Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-vdhp9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-14T04:48:20.595Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gay Rights in the States: Public Opinion and Policy Responsiveness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2009

JEFFREY R. LAX  and
JUSTIN H. PHILLIPS
JEFFREY R. LAX*
Affiliation:
Columbia University
JUSTIN H. PHILLIPS*
Affiliation:
Columbia University
*
Jeffrey R. Lax is Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Columbia University, 7th Floor, International Affairs Bldg., 420 W. 118th Street, New York, NY 10027 (JRL2124@columbia.edu).
Justin H. Phillips is Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Columbia University, 7th Floor, International Affairs Bldg., 420 W. 118th Street, New York, NY 10027 (JHP2121@columbia.edu).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We study the effects of policy-specific public opinion on state adoption of policies affecting gays and lesbians, and the factors that condition this relationship. Using national surveys and advances in opinion estimation, we create new estimates of state-level support for eight policies, including civil unions and nondiscrimination laws. We differentiate between responsiveness to opinion and congruence with opinion majorities. We find a high degree of responsiveness, controlling for interest group pressure and the ideology of voters and elected officials. Policy salience strongly increases the influence of policy-specific opinion (directly and relative to general voter ideology). There is, however, a surprising amount of noncongruence—for some policies, even clear supermajority support seems insufficient for adoption. When noncongruent, policy tends to be more conservative than desired by voters; that is, there is little progay policy bias. We find little to no evidence that state political institutions affect policy responsiveness or congruence.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 103 , Issue 3 , August 2009 , pp. 367 - 386
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Achen, Christopher H. 1978. “Measuring Representation.” American Journal of Political Science 22 (3): 475–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Religion Data Archive. 1990. http://www.thearda.com/Google Scholar
Arceneaux, Kevin. 2002. “Direct Democracy and the Link between Public Opinion and State Abortion Policy.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 2 (4): 372–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, Douglas. 2005. “Fitting Linear Models in R Using the lme4 Package.” R News 5 (1): 27–30.Google Scholar
Berry, William D., Ringquist, Evan J., Fording, Richard C., and Hanson, Russell L.. 1998. “Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States, 1960–93.” American Journal of Political Science 42 (1): 327–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brace, Paul, Sims-Butler, Kellie, Arceneaux, Kevin, and Johnson, Martin. 2002. “Public Opinion in the American States: New Perspectives Using National Survey Data.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (1): 173–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, William J. 1977. “State Constitutions and the Protection of Individual Rights.” Harvard Law Review 90 (3): 489–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, Paul R., and Wilcox, Clyde. 2005. “The Polls—Trends: Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions.” Public Opinion Quarterly 69 (4): 599–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burstein, Paul. 1981. “The Sociology of Democratic Politics and Government.” Annual Review of Sociology 7: 291–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burstein, Paul. 2003. “The Impact of Public Opinion on Policy: A Review of an Agenda.” Political Research Quarterly 56 (1): 29–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, Timothy E. 1999. “The Empirical Study of Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Politics: Assessing the First Wave of Research.” American Political Science Review 93 (3): 679–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorris, John B. 1999. “Antidiscrimination Laws in Local Government: A Public Policy Analysis of Municipal Lesbian and Gay Public Employment Protection.” In Public Policy, Public Opinion, and Political Representation, eds. Riggle, Ellen D. B. and Tadlock, Barry L.. NY: Columbia University.Google Scholar
Druckman, James N., and Jacobs, Lawrence R.. 2006. “Lumpers and Splitters: The Public Opinion Information that Politicians Collect and Use.” Public Opinion Quarterly 70 (4): 453–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, Robert S., Wright, Gerald C., and McIver, John P.. 1993. Statehouse Democracy: Public Opinion and Policy in the American States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gelman, Andrew, and Hill, Jennifer. 2007. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel-Hierarchical Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gelman, Andrew, and Little, Thomas C.. 1997. “Poststratification into Many Categories Using Hierarchical Logistic Regression.” Survey Methodology 23 (2): 127–35.Google Scholar
Gerber, Elisabeth R. 1996. “Legislative Response to the Threat of the Popular Initiative.” American Journal of Political Science 40: 99–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, John C. 2000. “Antigay: Varieties of Opposition to Gay Rights.” In The Politics of Gay Rights, eds. Rimmerman, Craig, Wald, Kenneth D., and Wilcox, Clyde. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Haider-Markel, Donald P. 2001. “Policy Diffusion as a Geographical Expansion of the Scope of Political Conflict: Same-Sex Marriage Bans in the 1990s.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 1 (1): 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haider-Markel, Donald P., and Kaufman, Matthew S.. 2006. “Public Opinion and Policy Making in the Culture Wars: Is There a Connection Between Opinion and State Policy on Gay and Lesbian Issues?” In Public Opinion in State Politics, ed. Cohen, Jeffrey E.. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.Google Scholar
Haider-Markel, Donald P., and Meier, Kenneth J.. 1996. “The Politics of Gay and Lesbian Rights: Expanding the Scope of the Conflict.” Journal of Politics 58 (2): 332–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haider-Markel, Donald P., and Meier, Kenneth J.. 2003. “Legislative Victory, Electoral Uncertainty: Explaining Outcomes in the Battles over Lesbian and Civil Rights.” Review of Policy Research 20 (4): 671–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haider-Markel, Donald P., Querze, Alana, and Lindaman, Kara. 2007. “Lose, Win, or Draw? A Reexamination of Direct Democracy and Minority Rights.” Political Research Quarterly 60 (2): 304–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, Gregory A., and Gordon, Sanford C.. 2004. “Accountability and Coercion: Is Justice Blind When It Runs for Office?” American Journal of Political Science 48 (2): 247–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kane, Melinda D. 2003. “Social Movement Policy Success: Decriminalizing State Sodomy Laws 1969–1998.” Mobilization: The International Journal of Research in Social Movements, Protest, and Contentious Politics 8 (3): 313–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LascherEdward L., Jr. Edward L., Jr., Hagen, Michael G., and Rochlin, Steven A.. 1996. “Gun Behind the Door: Ballot Initiatives, State Policies and Public Opinion.” Journal of Politics 58 (August): 76075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence v. Texas. 2003. 539 U.S. 558.Google Scholar
Lax, Jeffrey R., and Phillips, Justin H.. 2009. “How Should We Estimate Public Opinion in the States?” American Journal of Political Science 53 (1): 107–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupia, Arthur, Krupnikov, Yanna, Levine, Adam Seth, Piston, Spencer, and Von Hagen-Jamar, Alexander. 2009. “Why State Constitutions in their Treatment of Same-Sex Marriage.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maestas, Cherie. 2000. “Professional Legislatures and Ambitious Politicians: Policy Responsiveness of State Institutions.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 25 (4): 663–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsusaka, John G. 2001. “Problems with a Methodology Used to Evaluate the Voter Initiative.” Journal of Politics 63 (4): 12506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayhew, David. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Monroe, Alan D. 1998. “Public Opinion and Policy, 1980–1993.” Public Opinion Quarterly 62: 6–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norrander, Barbara. 2000. “The Multi-Layered Impact of Public Opinion on Capital Punishment Implementation in the American States.” Political Research Quarterly 53: 771–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norrander, Barbara. 2001. “Measuring State Public Opinion with the Senate National Election Study.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 1 (1): 111–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norrander, Barbara. 2007. “Choosing Among Indicators of State Public Opinion.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 7 (2): 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, Benjamin I., and Shapiro, Robert Y.. 1983. “The Effects of Public Opinion on Policy.” American Political Science Review 77 (1): 175–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, David K., Gelman, Andrew, and Bafumi, Joseph. 2006. “State Level Opinions from National Surveys: Poststratification Using Multilevel Logistic Regression.” In Public Opinion in State Politics, ed. Cohen, Jeffrey E.. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald N. 2008. Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soule, Sarah A. 2004. “Going to the Chapel? Same-Sex Marriage Bans in the United States, 1973–2000.” Journal of Social Problems 51 (4): 453–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soule, Sarah A., and Earl, Jennifer. 2001. “The Enactment of State-Level Hate Crime Law in the United States: Intrastate and Interstate Factors.” Sociological Perspectives 44 (3): 281–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squire, Peverill. 2007. “Measuring State Legislative Professionalism: The Squire Index Revisited.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 7 (2): 211–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stimson, James A., MacKuen, Michael B., and Erikson, Robert S.. 1995. “Dynamic Representation.” American Political Science Review 89: 543–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Clive S., and Hrebenar, Ronald J.. 2008. “Interest Groups in the States.” In Politics in the American States: A Comparative Analysis. 9th ed., eds. Gray, Virginia, Hanson, Russell L., and Jacob, Herbert. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Treadway, Jack M. 1985. Public Policymaking in the States. NY: Praeger.Google Scholar
Wald, Kenneth D., Button, James W., and Rienzo, Barbara A.. 1996. “The Politics of Gay Rights in American Communities: Explaining Antidiscrimination Ordinances and Policies.” American Journal of Political Science 40 (4): 1152–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.