We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This report investigates excess frame count during radiotherapy sessions using Elekta Versa HD systems with X-ray Volume Imaging (XVI) technology at Singleton Hospital. The hospital has 4 clinical linear accelerators (linacs) with XVI, which were analysed to identity variations in the number of excess frames between machines and imaging protocols. Such deviations could affect imaging dose accuracy, patient safety, and system efficiency.
Method:
XVI log files were gathered from each linac over an 18-month period using data backups. A Python script was created to read and link all the required data in a simple format to generate histograms and tables.
Results:
The excessive frames resulted in increased radiation doses. Although individual doses were negligible, the highest excess dose for a single patient was 0.7 mSv in 1 fraction, leading to a total dose of 3.4 mSv instead of the expected 2.7 mSv scans which is equivalent to 3 months of background radiation extra. The study revealed that 1.7 % of all imaging sessions were affected (417 imaging fractions). It was identified that the ‘Fast’ Breast imaging protocols were more likely to generate excess frames, likely to be due to the increased gantry speed.
Conclusion:
Despite the small individual doses, the findings raise concerns about system performance and patient safety for imaging, emphasising the need for further investigation to ensure optimal treatment accuracy and compliance with the Ionising Radiation (Medical Exposure) (Amendment) 2024), Regulation 11 and 12.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.