We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Precise stratification of patients into homogeneous disease subgroups could address the heterogeneity of phenotypes and enhance understanding of the pathophysiology underlying specific subtypes. Existing literature on subtyping patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) mainly utilized clinical features only. Genomic and imaging data may improve subtyping, but advanced methods are required due to the high dimensionality of features.
Methods
We propose a novel disease subtyping framework for MDD by integrating brain structural features, genotype-predicted expression levels in brain tissues, and clinical features. Using a multi-view biclustering approach, we classify patients into clinically and biologically homogeneous subgroups. Additionally, we propose approaches to identify causally relevant genes for clustering.
Results
We verified the reliability of the subtyping model by internal and external validation. High prediction strengths (PS) (average PS: 0.896, minimum: 0.854), a measure of generalizability of the derived clusters in independent datasets, support the validity of our approach. External validation using patient outcome variables (treatment response and hospitalization risks) confirmed the clinical relevance of the identified subgroups. Furthermore, subtype-defining genes overlapped with known susceptibility genes for MDD and were involved in relevant biological pathways. In addition, drug repositioning analysis based on these genes prioritized promising candidates for subtype-specific treatments.
Conclusions
Our approach successfully stratified MDD patients into subgroups with distinct clinical prognoses. The identification of biologically and clinically meaningful subtypes may enable more personalized treatment strategies. This study also provides a framework for disease subtyping that can be extended to other complex disorders.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.