We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The technological development of radiotherapy equipment enabled the changing of the dose rate over time during irradiation. Further, techniques, such as volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), are becoming more widespread. This study aimed to assess the changes in radiation isocenter and beam alignment with different dose rates and investigate the dose error during VMAT plan delivery.
Method:
The Winston–Lutz (WL) test and three-dimensional water phantom profiles were measured at different dose rates using 4, 6 and 10 MV and flattening filter-free (FFF) at 6 and 10 MV of X-rays. Furthermore, the change in alignment with the dose rate was reproduced through beam parameter adjustments, and the change in dose difference (DD) in the VMAT plan was assessed.
Results:
The WL test revealed a 0·1–0·3 mm radiation isocenter displacement with dose rate. Further, the beam profile measurement results demonstrated a 0·3 mm beam centre position displacement in both the lateral and gun-target directions caused by the change in dose rate. VMAT plan delivery with a beam whose centre position changed by 0·3 mm caused a 0·2–3% decrease in the previous DD rate.
Conclusion:
The radiation isocenter and beam alignment changed based on the dose rate. Evaluating the change in beam alignment at multiple dose rates is recommended when performing irradiation with different dose rates.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.