Wild oat is a problematic weed species that requires new managementtechniques in the face of herbicide resistance; harvest weed-seed control(HWSC) may be an option. Wild oat demographic information was collected inlong-term, rotational field studies in Lacombe, AB, Canada, in 2006 and2007, and a periodic matrix model was parameterized using managementextremes (no IPM, no herbicide to high IPM, and full herbicide). Populationgrowth rates were calculated for each treatment and year. Prospective(elasticity) and retrospective (LTRE) analyses were conducted alongside arearrangement of the model equation in which population growth rates weredesignated and the required proportion of newly shed seed survival thatgives that growth rate was solved for. All populations had λ > 1 orincreasing populations. Elasticity analyses indicated that λ was most-highlyelastic to the overwinter seedbank (Esw = 1), followed by seedling survival, fecundity, and survival ofnewly shed seed (0.63 to 0.86 across treatments). The latter may be themost-accessible vital rate for management of herbicide resistantpopulations. LTRE exposed the stochasticity of wild oat population growthrates between years and their ability to take advantage of lapses incontrol. Decreasing the proportion of newly shed seeds(snew) that survives was the most-effective and available controlstrategy until reduced to 0.1 to 0.3 when the summer seedbank becomes morecritical. When averaged across treatments, > 80% of newly shed seed mustbe eliminated to stop the population from growing, resulting in a stablepopulation, but not a decline. Because of preharvest shattering, HWSC willlikely not be effective enough alone to cause wild oat populations todecline. New management techniques for wild oat control that can be used incombination with HWSC and integrated weed management strategies areneeded.