Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-2bdfx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-01T03:52:41.421Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Asymptotic-analysis-inspired boundary conditions aiming at eliminating polymer diffusive instability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 September 2025

Ming Dong*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Nonlinear Mechanics, Institute of Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, PR China
Dongdong Wan
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, National University of Singapore, 9 Engineering Drive 1, Singapore 117575, Republic of Singapore
*
Corresponding author: Ming Dong, dongming@imech.ac.cn

Abstract

The recent discovery of polymer diffusive instability (PDI) by Beneitez et al. (2023 Phys. Rev. Fluids 8, L101901), poses challenges in implementing artificial conformation diffusion (ACD) in transition simulations of viscoelastic wall-shear flows. In this paper, we demonstrate that the unstable PDI is primarily induced by the conformation boundary conditions additionally introduced in the ACD equation system, which could be eliminated if a new set of conformation conditions is adopted. To address this issue, we begin with an asymptotic analysis of the PDI within the near-wall thin diffusive layer, which simplifies the complexity of the instability system by reducing the number of the controlling parameters from five to zero. Then, based on this simplified model, we construct a stable asymptotic solution that minimises the perturbations in the wall sublayer. From the near-wall behaviour of this solution, we derive a new set of conformation boundary conditions, prescribing a Neumann-type condition for its streamwise stretching component, $c_{11}$, and Dirichlet-type conditions for all the other conformation components. These boundary conditions are subsequently validated within the original ACD instability system, incorporating both the Oldroyd-B and the finitely extensible nonlinear elastic Peterlin constitutive models. Finally, we perform direct numerical simulations based on the traditional and the new conformation conditions, demonstrating the effectiveness of the latter in eliminating the unstable PDI. Importantly, this improvement does not affect the calculations of other types of instabilities. Therefore, this work offers a promising approach for achieving reliable polymer-flow simulations with ACD, ensuring both numerical stability and accuracy.

Information

Type
JFM Papers
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abramowitz, M. & Stegun, I.A. 1964 Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs and Mathematical Tables. National Bureau of Standards.Google Scholar
Alves, M.A., Oliveira, P.J. & Pinho, F.T. 2021 Numerical methods for viscoelastic fluid flows. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 53, 509541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beneitez, M., Mrim, S. & Kerswell, R. 2025 Linear instability in planar viscoelastic Taylor–Couette flow with and without explicit polymer diffusion. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 345, 105459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beneitez, M., Page, J., Dubief, Y. & Kerswell, R. 2024 Transition route to elastic and elasto-inertial turbulence in polymer channel flows. Phys. Rev. Fluids 9, 123302.10.1103/PhysRevFluids.9.123302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beneitez, M., Page, J. & Kerswell, R. 2023 Polymer diffusive instability leading to elastic turbulence in plane Couette flow. Phys. Rev. Fluids 8, L101901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, R., Curtiss, C., Armstrong, R. & Hassager, O. 1987 Dynamics of Polymeric Liquids, Volume 2: Kinetic Theory. Wiley.Google Scholar
Couchman, M., Beneitez, M., Page, J. & Kerswell, R. 2024 Inertial enhancement of the polymer diffusive instability. J Fluid Mech. 981, A2.10.1017/jfm.2024.21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dong, M. & Zhang, M. 2022 Asymptotic study of linear instability in a viscoelastic pipe flow. J. Fluid Mech. 935, A28.10.1017/jfm.2022.24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubief, Y., Terrapon, V.E. & Hof, B. 2023 Elasto-inertial turbulence. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 55, 675705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garg, P., Chaudhary, I., Khalid, M., Shankar, V. & Subramanian, G. 2018 Viscoelastic pipe flow is linearly unstable. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 024502.10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.024502CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Groisman, A. & Steinberg, V. 2000 Elastic turbulence in a polymer solution flow. Nature 405, 5355.10.1038/35011019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ji, X., Dong, M. & Zhao, L. 2023 Impact of compliant coating on Mack-mode evolution in hypersonic boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 974, A1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewy, T. & Kerswell, R. 2024 The polymer diffusive instability in highly concentrated polymeric fluids. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 326, 105212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malik, M.R. 1990 Numerical methods for hypersonic boundary layer stability. J. Comput. Phys. 86, 376413.10.1016/0021-9991(90)90106-BCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mavrantzas, V.G. & Beris, A.N. 1999 A hierarchical model for surface effects on chain conformation and rheology of polymer solutions. II. Application to a neutral surface. J. Chem. Phys. 110, 628.10.1063/1.478120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samanta, D., Dubief, Y., Holzner, M., Schäfer, C., Morozov, A.N., Wagner, C. & Hof, B. 2013 Elasto-inertial turbulence. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 1055710562.10.1073/pnas.1219666110CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanchez, H.A., Jovanovic, M.R., Kumar, S., Morozov, A., Shankar, V., Subramanian, G.Wilson, H.J. 2022 Understanding viscoelastic flow instabilities: Oldroyd-B and beyond. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 302, 104742.10.1016/j.jnnfm.2022.104742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shenkar, A., McMullen, R.M., McKeon, B.J. & Graham, M.D. 2021 Tollmien–Schlichting route to elastoinertial turbulence in channel flow. Phys. Rev. Fluids 6, 093301.10.1103/PhysRevFluids.6.093301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, R. & Dong, M. 2023 Linear instability of a supersonic boundary layer over a rotating cone. J. Fluid Mech. 955, A31.10.1017/jfm.2022.1087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, V. 2021 Elastic turbulence: an experimental view on inertialess random flow. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 53, 2758.10.1146/annurev-fluid-010719-060129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, G., Wan, D. & Zhang, M. 2021 Nonlinear evolutions of streaky structures in viscoelastic pipe flows. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 295, 104622.10.1016/j.jnnfm.2021.104622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sureshkumar, R. & Beris, A.N. 1995 Effect of artificial stress diffusivity on the stability of numerical calculations and the flow dynamics of time-dependent viscoelastic flows. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 60, 5380.10.1016/0377-0257(95)01377-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, M. 2021 Energy growth in viscoelastic pipe flows. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 294, 104581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, M., Lashgari, I., Zaki, T. & Brandt, L. 2013 Linear stability analysis of channel flow of viscoelastic Oldroyd-B and FENE-P fluids. J. Fluid Mech. 737, 249279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar