Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

2 results

  • Phonology as coding: An online tool for teaching and developing analyses

  • Daniel A. Kaufman, Raphael Finkel, Cynthia Gan
  • Journal:
    Language / Volume 102 / Issue 1 / March 2026
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    10 April 2026, pp. 198-222
    • Article
      • You have access
      • Open access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

  • The Phonomaton, a public web-facing facility, computes phonological derivations based on a user’s underlying representations and rules. The tool allows a formal implementation of phonological analyses using familiar methods and lets students interactively explore the mechanics of feature systems and serial derivations. We demonstrate a number of the program’s features and end with a discussion of its implementation in the classroom.

  • 1 - Generative Approaches to Bilingual Phonetics and Phonology

  • from Part I - Approaches to Bilingual Phonetics and Phonology
  • Edited by Mark Amengual, University of California, Santa Cruz
  • Book:
    The Cambridge Handbook of Bilingual Phonetics and Phonology
    Published online:
    14 November 2024
    Print publication:
    21 November 2024, pp 23-43

  • Summary

    Generative phonologists share the goal of modeling the internalized grammars that allow members of a linguistic community to produce and understand utterances they have not previously encountered. But while most generativists assume that the internalized grammar maps lexical to surface representations, they may disagree on the nature of that mapping, the makeup of the mental representations of phonological structure, and the role of universal well-formedness constraints in grammar. This chapter surveys analyses of data from multilinguals, foreign language learners, and loanword adapters within different generative models, exploring both strengths and limitations of competing approaches. Issues addressed include the role of phonological vs. phonetic structure, the relationship between the production grammar and the perception grammar, and the role of putative innate learning biases vs. factors such as input frequency and perceptual salience.