To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Intonation units (IUs) are a fundamental prosodic unit of all known human languages, and as such they likely constitute an absolute universal property of language. IUs are chunks defined by a specific pattern of syllable delivery, together with resets in pitch and articulatory force. In this chapter we discuss IUs from four different perspectives and introduce them within the context of rhythms of speech, language, and the brain. First, we provide a detailed description of how IUs are defined. Second, we review linguistic research on the roles of IUs in communication, including their cross-linguistic applicability. This body of research suggests that IUs provide a universal structural cue for the cognitive dynamics of speech production and comprehension at a timescale of ~1 Hz. Third, we synthesize the linguistic perspective with findings from the study of brain rhythms and cognition. Finally, we review the existing algorithmic tools for IU identification from speech acoustics, to facilitate the incorporation of IUs in experimental and quantitative research.
Recent studies have shown that neural activity tracks the syntactic structure of phrases and sentences in connected speech. This work has sparked intense debate, with some researchers aiming to account for the effect in terms of the overt or imposed prosodic properties of the speech signal. In this chapter, we present four types of arguments against attempts to explain putatively syntactic tracking effects in prosodic terms. The most important limitation of such prosodic accounts is that they are architecturally incomplete, as prosodic information does not arise in speech autonomously. Prosodic and syntactic structure are interrelated, so prosodic cues are informative about the intended syntactic analysis, and syntactic information can be used to aid speech perception. Rather than trying to attribute neural tracking effects exclusively to one linguistic component, we consider it more fruitful to think about ways in which the interaction between the components drives the neural signal.
Nonepileptic seizures are behavioral events that look to other people like epileptic seizures or are events that create internal sensations that may also occur in people who have epileptic seizures. This chapter focuses on psychogenic nonepileptic seizures, which are referred to simply as nonepileptic seizures. The patient with nonepileptic seizures may have a history of having experienced one or more significant traumatic events, such as sexual or physical abuse. Electroencephalogram (EEG) monitoring is the best way to make an accurate diagnosis of nonepileptic seizures. This test involves recording the brain rhythms of the patient for a prolonged period, typically for one or more days, usually in the hospital and while video images of the patient are also being recorded. Treatment begins when the results of EEG monitoring (including the findings of the provocative tests, if done) are discussed with the patient.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.