To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The way B-visa applicants’ presentation of self to surveyors and officers in their visa interviews differs from those that are applying for other types of visas-like degree-seeking student visas, cultural exchange visas, and skilled worker visas, which are more frequently converted to immigrant visas. This is due to a provision in the immigration law statute–the dual-intent doctrine–that encourages US visa officers to evaluate immigrant intent more strictly with the former than the latter by not denying nonimmigrant visas to such latter applicants based on the likelihood that they will change their mind about immigrating after they arrive in the United States. Therefore, I show how B nonimmigrant visa (NIVs) applicants answer questions differently than all other nonimmigrant visa applicants about how they first came to go abroad, why they want to visit the United States rather than another country, what questions the visa officer asked them, and why or why not they would immigrate or not into the United States. (Im)mobility capital is not as important to demonstrate for those applying for such high-conversion visas as those with low-conversion visas due to the dual-intent doctrine.
Chapter 1 describes the defining characteristics of motivation ( i.e. purpose, flexibility and goal direction, reinforcement, affect, a capacity to overcome obstacles, resolution of competition), with varying sensitivity to internal (e.g. nutrient levels) and external incentive (e.g. food) factors. The dichotomy between approach and avoidance is introduced. It goes on to introduce the topics of the remaining chapters of the book. Motivation potentiates certain functionally appropriate responses (e.g. lordosis in the female rat). The chapter describes Tinbergen’s four types of explanation: causal, functional, evolutionary, and developmental/learning.
This study aimed to detect designers’ motivations (Personal Identity, Conformity, Life Efficiency, and Information) in using Generative AI in AI-assisted design and how these motivations related to post-design evaluations of AI (Attitudes, Satisfaction, and Continuance Intention). The results showed that personal identity, conformity, and efficiency motives can predict attitudes and satisfaction for the use of Generative AI in AI-assisted design. No motivation indicated in the study can predict continuance intention, which suggests that long-term AI usage depends on factors beyond motivation.
Throughout decades of research, motivation remains a vital part of psychology and other areas of the behavioural sciences. Frederick Toates explores this important psychological and biological process through an integrative account of how internal and external influences shape the decision making that guides and activates behaviour. Now extensively updated and expanded for modern readership, this textbook is equally accessible to undergraduates and engaging for academics. Drawing on psychology, neuroscience, and ethology, it presents a uniquely synthesised perspective of what motivates us. The chapters pull together diverse phenomena under one conceptual roof, including newly examined causes of behaviour such as the motivation associated with pain. Richly illustrated with personal anecdotes and examples from leading figures in the behavioural sciences, the text is accompanied by a test bank. This clear and supportive guide reveals how motivation systems take shape from the interactions between brain, body, and environment.
This chapter examines creativity as a cognitive, social, and motivational process that involves divergent idea generation and convergent refinement. It contextualizes generative AI within the long history of technology shaping art, from Renaissance science to modern algorithmic art. Through cases such as AARON and MidJourney, the authors question whether AI creativity is “real” or an illusion shaped by anthropomorphism. They highlight how motivation, childhood development, and organizational culture shape creativity, and how AI can act as collaborator, accelerator, or threat depending on its use. Ultimately, human–AI co-creativity is positioned as both an opportunity and a challenge for redefining authorship and innovation.
This study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to reducing free sugar intakes while participants were in the process of attempting to do this. Sixty-two adults with free sugar intakes >5% total energy intake; participants in a randomised controlled trial examining the effects of three different dietary recommendations versus control for reducing free sugar intakes were interviewed at either 1, 2, 4, 8, or 12 weeks after receiving their recommendation. Data were analysed using thematic analysis and framework analysis based on recommendation received, time for change, and success in reducing free sugar intakes at 12 weeks. Thematic analysis revealed seven interactive themes leading to dietary change: ‘Is it possible?’; ‘Power of knowledge’; ‘Personal balance and empowerment’; ‘Habitual approach’; ‘Realities of life’; ‘Extensive awareness and viewpoint’; and ‘Proof and impact’. Framework analysis revealed greater knowledge, including knowledge related to practical solutions, in intervention groups compared to control; greater intentions and expectations at the start of the process, followed by increasing or decreasing engagement and satisfaction over time, with noticeable physical and subjective proof occurring from 4 weeks; and active engagement, with growing confidence and motivation in those who ended the trial having reduced their free sugar intakes compared to more passive attitudes in those less successful. Our findings demonstrate clear variation in barriers and facilitators to reducing free sugar intakes throughout the process, dependent also on recommendation received and individual orientation. Suggestions for improving free sugar intake reduction can be offered based on these differences.
How do you become a creative, successful, and hopefully, happy psychologist? We have studied psychological scientists who have become eminent in their field (Sternberg, 2016). We draw upon what we have learned in this chapter. In particular, the chapter draws from the list of characteristics that typify psychological scientists who make it to the top. Most of these characteristics apply to practicing psychologists as well. We have supplemented the list with characteristics especially important for practicing psychologists. We hope you find the list useful to you in developing your career, whatever that career may be!
The study of conversational interaction among second language (L2) learners and their interlocutors has been central to the study of second language acquisition since the beginning of the 1980s. Numerous studies have shown the facilitative role of interaction for L2 acquisition and several factors that influence the process have been identified and investigated in depth. The main aim of this chapter is to provide the reader with updated information on three particular areas in which research has grown in the past decade, namely the mediating role of individual differences in the process of interaction, interaction in technology-mediated environments and child interaction in low-input (foreign language) contexts. The first two topics are of general interest for the cognitive-interactionist framework, while the third focuses on an underresearched population about which basically no studies were published in the previous decade. The major findings in those three areas will be highlighted and lines for further research identified.
Roughly half of the world’s population are bilingual, that is, around four billion people. Worldwide, language learning is on the rise, driven by factors such as immigration, globalization, and an increased awareness of the value of learning another language. In this chapter we explain how we learn languages in addition to our mother tongue, that is, the language we grew up speaking from early childhood. How is learning a second language different to learning a first? What are some of the challenges people face when learning another language? We explore issues around translation, and the creative inventions of sci-fi like the babel fish and the Tardis, versus the capabilities and limitations of AI. We take a look at unique cases of true (and fake) polyglot savants, and we revisit those who suddenly speak with another accent, or even in an entirely different language. We also see what science says about the considerable cognitive and social benefits of learning a new language.
The chapter addresses: 1. Overview of Design Principles. 2. Principles to Motivate Learners to Exert Effort to Learn. 3. Principles to Help Learners Focus on Relevant Information. 4. Principles to Help Learners Manage the Flow of Relevant Information. 5. Principles to Help Learners Build Connections Between Corresponding Verbal and Visual Information. 6. Principles to Help Learners Actively Make Sense of Incoming Information. 7. Future Directions
The chapter addresses: 1. Overview of the Positivity Principle. 2. Theoretical Rationale for the Positivity Principle. 3. Empirical Rationale for the Positivity Principle. 4. Boundary Conditions for the Positivity Principle. 5. Applications of the Positivity Principle
The chapter addresses: 1. Overview of the Personalization Principle. 2. Theoretical Rationale for the Personalization Principle. 3. Empirical Rationale for the Personalization Principle. 4. Boundary Conditions for the Personalization Principle. 5. Applications of the Personalization Principle
Alternative dairy management practices are often touted as avenues for achieving environmental, social, and cultural sustainability in the unique Northeastern United States dairy market. Some of these management practices, like selling into alternative markets, becoming certified organic, and grazing, are specifically outlined by researchers and policymakers as opportunities for farmers in the Northeast. This research uses the thematic analysis of 25 semi-structured interviews to develop an understanding of farmers’ attitudes toward and willingness to adopt these management practices. Participating farmers represented a range of farm size, location, and attributes, including those who used some, all, or none of these practices. Themes developed from this data relate to practicality, farmer values, the importance of local food availability, and the need to reshape consumer interaction and education. The need to expand dairy marketing opportunities and pathways is illustrated through descriptions of farmers’ experiences. This research explores novel perspectives of how the confluence of perceived value and practicality of alternative management practices can contribute to the long-term sustainability and viability of the dairy food system in the Northeast.
Voluntary organizations as well as churches rely heavily on Christian volunteers, yet research on their motivation delivers conflicting answers and limited guidance. This paper applies a comprehensive (2,485 records screened) scoping review-based approach mapping 79 empirical studies (1989–2026) on Christian volunteer motivation across church and civil society projects. Using the UN Volunteers 2020 framework, we analyze (i) study designs, theoretical lenses, instruments, (ii) volunteer populations, and (iii) project settings. We identify three structural barriers to cumulative knowledge: heterogeneous and often implicit motivation concepts; an instrument–phenomenon mismatch that sidelines religious motives (notably through uncritical reliance on the Volunteer Functions Inventory); and systematic underreporting of key participant and context variables. These gaps account for much of the contradictory evidence and restrict its practical use. We outline concrete reporting and measurement standards to integrate religious motives into mainstream volunteering research and to improve evidence-informed management of Christian volunteers.
This Element has three main aims. First, the authors wish to synthesize research on language teacher psychology to provide state-of-the-art insights into the topic and identify possible avenues of scholarship. They do so by adopting a trilogy of mind perspective, which helps organize aspects of teacher psychology into three domains: cognition, affect, and motivation. Second, the overview of the literature outlines key issues, identifies gaps in current understandings and scholarship, and it also introduces less common constructs (e.g., flow, collective efficacy beliefs, and attributions) to inspire future research in this area. Third, the authors intend to reflect on practical implications for practitioners, language teacher educators, preservice teachers, and policymakers of the research to date. Rather than offering a definitive account, the authors seek to open dialogue and encourage further research and practice to ensure language teachers in all contexts receive the recognition and thus support they deserve.
Understanding chicken cognition is essential for improving welfare in production systems, as it reveals how animals perceive and respond to their environment. Barren housing can compromise welfare, including negative affective states and cognitive deficits, but previous research mostly focused on effects of barren environments on young animals. Here, we investigated whether hens moved to battery cages once adults show lower cognitive performance than those kept cage-free. Because stable inter-individual differences (personality traits) can modulate how animals respond to environmental changes, we also explored whether personality modulates this effect. Sixty hens were reared in enriched aviary pens; at 18 weeks, half were transferred to battery cages (456 cm² per hen) and the rest remained cage-free (5,333 cm² per hen) for 64 days before testing. Personality was assessed through four standardised tests, and spatial memory was evaluated with a modified hole-board task. Working memory (WM), general working memory (GWM), and reference memory (RM) were calculated from visit ratios. Behaviours after birds consumed all baited rewards were recorded to assess responses to reward omission (e.g. extinction learning). Battery hens outperformed cage-free hens in all memory metrics and were more active during the post-reward period, showing more empty-cup visits. While the enhanced memory performance of battery hens is likely driven by increased reward motivation and greater engagement with the task, our results also suggest these birds showed a deficit in extinction learning. Personality also influenced performance: more fearful hens had lower WM and GWM and were slower to find baited cups. Housing and personality jointly shaped cognition in laying hens, highlighting that enhanced performance under poor conditions may not indicate better welfare, but rather a shift in motivation for food rewards.
Anhedonia is defined as a reduced interest in or inability to experience pleasure from reward-related activities. Recent studies have demonstrated deficient effort-based motivation in anhedonia, but the neural dynamics underlying the interface between effort and reward remain unclear.
Methods
To address this issue, we recruited an anhedonia (ANH) group (N = 40) and a control (CNT) group (N = 40) to complete two tasks: (1) an effort–reward task where participants earned varying rewards by exerting different levels of physical effort and (2) an effort-based decision-making task where they chose between a no-effort option for a smaller reward and a high-effort option for a larger reward. We recorded EEG during both tasks and analyzed the resulting neural responses.
Results
As expected, the ANH group showed reduced reward responses in both self-reported ratings and event-related potential (ERP) data in response to cue stimuli (indexed by the cue-P3) and reward feedback (indexed by the reward positivity). Importantly, the ANH group exhibited inefficient integration between effort and reward, showing an absent effort-discounting effect on the feedback-P3 during reward evaluation and a lack of reward-related theta modulation during effort-based decision-making.
Conclusions
Our findings suggest a neurodynamic motivation model in anhedonia that informs precise interventions for relevant neuropsychiatric disorders.
Traditional leadership theories often portray influence as stable traits or behaviors, yet complex organizations require leadership to be understood as an emergent, feedback-driven process that co-evolves with contextual demands and follower motivation. This study conceptualizes servant leadership as a nonlinear, adaptive process rather than a fixed style, integrating Complexity Leadership Theory with the Job Demands Resources model and Regulatory Focus Theory. Servant leadership is theorized as an enabling mechanism through which shifting job demands and resources are translated into employees’ promotion and prevention orientations, shaping person-job fit, satisfaction, intrinsic motivation, initiative, and experienced responsibility. Using a two-phase longitudinal design, Phase 1 tested simple and serial mediation with structural equation modeling, and Phase 2 employed a cross-lagged panel model to examine reciprocal feedback dynamics. Results support a four-path process in which servant leadership differentially activates promotion and prevention focus and participates in ongoing feedback loops.
The chapter provides historical background on the 2nd and 3rd Ukrainian Fronts before the summer of 1944. It examines the profile of the troops. The majority of soldiers in the two army groups were Ukrainians, as the Red Army recruited heavily in the field as it marched across Ukraine while suffering high casualties. The chapter discusses soldiers’ experiences in the 1930s and the brutal German occupation. It argues that the recruits were treated brutally by the Soviet command, who viewed them with suspicion for having lived under German occupation. Recruits who survived initial engagements were eventually integrated into the military and served loyally. They did so out of patriotism broadly understood, a sense of national identity that aligned with the Kremlin’s narrative of Ukrainians as a subgroup of the great Russian nation, a wish for social and economic advancement through military service, a desire for revenge against the Germans and, importantly, lack of viable alternatives.
Management practices in the nonprofit sector have been changing over the last decade. Many nonprofit organizations are now mimicking the management techniques of for-profit organizations. Referring to prevailing economic, psychological, and management theories, this paper deals with pay-for-performance plans and specifies reasons for their introduction into nonprofit organizations. The determinants of pay-for-performance effectiveness are analyzed with special emphasis on the motivational determinants. The results of the analysis are incorporated into a model of pay-for-performance effectiveness. Referring to theoretical reasoning as well as empirical studies, this paper analyzes how the motivational determinants of pay-for-performance effectiveness are coined in different types of nonprofit organizations. The paper ends with a discussion in which the author presents an alternative explanation for the introduction of pay-for-performance plans into nonprofit organizations and some suggestions for future research.