Intergenerational transmission of mental disorders has been well established, but it is unclear whether exposure to a child's mental disorder increases parents' subsequent risk of mental disorders.

We examined the association of mental disorders in children with their parents' subsequent mental disorders.

In this population-based cohort study, we included all individuals with children born in Finland or Denmark in 1990–2010. Information about mental disorders was acquired from national registers. The follow-up period began when the parent's eldest child was 5 years old (for ICD-10 codes F10–F60) or 1 year old (for codes F70–F98) and ended on 31 December 2019 or when the parent received a mental disorder diagnosis, died, or emigrated from Finland or Denmark. The associations of mental disorders in children with their parents' subsequent mental disorders were examined using Cox proportional hazards models.

The study cohort included 1 651 723 parents. In total, 248 328 women and 250 763 men had at least one child who had been diagnosed with a mental disorder. The risk of a parent receiving a mental disorder diagnosis was higher among those who had a child with a mental disorder compared with those who did not. For both parents, the hazard ratios were greatest in the first 6 months after the child's diagnosis (hazard ratio 2.04–2.54), followed by a subtle decline in the risk (after 2 years, the hazard ratio was 1.33–1.77).

Mental disorders in children are associated with a greater risk of subsequent mental disorders among their parents. Additional support is needed for parents whose children have been recently diagnosed with a mental disorder.

Personal independence payment (PIP) is a benefit that covers additional daily living costs people may incur from a long-term health condition or disability. Little is known about PIP receipt and associated factors among people who access mental health services, and trends over time. Individual-level data linking healthcare records with administrative records on benefits receipt have been non-existent in the UK.

To explore how PIP receipt varies over time, including PIP type, and its association with sociodemographic and diagnostic patient characteristics among people who access mental health services.

A data-set was established by linking electronic mental health records from the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust with administrative records from the Department for Work and Pensions.

Of 143 714 working-age patients, 37 120 (25.8%) had received PIP between 2013 and 2019, with PIP receipt steadily increasing over time. Two in three patients (63.2%) had received both the daily living and mobility component. PIP receipt increased with age. Those in more deprived areas were more likely to receive PIP. The likelihood of PIP receipt varied by ethnicity. Patients diagnosed with a severe mental illness had 1.48 odds (95% CI 1.42–1.53) of having received PIP, compared with those with a different psychiatric diagnosis.

One in four people who accessed mental health services had received PIP, with higher levels seen among those most likely in need, as indicated by a severe mental illness diagnosis. Future research using this data-set could explore the average duration of PIP receipt in people who access mental health services, and re-assessment patterns by psychiatric diagnosis.

Clozapine is the most effective medication for treatment-resistant psychoses, but the balance of benefits and risks is understudied in real-world settings.

To examine the relative re-hospitalisation rates for mental health relapse and adverse events associated with clozapine and other antipsychotics in adult and child/youth cohorts.

Data were obtained from the Canadian Institute of Health Information for adults (n = 45 616) and children/youth (n = 1476) initially hospitalised for mental health conditions in British Columbia, Manitoba and Saskatchewan from 2008 to 2018. Patient demographics and hospitalisations were linked with antipsychotic prescriptions dispensed following the initial visit. Recurrent events survival analysis for relapse and adverse events were created and compared between clozapine and other antipsychotics.

In adults, clozapine was associated with a 14% lower relapse rate versus other drugs (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.83–0.90) over the 10-year follow-up. In the first 21 months, the relapse rate was higher for clozapine but then reversed. Over 1000 person-months, clozapine-treated adults could be expected to have 38 relapse hospitalisations compared with 45 for other drugs. In children/youth, clozapine had a 38% lower relapse rate compared with other antipsychotic medications (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.49–0.78) over the follow-up period. This equates to 29 hospitalisations for clozapine and 48 for other drugs over 1000 person-months. In adults, clozapine had a higher risk for adverse events (hazard ratio: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.18–1.54) over the entire follow-up compared with other antipsychotics. This equates to 1.77 and 1.30 hospitalisations over 1000 person-months for clozapine and other drugs, respectively.

Clozapine was associated with lower relapse overall, but this was accompanied by higher adverse events for adults. For children/youth, clozapine was associated with lower relapse all throughout and had no difference in adverse events compared with other antipsychotics.

Genetically informed studies have provided mixed findings as to what extent parental substance misuse is associated with offspring substance misuse and antisocial behavior due to shared environmental and genetic factors.

We linked data from nationwide registries for a cohort of 2 476 198 offspring born in Sweden 1958–1995 and their parents. Substance misuse was defined as International Classification of Diseases diagnoses of alcohol/drug use disorders or alcohol/drug-related criminal convictions. Quantitative genetic offspring-of-siblings analyses in offspring of monozygotic and dizygotic twin, full-sibling, and half-sibling parents were conducted.

Both maternal and paternal substance misuse were robustly associated with offspring substance misuse [maternal adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 1.83 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.80–1.87); paternal aHR = 1.96 (1.94–1.98)] and criminal convictions [maternal aHR = 1.56 (1.54–1.58); paternal aHR = 1.66 (1.64–1.67)]. Additive genetic effects explained 42% (95% CI 25–56%) and 46% (36–55%) of the variance in maternal and paternal substance misuse, respectively, and between 36 and 44% of the variance in substance misuse and criminality in offspring. The associations between parental substance misuse and offspring outcomes were mostly due to additive genetic effects, which explained 54–85% of the parent-offspring covariance. However, both nuclear and extended family environmental factors also contributed to the associations, especially with offspring substance misuse.

Our findings from a large offspring-of-siblings study indicate that shared genetic influences mostly explain the associations between parental substance misuse and both offspring substance misuse and criminality, but we also found evidence for the contribution of environmental factors shared by members of nuclear and extended families.

This study examined two competing hypotheses concerning the association between diabetes and treatment for depression: (1) the detection/ascertainment bias hypothesis suggesting that those with diabetes are more likely to be diagnosed with and treated for depression because of increased medical attention and (2) a hypothesis assuming that diabetes and depression share common underlying pathophysiological pathways.

The study population included all persons aged 35–65 years in Finland with any record of type 2 diabetes in the national health and population registers from 1999 to 2002 and for whom register-based data on depression treatment (antidepressant medication use and hospitalizations for depression) were available at least 2 years before and after the diagnosis of diabetes (n = 18 217). Sociodemographic data were individually linked to the study population. Associations between diabetes diagnosis and time and indicators of depression care were assessed with population-averaged multilevel logistic models.

Within the year following diagnosis diabetes, there was a 5% increase in antidepressant medication use but not in hospitalization for depression. The longitudinal change in antidepressant use over time was less steep after the diabetes diagnosis, and hospitalization risk decreased after the diagnosis. These associations between diabetes diagnosis and depression treatment were not modified by the participant's socio-economic position (SEP).

These findings support the common cause hypothesis that treatment for diabetes is beneficial to the prevention of depression rather than the detection/ascertainment hypothesis that individuals with diabetes have higher rates of depression because they receive more medical attention in general.