Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-rxvq6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-14T08:58:10.579Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Crossing the boundary between humans and animals: the extinct fox Dusicyon avus from a hunter-gatherer mortuary context in Patagonia (Argentina)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 January 2015

Luciano Prates
Luciano Prates*
Affiliation:
Conicet. Museo de La Plata, Paseo del bosque s/n, La Plata – 1900, Argentina
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The discovery of a grave of the late second millennium BC containing an extinct South American fox, Dusicyon avus, at Loma de los Muertos raises intriguing questions about the relationship between wild canids and humans. This sub-adult individual appears to have been buried in a human mortuary context in a comparable manner to adjacent human burials. It may have been kept as a pet and been considered part of the human social group. The ability of pets, especially canids, to leave the animal world and enter into a special relationship with people may be related to the cosmology of South American hunter-gatherers.

Keywords

PatagoniacanidDusicyon avusgrave goodsanimal burialshousehold animals

Information

Type
Research
Information
Antiquity , Volume 88 , Issue 342 , December 2014 , pp. 1201 - 1212
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Acosta, A., Loponte, D. & García Esponda, C.. 2011. Primer registro de perro doméstico prehispánico (Canis familiaris) entre los grupos cazadores recolectores del humedal de Paraná inferior (Argentina). Antípoda 13: 175–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.7440/antipoda13.2011.09 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barreto, O. 1992. Fenomenología de la religiosidad mapuche. Bahía Blanca: Centro Salesiano de Estudios ‘San Juan Bosco’.Google Scholar
Behrens, H. 1964. Die neolithisch-frühmetallzeitlichen Tierskelettfunde der Alten Welt. Berlin: Veb Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Behrensmeyer, A.K. 1978. Taphonomic and ecologic information from bone weathering. Paleobiology 4(2): 150–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belotti López De Medina, C. 2012. En compañía de los muertos, ofrendas de animales en los cementerios de La Isla (Tilcara, Jujuy). Intersecciones en Antropología 13: 345–57.Google Scholar
Berón, M.A. 2010. Vínculo ritual entre el perro doméstico y el hombre en los cazadores-recolectores de la Pampa occidental, in Gutiérrez, M.A., De Nigris, M., Fernández, P.M., Giardina, M., Gil, A.F., Izeta, A., Neme, G. & Yacobaccio, H.D. (ed.) Zooarqueología a principios del siglo XXI: aportes teóricos, metodológicos y casos de estudio: 543–50. Buenos Aires: Espinillo.Google Scholar
Bonomo, M. 2006. Un acercamiento a la dimensión simbólica de la cultura material en la región Pampeana. Relaciones de la Sociedad Argentina de Antropología 31: 89–115.Google Scholar
Bórmida, M. & Siffredi, A.. 1969–1970. Mitología de los Tehuelches Meridionales. Runa XII(1–2): 199–245.Google Scholar
Borrero, L.A. 2009. The elusive evidence: the archaeological record of the South American extinct megafauna, in Haynes, G. (ed.) American megafaunal extinctions at the end of the Pleistocene: 145–68. Reno (NV): Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8793-6_8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brantingham, P.J. 1998. Hominid–carnivore coevolution and invasion of the predatory guild. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 17: 327–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jaar.1998.0326 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brightman, R.A. 1993. Grateful prey: Rock Cree human-animal relationships. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2009. Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon dates. Radiocarbon 51: 337–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, L. 2005. Planting the bones: hunting ceremonialism at contemporary and nineteenth-century shrines in the Guatemalan highlands. Latin American Antiquity 16: 131–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/30042808 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casamiquela, R. 1988. En pos del Gualicho. Buenos Aires: Eudeba.Google Scholar
Clutton-Brock, J. 2012. Animals as domesticates. A world view through history. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.Google Scholar
Coppinger, R. & Coppinger, L.. 2001. Dogs: a new understanding of canine origin, behavior, and evolution. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Crockford, S.J. 2000. Dogs through time: an archaeological perspective. Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
Descola, P. 2002. Antropología de la naturaleza. Lima: IFEA.Google Scholar
Ekengren, F. 2013. Contextualizing grave goods: theoretical perspectives and methodological implications, in Tarlow, S. & Nilsson Stutz, L. (ed.) The Oxford handbook of the archaeology of death and burial: 173–92. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Erikson, P. 1988. Apprivoisement et habitat chez les Amerindiens Matis (langue Pano, Amazonas, Bresil). Anthropozoologica 9: 25–35.Google Scholar
Erikson, P. 2000. The social significance of pet-keeping among Amazonian Indians, in Podberseck, P. & Serpell, J. (ed.) Companion animals and us: exploring the relationships between people and pets: 7–26. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fausto, C. 2007. Feasting on people: eating animals and humans in Amazonia. Current Anthropology 48: 497–530. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/518298 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernández, P.M., Cruz, I. & Forlano, A.. 2010. Sitio 37: una madriguera de carnívoro en el norte de la Patagonia Andina (Cholila, Provincia de Chubut, Argentina), in Gutiérrez, M.A., De Nigris, M., Fernández, P.M., Giardina, M., Gil, A.F., Izeta, A., Neme, G. & Yacobaccio, H.D. (ed.) Zooarqueología a principios del siglo XXI: aportes téoricos, metodológicos y casos de estudio: 409–17. Buenos Aires: Espinillo.Google Scholar
FernáNdez Distel, A., Cámara Hernández, J. & Miante Alzogaray, A.M.. 1995. Estudio del maíz arqueológico de Huachichocana 2, provincia de Jujuy, noroeste de Argentina. Relaciones de la Sociedad Argentina de Antropología 20: 101–27.Google Scholar
Groves, C.P. 1999. The advantages and disadvantages of being domesticated. Perspectives in Human Biology 4: 1–12.Google Scholar
Hare, B., Plyusnina, I., Ignacio, N., Schepina, O., Stepika, A., Wrangham, R. & Trut, L.N.. 2005. Social cognitive evolution in captive foxes is a correlated by-product of experimental domestication. Current Biology 15: 226–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2005.01.040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, T. 1935. Observaciones sobre vocablos indios. Publicaciones del Museo de Antropología y Etnografía 3: 59–69.Google Scholar
Hernández, G.H. 2003. Orden cósmico, roles de género y relaciones interétnicas en la mitología Tehuelche. Cuadernos del Sur Historia 32: 195–219.Google Scholar
Hernando, A., Politis, G. & González Ruibal, A.. 2011. Gender, power, and mobility among the awá-guajá (Maranhão, Brazil). Journal of Anthropological Research 67: 189–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, E. 2000. The contextual analysis of animal interments and ritual practice in southwestern North America. Kiva 65: 361–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ingold, T. 1998. Totemism, animism, and the depictions of animals, in Seppälä, M., Vanhala, J.-P. & Weintraub, L. (ed.) Animal, anima, animus: 181–207. Pori: PoriArt Museum.Google Scholar
Jennbert, K. 2003. Animal graves: dog, horse and bear. Current Swedish Archaeology 11: 139–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lezcano, M., Hajduk, A. & Albornoz, A.M.. 2010. El menú a la carta en el bosque ¿entrada o plato principal?: una perspectiva comparada desde la zooarqueología del sitio El Trébol (Parque Nacional Nahuel Huapi, Río Negro), in Gutiérrez, M.A., De Nigris, M., Fernández, P.M., Giardina, M., Gil, A.F., Izeta, A., Neme, G. & Yacobaccio, H.D. (ed.) Zooarqueología a principios del siglo XXI: aportes teóricos, metodológicos y casos de estudio: 243–57. Buenos Aires: Espinillo.Google Scholar
Llarás Samitier, M. 1950. Primer ramillete de fábulas y sagas de los antiguos patagones. Runa III(1–2): 170–99.Google Scholar
Losey, R.J., Bazaliiskii, V., Garvie-Lok, S., Germonpré, M., Leonard, J.A., Allen, A.L., Katzenberg, M.A. & Sablin, M.V.. 2011. Canid as a person: early Neolithic dog and wolf burials, Cis-Baikal, Siberia. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 30: 174–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaa.2011.01.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maher, L.A., Stock, J.T., Finney, S., Heywood, J.J.N., Miracle, P. T. & Banning, E.B.. 2011. A unique human-fox burial from a pre-Natufian cemetery in the Levant (Jordan). PLoS ONE 6: e15815. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015815 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, F.M. 1998. Madrigueras, dormideros y letrinas: aproximación a la tafonomía de zorros, in Borrero, L.A (ed.) Arqueología de la Patagonia Meridional (Proyecto ‘Magallania’): 73–96. Concepción del Uruguay: Búsqueda de Ayllu.Google Scholar
Massone, M. 2004. Los cazadores después del hielo. Ediciones de la Dirección de Archivos y Museos 7: 1–183.Google Scholar
Mondini, M. 2004. Accumulation of small and large vertebrates by carnivores in Andean South America, in Brugal, J.P. & Desse, J. (ed.) Petits animaux et sociétés humaines. Du complément alimentaire aux ressources utilitaires, XXIV Rencontres Internationales d’Archéologie et d’Histoire d’Antibes: 513–17. Antibes: APDCA.Google Scholar
Morey, D.F. 2006. Burying key evidence: the social bond between dogs and people. Journal of Archaeological Science 33: 158–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2005.07.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, J. 2011. Investigating animal burials. Ritual, mundane and beyond (British Archaeological Reports British series 535). Oxford: Archaeopress.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muñozovalle, I. 1983. Hallazgo de un Alouatta seniculus en el Valle de Azapa. Estudio preliminar de la iconografía de simios en Arica. Chungará 10: 39–46.Google Scholar
Pardiñas, U.F.J. 1999. Tafonomía de microvertebrados en yacimientos arqueológicos de Patagonia (Argentina). Arqueología 9: 265–340.Google Scholar
Parker Pearson, M.P. 1999. The archaeology of death and burial. Stroud: Sutton.Google Scholar
Politis, G. 2007. Nukak: ethnoarchaeology of an Amazonian people. Walnut Creek (CA): Left Coast.Google Scholar
Politis, G., Guitiérrez, M.A. & Scabuzzo, C. (ed.). 2014. Estado actual de las investigaciones en el sitio 2 de Arroyo Seco (región pampeana, Argentina) (Serie Monográfica INCUAPA 5). Olavarría: INCUAPA.Google Scholar
Prates, L., Prevosti, F.J. & Berón, M.A.. 2010a. First records of Prehispanic dogs in southern South America (Pampa-Patagonia, Argentina). Current Anthropology 51: 173–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/650166 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prates, L., Di Prado, V., Mange, E. & Serna, A.. 2010b. Sitio Loma de los Muertos. Múltiples ocupaciones sobre un médano del este de Norpatagonia (Argentina). Magallania 38: 163–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-22442010000100010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prevosti, F.J., Santiago, F., Prates, L. & Salemme, M.. 2011. Constraining the time of extinction of the South American fox Dusicyon avus (Carnivora, Canidae) during the late Holocene. Quaternary International 245: 209–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2011.02.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reimer, P.J., Bard, E., Bayliss, A., Beck, J.W., Blackwell, P.G., Bronk Ramsey, C., Buck, C.E., Cheng, H., Edwards, R.L., Friedrich, M., Grootes, P.M., Guilderson, T.P. Haflidason, H., Hajdas, I., Hatté, C., Heaton, T.J., Hoffmann, D.L., Hogg, A.G., Hughen, K.A. Kaiser, K.F., Kromer, B., Manning, S.W., Niu, M., Reimer, R.W., Richards, D.A., Scott, E.M., Southon, J.R., Staff, R.A., Turney, C.S.M. & Van Der Plicht, J.. 2013. IntCal13 and Marine13 radiocarbon age calibration curves 0–50,000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon 55: 1869–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.2458/azujsrc.55.16947 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reitz, E.J. & Wing, E.S.. 2008. Zooarchaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511841354 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russel, N. 2002. The wild side of animal domestication. Society and Animals 10: 285–302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156853002320770083 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandweiss, D. & Wing, E.S. 1997. Ritual rodents: the guinea pigs of Chincha, Perú. Journal of Field Archaeology 24: 47–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/jfa.1997.24.1.47 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiffer, M. 1987. Formation processes of the archaeological record. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Schleidt, W.M. & Shalter, M.D.. 2003. Co-evolution of humans and canids. An alternative view of dog domestication: homo homini lupus? Evolution and Cognition 9(1): 57–72.Google Scholar
Stahl, P.W. 2012. Interactions between humans and endemic canids in Holocene South America. Journal of Ethnobiology 32(1): 108–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.2993/0278-0771-32.1.108 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trut, L.N. 1999. Early canid domestication: the farm-fox experiment. American Scientist 87: 160–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ucko, P.J. 1969. Ethnography and archaeological interpretation of funerary remains. World Archaeology 1: 262–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00438243.1969.9979444 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vigne, J.-D, Guilaine, J., Debue, K., Haye, L. & Gérard, P.. 2004. Early taming of the cat in Cyprus. Science 304: 259. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1095335 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, W. 1995. Ceremonial trash?, in Skibo, J.M., Walker, W.H. & Nielsen, A.E. (ed.) Expanding archaeology: 67–79. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.Google Scholar
Wing, E.S. 1989. Human use of canids in the central Andes, in Redford, K.H. & Eisenberg, J.F. (ed.) Advances in Neotropical mammalogy: 265–78. Gainesville (FL): Sandhill Crane.Google Scholar