We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Although carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid artery stenting (CAS) is recommended for symptomatic extracranial carotid stenosis of 50–99%, the COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted resources. CAS therefore offered potential advantages as access to the angiosuite was seemingly easier than access to operating rooms. The primary objective was to determine the frequency of serious and non-serious complications following CAS before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods:
We performed a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients who received CAS at the Ottawa Hospital, Canada, from June 2019 to May 2021. We reviewed baseline demographics, imaging, as well as intraprocedural and postprocedural complications based on chart review. We performed multivariable logistic regression to determine associations between clinical and safety outcomes.
Results:
We included 47 patients in the pre-pandemic period and 93 patients in the pandemic period (mean age = 70.4 years; 54% female; P = 0.287 for age and P = 0.962 for sex, respectively). The combined rate of intraprocedural and postprocedural serious complications (ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, myocardial infarction or death) was 7.1%. Eight strokes occurred, and one patient with a postprocedural ischemic stroke died 11 days after stenting. Complication rates were similar before and during the pandemic (aOR 1.040, 95% CI 0.466–2.321). The number of referrals for CEA during the pandemic period decreased by 50%.
Conclusion:
In this cohort of consecutive patients undergoing CAS at a Canadian comprehensive stroke center before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, the rates of stroke and death were similar to pre-pandemic conditions and were generally consistent with the published literature.
Acute ischemic stroke is a medical emergency. The initial evaluation of the potential stroke patient often occurs in a high-acuity area. Medical personnel responsible for establishing intravenous access, initiating cardiorespiratory monitoring, performing blood draws, and performing electrocardiography compete for the patient's attention. Additionally, the presence of aphasia or neglect may limit the patient's ability to provide accurate information. The neurological examination should focus on identifying signs of lateralized hemispheric or brainstem dysfunction consistent with stroke. The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) is a validated scale that has gained widespread acceptance as a standard clinical assessment tool. The chapter discusses evidence-based ischemic stroke treatment strategies. Determination of stroke mechanism and prompt initiation of secondary stroke preventative strategies such as anti-thrombotic therapy, aggressive risk-factor management, and carotid revascularization in carefully selected patients provide an opportunity to reduce the future burden of stroke.
This chapter reviews the major clinical trials on carotid endarterectomy and carotid angioplasty, and summarizes the technique used by the authors for carotid endarterectomy. The evolution of carotid endarterectomy, carotid angioplasty, and stenting and extracranial-intracranial (EC-IC) has been predicated on the results of clinical trials. The EC-IC bypass trial introduced the concept of multicenter prospective randomized trials to the neurosurgical community. The ongoing carotid revascularization endarterectomy versus stent trial (CREST) is prospectively randomizing patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis to either carotid endarterectomy or carotid angioplasty, and stenting with distal embolic protection (DEP), regardless of perioperative risk stratification. Assessing perioperative risk is essential in the evaluation of patients in whom carotid endarterectomy, carotid angioplasty and stenting or EC-IC bypass is being considered. Patients with symptomatic carotid occlusions may benefit from EC-IC revascularization provided they suffer from diminished cerebrovascular reserve.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.