There is increasing emphasis on reducing the use and improving the safety of mechanical restraint (MR) in psychiatric settings, and on improving the quality of evidence for outcomes. To date, however, a systematic appraisal of evidence has been lacking.

We included studies of adults (aged 18–65) admitted to inpatient psychiatric settings. We included primary randomised or observational studies from 1990 onwards that reported patterns of MR and/or outcomes associated with MR, and qualitative studies referring to an index admission or MR episode. We presented prevalence data only for studies from 2010 onwards. The risk of bias was assessed using an adapted checklist for randomised/observational studies and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for interventional studies.

We included 83 articles on 73 studies from 1990–2022, from 22 countries. Twenty-six studies, from 11 countries, 2010 onwards, presented data from on proportions of patients/admissions affected by MR. There was wide variation in prevalence (<1–51%). This appeared to be mostly due to variations in standard protocols between countries and regions, which dictated use compared to other restrictive practices such as seclusion. Indications for MR were typically broad (violence/aggression, danger to self or property). The most consistently associated factors were the early phase of admission, male sex, and younger age. Ward and staff factors were inconsistently examined. There was limited reporting of patient experience or positive effects.

MR remains widely practiced in psychiatric settings internationally, with considerable variation in rates, but few high-quality studies of outcomes. There was a notable lack of studies investigating different types of restraint, indications, clinical factors associated with use, the impact of ethnicity and language, and evidence for outcomes. Studies examining these factors are crucial areas for future research. In limiting the use of MR, some ward-level interventions show promise, however, wider contextual factors are often overlooked.

There is an established association between serious mental illness and violence. Secure forensic psychiatric services provide care and treatment to mentally disordered offenders. The majority of patients in forensic services suffer from severe mental illnesses such as schizophrenia, with co-morbid polysubstance abuse and maladaptive personality traits. Psychiatric services are under significant pressure to reduce the use of seclusion and restrictive practices, whilst mandated to provide safe environments for patients and staff.

To determine the number and characteristics of violent incidents in a secure forensic hospital in Ireland.

A retrospective review of all incidents in Central Mental Hospital, Ireland between 1st March 2019 and 31st August 2021 was completed. Incidents were categorised into physical assaults and other violent incidents. Demographic measures and measures of violence risk (HCR-20), functioning (GAF), programme completion and recovery (DUNDRUM tool) were collated.

A total of 321 incidents took place during the period examined, of which 47 (14.6%) involved physical assaults perpetrated by patients. Between March 2020 and August 2021, numbers of assaults increased by 50% and 78% compared to the preceding six-month period respectively. The majority of assaults were committed by a relatively small group of patients. Victims of assaults were more likely to be patients (n=27, 57.4%) and more likely to be males (n=43, 91.9%).

Physical assaults and other violent incidents happen in forensic and general psychiatric units. Restrictive practices, used in accordance with the law, are necessary at times to prevent serious harm to patients and staff in psychiatric hospitals.

No significant relationships.