To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Provide a systematic overview of assessment approaches for treatment decisions after internal contamination with plutonium, americium, or curium and the efficacy of decorporation treatment with diethylenetriamine pentaacetate (DTPA) among humans and animals.
Methods
MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched until December 06, 2023. Controlled experimental animal studies and human studies were eligible. Hand search of relevant reports continued until December 24, 2024. Risk of bias was assessed with the OHAT and JBI critical appraisal tools. Narrative synthesis was performed.
Results
A total of 37 studies and 1 report were included. Two studies reported averted dose in humans following DTPA ranging from 150 μSv to 1.1 Sv, but the contribution of rapid contamination assessments to treatment decisions was unclear. Numerous outcomes across different treatment schedules and observation periods were studied in animal populations. Studies provided very low certainty evidence of positive treatment effects.
Conclusions
Whether rapid dose assessment contributes to timely treatment decisions could not be assessed with the limited amount of informative studies. In animal studies, DTPA treatment seems to be effective in reducing radiation burden and other proximal outcomes, but risk of bias is high. Evidence for humans is based on a small number of case studies where reductions in body burden have been reported.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.