To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Chapter 6 provides an overview of best practices in dyadic qualitative studies – both in terms of their design and their analysis. We begin our discussion of dyadic qualitative research approaches with an overview of qualitative design, noting how decisions about interviewing approaches, recording and coding of the interviews, and the use of prompts should be guided by one’s research objectives and questions. From there, we explore how to approach dyadic qualitative analyses with the goal of treating the dyad as the unit of analysis and the implications of doing so for both analysis and interpretation. We conclude our chapter by discussing best practices in mixed methods designs with special consideration of how to determine which design (e.g., qualitatively driven mixed method, quantitatively driven mixed method) may be best suited to address one’s theoretically-driven dyadic research question.
To identify the prevalence of unhealthy dietary behaviours and their social-ecological influences in adolescents.
Design:
The study used a sequential explanatory mixed-methods design, which begins with the collection of quantitative data, followed by the collection of qualitative data to explain and enrich the quantitative findings. Quantitative data were collected via a global school-based student health survey and were analysed using quantitative approaches. Qualitative data were obtained via focus group discussions and were analysed thematically.
Setting:
Middle and high secondary schools in Taza city, Morocco.
Participants:
Our quantitative analyses included 764 students (14–19 years). For the qualitative part, seventeen focus group discussions were conducted with 100 participants (fifty-six adolescents, twenty-six parents and eighteen teachers).
Results:
Of total student participants, 46·1 % skipped breakfast, 60·6 % had inadequate intake of fruits and vegetables (F&V), 39·4 % consumed soft drinks and 28·0 % consumed fast foods. All of these dietary behaviours could coexist in the same person except for inadequate intake of F&V. Gender, academic performance, age, perceived family income and education level of mother were associated with unhealthy dietary behaviours. Qualitative findings identified seven themes regarding social-ecological influences on adolescents’ dietary behaviours: cognitive, affective/biological, lifestyle, outcome expectation, social network, accessibility/availability and macro-level influences.
Conclusions:
The prevalence of unhealthy dietary behaviours in our study group is a concern. Dietary behaviours are the result of inseparable interactions among social-ecological influences. Modifiable factors identified may be useful when designing a future intervention aimed at improving breakfast and F&V consumption and reducing fast/snack-food consumption among adolescents.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.