adequate and timely implementation.

The management of the COVID-19 pandemic is a challenge for Health Technology Assessment (HTA) methodology due to the need to formulate evidence-based recommendations in times of uncertainty in minimal time - for a large number of publications and with changing or even contradictory information. Living systematic reviews (LSRs) are systematic reviews that are continually updated, incorporating relevant new evidence as it becomes available. Since the COVID-19 pandemic fits all criteria to perform LSRs: (i) the Review question is a particular priority for decision-making, (ii) there is an high level of uncertainty about the existing evidence, and (iii) there is likely to be emerging evidence that will impact on the conclusions of the LSR, the aim of which is to analyze the role of LSRs as an innovative approach to HTA in recent years, and its impact on the management of the pandemic.

A systematic search of LSRs (published or protocols) was run on the main biomedical databases (Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library) in November 2020 and it was rerun in June 2021 without time limit. The results will be analyzed and classified by year and category (epidemiology, treatment, prognosis, symptoms, diagnosis and vaccines).

The literature research has returned a total of 187 publications. The LSR concept emerged in 2014, from which some LSRs began to be published, but an exponential increase has been observed in 2020 with 76 references of which 66 percent were focused on the SARS-CoV-2. By category, 81.8 percent were focused on treatment, 41.8 percent on epidemiology, 20.9 percent on rehabilitation, 15.1 percent on diagnosis, 10.2 percent on prognosis and 2.2 percent on symptoms until June 2021. There wasn't any LSR for vaccines and 28 percent was focused on other fields.

LSRs are particularly important during the COVID-19 pandemic, with research evidence emerging rapidly, current evidence being uncertain, and new research changing policy or decisions on health. The majority of LSRs published up to June 2021 were focused on the treatment of COVID-19.

This paper aims to describe the development of a flowchart to guide the decisions of researchers in the Spanish Network for Health Technology Assessment of the National Health System (RedETS) regarding patient involvement (PI) in Health Technology Assessment (HTA). By doing so, it reflects on current methodological challenges in PI in the HTA field: how best to combine PI methods and what is the role of patient-based evidence.

A decisional flowchart for PI in HTA was developed between March and April 2019 following an iterative process, reviewed by the members of the PI Interest Group and other RedETS members and validated during an online deliberative meeting. The development of the flowchart was based on a previous methodological framework assessed in a pilot study.

The guidelines on how to involve patients in HTA in the RedETS were graphically represented in a flowchart. PI must be included in all HTA reports, except those that assess technologies with no relevant impact on patients’ experiences, values, and preferences. Patient organizations or expert patients related to the topic of the HTA report must be identified and invited. These patients can participate in protocol development, outcomes' identification, assessment process, and report review. When the technology assessed affects in a relevant way patient experiences, values, and preferences, patient-based evidence should be included through a systematic literature review or a primary study.

The decisional flowchart for PI in HTA contributes to the current methodological challenges by proposing a combination of direct involvement and patient-based evidence.

The Spanish Network of Agencies for Assessing National Health System Technologies and Performance (RedETS) defined a patient involvement (PI) framework for health technology assessment (HTA) activities in 2016. The aim of this study is to evaluate the process and impact of those PI initiatives that were implemented in the first year following the publication of this new framework.

A survey was sent to those HTA researchers who implemented PI in RedETS projects. Responses were reviewed by two authors. An adapted thematic analysis was performed and the results were later discussed by all authors.

Six responses from six agencies/units were analyzed. The objectives of PI initiatives were the following: inclusion of patient perspectives, preferences and values; elicitation of important health outcomes measures; and barriers, facilitators, or suggestions for implementation. Different methods were used for PI: surveys, focus groups, in depth interviews, and participation in an expert panel. Five main themes emerged: (i) challenges with the recruitment process, (ii) needs identified, (iii) impact of PI, (iv) lessons learned, and (v) suggestions for the future.

PI initiatives within the RedETS framework were tailored to each HTA project, its specific goals and the individual needs and resources of each HTA agency. The results also pointed out how PI has a relevant impact that has enriched RedETS products providing key information on experiences, values, and preferences of patients, contributions that benefit the HTA and the process of drawing up recommendations. The main challenges were related to recruitment processes and capacity building.

In the past decades the community-based participatory research method known as PhotoVoice has gained relevance, but there are few published studies on its application in the field of health technology assessment (HTA) and clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). The aim of this presentation was to describe a PhotoVoice project linked to a CPG on major depression in children and adolescents.

The design of the study was adapted to the main objective, which was to enhance the understanding of major depression and improve clinical practice with the contributions of clinicians, methodologists, and patients. Seven adolescents and ten of their family members participated in the study through PhotoVoice sessions and focus groups. The audio recordings of all sessions were transcribed verbatim and coded, and a thematic analysis was undertaken.

Six themes emerged: (i) a lack of understanding and information about depression in childhood and adolescence; (ii) the importance of support groups; (iii) the need to favor early care and access to services; (iv) the adaptation of therapeutic strategies tailored to individual needs; (v) the sensitivity of professionals; and (vi) fostering interaction between the health and education systems. Photographic exhibitions were planned to share the main results. These exhibitions were promoted to increase public awareness and reduce stigmatization, and to reach clinicians and policy makers. From a methodological point of view, the use of PhotoVoice in this study helped to effectively incorporate the lived experiences, concerns, and preferences of patients and their relatives into the CPG. The study also confirmed the value of photographs and participatory methods. The main limitations and strengths of the study, as well as suggestions for future research, are also outlined.

PhotoVoice is a flexible, effective, and innovative method of obtaining information about patients’ perspectives and experiences, and it offers the added value of being able to reach the main stakeholders, including policymakers and the public.

The specificities of non-pharmaceuticals can require adapting classical health technology assessment (HTA) methodologies and developing additional regional approaches to support decision-making processes. However, little information exists regarding the explicit approaches used in different countries. The aim of this work is to provide an overview of the role and activities of the Galician HTA agency (avalia-t, Spain) regarding assessment, appraisal and continued evaluation across the whole life cycle of non-pharmaceutical technologies.

In depth review and analysis of the activities undertaken by avalia-t during the past five years to support the introduction and appropriate use of non-pharmaceutical health care technologies at the regional level.

A multidisciplinary Commission judges the added value of new non-pharmaceuticals and establishes the indications and conditions for use. HTAs, which are mandatory for all relevant technologies, rely on the best available evidence on safety and effectiveness but also provide fit for purpose contextualized information based on organizational data and administrative registers. Interaction with multidisciplinary stakeholders is commonly needed to complement the evidence base (ad hoc working groups, face to face discussions), and post-launch studies can be implemented to analyze the utilization and results in real world practice. Performance indicators and other HTA based products can also be required to ensure the quality of health care (e.g., appropriate use indications, quality indicators, evidence based patient information). In addition, technical and scientific advice/support can be provided at different decision levels of the health organization to promote the quality of care and appropriate use of technologies (e.g., regional mental health program, suicide management strategy, bariatric surgery surveillance registry).

Rigorous, comprehensive and systematic processes for supporting non-pharmaceutical technology adoption and implementation are required. Although it is acknowledged that core information does not differ substantially within countries, contextualized information is recognized as essential for establishing the conditions for use at the regional level.

Conclusions and recommendations of health technology assessment (HTA) reports have an impact on all relevant actors involved in the health system (health authorities, administrators, health professionals, patients, citizens and industry). The involvement of all those relevant stakeholders in the HTA process facilitates making valid and informed decisions and an efficient allocation of resources. Improving communication, participation and transparency among all agents will lead to more efficient evaluation and decision-making processes.

To review key aspects of the relations between HTA agencies and health industries, two process were carried out: a narrative review of literature searched in Medline, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL and WOS (2007-2017) and a review of websites of international HTA agencies. References and webs with information on the framework, objectives, methodologies, impact or results of the relationships were included.

A total of 1961 references were located and forty-five were selected. From the synthesis of the selected references the following key aspects of the relationships between HTA and industry were identified: (i) the importance of early dialogues with industry to align HTA objectives with the generation of evidence; (ii) challenges of the bias in the evidence produced by industry; (iii) difficulties in industry engagement in HTA processes; and (iv) industry interest in HTA. The review of six agency websites provided information on industry involvement in strategic activities, early dialogues, provision of documentation, management of industry clarifications, review of the report/allegations and other forms of relationship.

Both the review of the literature and the contents of the web pages of international agencies with experience in relations with industry show that the interest is in the creation of collaborative frameworks between regulatory authorities that decide on authorization and price and reimbursement and HTA agencies, while both try to maintain an early, transparent and systematic interaction with the healthcare industry.

In December 2017, a patient involvement (PI) Interest Group was created in the Spanish Network of Agencies for Assessing National Health System Technologies and Performance (RedETS) Annual conference. It started as a voluntary group of health technology assessment (HTA) methodologists interested in PI. The objective of the Group is to promote and facilitate PI in HTA. With the support of the Spanish Ministry of Health and the RedETS Council the Interest Group grew to at least one member for each of the eight RedETS regional agencies and units. It currently has 22 members. The PI Interest Group works in periodic online meetings and an annual offline meeting to establish a space for experiences exchange and reach consensus on main issues regarding PI.

RedETS published a strategy to facilitate effective and efficient PI in HTA processes in 2017. The long-term objective is to mainstream PI in all RedETS products. This strategy was built on a literature review and a qualitative study with semi-structured interviews. The interviews detected capacity building needs for technicians and methodologist in the network to be able to actively engage patients in HTA reports.

Since the kick-off meeting the PI Interest Group has worked in a number of activities. The main lines of action since its creation were: (i) evaluation of PI process in RedETS HTA reports in 2017 and in current reports, (ii) discussion on main methodological and procedural aspects, and feasibility of different patient participation approaches, (iii) development of technical protocols and templates to facilitate PI, (iv) the creation/adaptation of educational materials for patients and (v) translation of the HTAi Glossary for patients to Spanish.

Peer-to-peer learning processes can foster technical capacity of HTA methodologist in the Spanish HTA Network and may favor the implementation of the PI strategy.

The aim of this study was to develop a feasible and effective strategy to involve patients in the Spanish Network of Agencies of Health Technology Assessment (RedETS).

The framework for patient involvement (PI) in the assessment activities and processes of RedETS were developed through a research project that included: (i) a systematic search of the international literature describing a strategy and/or a methodology linking health technology assessment (HTA) and PI; (ii) a qualitative study through interviews with RedETS members to analyze the perceptions of PI among HTA managers in the Spanish context; (iii) a Delphi consultation with three large platforms of patients, carers and consumer organizations in Spain about their perspectives of PI; (iv) a consensus process with the members of the RedETS Governing Council to define the final strategy.

Three main themes were identified in the literature and Web site review: (i) PI methods for the different HTA phases; (ii) Participant definition and selection; (iii) Resources needed. A three-step implementation strategy was proposed: (i) short-term actions: piloting and testing patient participation in HTA and building patients' capacity; (ii) medium-term actions: broadening the participation of patients, and building internal capacity; (iii) long-term actions: consolidating and mainstreaming patient involvement

Patient participation can be incorporated into almost all the HTA phases and products with greater or lesser degrees of difficulty. However, a progressive implementation strategy is suggested for a feasible PI process.