Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-wvcvf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-21T15:45:38.039Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Explanatory Typologies in Qualitative Studies of International Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2005

Colin Elman
Colin Elman
Affiliation:
Arizona State University, Tempe, colin.elman@asu.edu
Get access

Abstract

Explanatory typologies are powerful tools in the qualitative study of international politics. They are likely to be most valuable when scholars systematically apply shared techniques. This article provides an account of analytic steps used in working with typologies, and an accessible vocabulary to describe them. These analytic steps are illustrated with concrete examples drawn from prominent versions of offensive structural, defensive structural, and neoclassical realism. Five forms of cell compression—rescaling and indexing, as well as logical, empirical, and pragmatic compression—are considered, along with the drawbacks associated with each. The expansion of a partial typology and the rediscovery of deleted cells are also discussed. Finally, the article considers the potential drawbacks of a typological approach, and argues that scholars must be mindful of the risks of reification and of relabeling anomalies.I am especially grateful to David Collier for extensive critiques of several drafts of this article. Stephen G. Walker, Miriam Fendius Elman, James Mahoney, Gary Goertz, Reilly O'Neal, John Gerring, Bear Braumoeller, Lisa Martin, two anonymous reviewers, and the participants at the January 2004 Institute for Qualitative Research Methods at Arizona State University provided valuable comments. An earlier version of this article was presented at the 2004 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. Ryan Davis, Michael Jensen and Mallory Hutchison provided greatly appreciated research assistance. Templates for dichotomous and trichotomous four-variable property spaces are available from colin.elman@asu.edu.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
International Organization , Volume 59 , Issue 2 , April 2005 , pp. 293 - 326
Copyright
© 2005 The IO Foundation and Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Albrow, Martin. 1990. Max Weber's Construction of Social Theory. New York: St. Martin's Press.
Aminzade, Ronald. 1992. Historical Sociology and Time. Sociological Methods and Research 20 (4):456–80.Google Scholar
Bailey, Kenneth D. 1972. Polythetic Reduction of Monothetic Property Space. Sociological Methodology 4:83–111.Google Scholar
Bailey, Kenneth D. 1973. Monothetic and polythetic typologies and their relation to conceptualization measurement, and scaling. American Sociological Review 38 (1):18–33.Google Scholar
Bailey, Kenneth D. 1992. Typologies. In Encyclopedia of Sociology, edited by Edgar F. Borgatta and Marie L. Borgatta, 2188–94. New York: Macmillan.
Bailey, Kenneth D. 1994. Typologies and Taxonomies: An Introduction to Classification Techniques. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.
Barton, Allen H. 1955. The concept of property-space in social research. In Language of Social Research, edited by Paul F. Lazarsfeld and Morris Rosenberg, 40–53. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press.
Bates, Robert H., Avner Greif, Margaret Levi, Jean-Laurent Rosenthal, and Barry R. Weingast. 1998. Analytic Narratives. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Becker, Howard. 1940. Constructive Typology in the Social Sciences. In Contemporary Social Theory, edited by Harry E. Barnes, Howard Becker, and Frances Bennett Becker, 17–46. New York: D. Appleton-Century.
Bennett, Andrew. 1999a. Causal Inference in Case Studies: From Mill's Methods to Causal Mechanisms. Paper presented at the 96th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, September, Atlanta, Ga.
Bennett, Andrew. 1999b. Condemned to Repetition: The Rise, Fall, and Reprise of Soviet-Russian Military Interventionism 1973–1996. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Bennett, Andrew, Aharon Barth, and Ken Rutherford. 2003. Do We Preach What We Practice? A Survey of Methods in Political Science Journals and Curricula. PS 36 (3):373–78.Google Scholar
Bennett, Andrew, and Alexander George. 2001. Case Studies and Process Tracing in History and Political Science: Similar Strokes for Different Foci. In Bridges and Boundaries: Historians, Political Scientists and the Study of International Relations, edited by Colin Elman and Miriam Fendius Elman, 137–66. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Biddle, Stephen. 2001. Rebuilding the Foundations of Offense-Defense Theory. Journal of Politics 63 (3):741–74.Google Scholar
Brady, Henry E. 2002. Models of Causal Inference: Going Beyond the Neyman-Rubin-Holland Theory. Paper presented at the 16th Annual Meeting of the Political Methodology Group, July, Seattle, Wash.
Brady, Henry, and David Collier, eds. 2004. Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, and James D. Morrow. 1999. Sorting Through the Wealth of Notions. International Security 24 (2):56–73.Google Scholar
Burger, Thomas. 1987. Max Weber's Theory of Concept Formation. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.
Burger, Thomas. 2001. Ideal Types: Conceptions in the Social Sciences. In International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, edited by Neil J. Smelser and Paul B. Baltes, 7139–42. New York: Elsevier.
Buthe, Tim. 2002. Taking Temporality Seriously: Modeling History and the Use of Narrative as Evidence. American Political Science Review 96 (3):481–93.Google Scholar
Capecchi, Vittorio. 1968. On the Definition of Typology and Classification in Sociology. Quality and Quantity 2 (1–2):9–30.Google Scholar
Carrier, Martin. 1988. On Novel Facts: A Discussion of Criteria for Non-ad-hoc-ness in the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 19 (2):205–31.Google Scholar
Clarke, S. 2001. Idealization, Abstraction and Ideal Types. In International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, edited by Neil J. Smelser and Paul B. Baltes, 7142–48. New York: Elsevier.
Collier, David, and Robert Adcock. 1999. Democracy and Dichotomies: A Pragmatic Approach to Choices about Concepts. Annual Review of Political Science 2:537–65.Google Scholar
Collier, David, and Steven Levitsky. 1997. Democracy with Adjectives: Conceptual Innovation in Comparative Research. World Politics 49 (3):430–51.Google Scholar
Collier, David, and James E. Mahon. 1993. Conceptual ‘Stretching’ Revisited: Adapting Categories in Comparative Analysis. American Political Science Review 87 (4):845–55.Google Scholar
Copeland, Dale. 2000. The Origins of Major War. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Eckstein, Harry. 1975. Case Study and Theory in Political Science. In Handbook of Political Science, edited by Fred Greenstein and Nelson Polsby, 79–137. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
Elman, Colin. 2004. Extending Offensive Realism: The Louisiana Purchase and America's Rise to Regional Hegemony. American Political Science Review 98 (4):563–76.Google Scholar
Elman, Colin, and Miriam Fendius Elman. 2002. Appraising Progress in International Relations Research: How Not to Be Lakatos Intolerant. International Studies Quarterly 46 (2):231–62.Google Scholar
Elman, Colin, and Miriam Fendius Elman, eds. 2003. Progress in International Relations Theory: Metrics and Methods of Scientific Change. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Fearon, James D. 1991. Counterfactuals and Hypothesis Testing in Political Science. World Politics 43 (2):169–95.Google Scholar
Fearon, James D. 1995. Rationalist Explanations for War. International Organization 49 (3):379–414.Google Scholar
Frankel, Henry. 1979. The Career of Continental Drift Theory: An Application of Imre Lakatos' Analysis of Scientific Growth to the Rise of Drift Theory. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 10 (1):21–66.Google Scholar
Gardner, Michael R. 1982. Predicting Novel Facts. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 33 (1):1–15.Google Scholar
George, Alexander L., and Andrew Bennett. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Gerring, John. 1999. What Makes a Concept Good? A Criterial Framework for Understanding Concept Formation in the Social Sciences. Polity 31 (3):357–93.Google Scholar
Gerring, John. 2001. Social Science Methodology: A Criterial Framework. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Glaser, Charles L. 1994/1995. Realists as Optimists: Cooperation as Self-Help. International Security 19 (3):50–90.Google Scholar
Glaser, Charles L. 1997. The Security Dilemma Revisited. World Politics 50 (1):171–201.Google Scholar
Glaser, Charles L., and Chaim Kaufmann. 1998. What Is the Offense-Defense Balance and Can We Measure It? International Security 22 (4):44–82.Google Scholar
Goertz, Gary, and James Mahoney. Forthcoming. Two Level Theories and Fuzzy Sets. Sociological Methods & Research.
Hands, D. Wade. 1991. Reply to Hamminga and Maki. In Appraising Economic Theories: Studies in the Methodology of Research Programs, edited by Neil de Marchi and Mark Blaug, 91–102. Brookfield, Vt.: Edward Elgar.
Hekman, Susan J. 1983. Weber's Ideal Type: A Contemporary Reassessment. Polity 16 (1):119–37.Google Scholar
Hempel, Carl G. 1965a. Fundamentals of Taxonomy. In Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science, edited by Carl G. Hempel, 137–54. New York: Free Press.
Hempel, Carl G. 1965b. Typological Methods in the Natural and Social Sciences. In Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science, edited by Carl G. Hempel, 155–71. New York: Free Press.
Hempel, Carl G., and P. Oppenheim. 1936. Der Typusbegriff im Lichte der Neuen Logik. Leiden, Netherlands: A. W, Siythoff.
Jervis, Robert. 1985. Pluralistic Rigor: A Comment on Bueno de Mesquita. International Studies Quarterly 29 (2):145–49.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Robert O. Keohane, and Sidney Verba. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Koertge, Noretta. 1971. Inter-Theoretic Criticism and the Growth of Science. In Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Volume 8: PSA 1970, edited by Roger C. Buck and Robert S. Cohen, 160–73. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Reidel.
Lakatos, Imre. 1970. Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. In Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, edited by Imre Lakatos and Alan Musgrave, 91–196. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lakatos, Imre, and Elie Zahar. 1975. Why Did Copernicus' Research Programme Supersede Ptolemy's? In The Copernican Achievement, edited by Robert S. Westman, 354–83. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Lazarsfeld, Paul F. 1937. Some remarks on the typological procedures in social research. Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung 6:119–39.Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld, Paul F., and Allen H. Barton. 1965. Qualitative Measurement in the Social Sciences: Classification, Typologies, and Indices. In The Policy Sciences, edited by Daniel Lerner and Harold D. Lasswell, 155–92. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
Lindbekk, Tore. 1992. The Weberian Ideal-Type: Development and Continuities. Acta Sociologica 35 (4):285–97.Google Scholar
Lynn-Jones, Sean M. 1995. Offense-Defense Theory and Its Critics. Security Studies 4 (4):660–91.Google Scholar
Lynn-Jones, Sean M. 2001. Does Offense-Defense Theory Have a Future? Working Paper. Montreal, Canada: Research Group in International Security (REGIS)/Groupe d'étude et de recherche sur la sécurité internationale (GERSI).
Mahoney, James. 2000. Path Dependence in Historical Sociology. Theory and Society 29 (4):507–48.Google Scholar
Mahoney, James, and Dietrich Rueschemeyer, eds. 2003. Comparative-Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Marradi, Alberto. 1990. Classification, Typology, Taxonomy. Quality and Quantity 24 (2):129–57.Google Scholar
Martin, Lisa L. 1999. The Contributions of Rational Choice: A Defense of Pluralism. International Security 24 (2):74–83.Google Scholar
Mastanduno, Michael. 1997. Preserving the Unipolar Moment: Realist Theories and U.S. Grand Strategy after the Cold War. International Security 21 (4):49–88.Google Scholar
Mayo, Deborah G. 1996. Error and the Growth of Experimental Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
McIntosh, Donald. 1977. The Objective Bases of Max Weber's Ideal Types. History and Theory 16 (3):265–79.Google Scholar
McKeown, Timothy J. 2004. Case Studies and the Limits of the Statistical Worldview. In Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards, edited by Henry E. Brady and David Collier, 139–67. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.
McKinney, John C. 1950. The Role of Constructive Typology in Scientific Sociological Analysis. Social Forces 28 (3):235–40.Google Scholar
McKinney, John C. 1954. Constructive Typology and Social Research. In An Introduction to Social Research, edited by John T. Doby, 139–98. Harrisburg, Penn.: Stackpole.
McKinney, John C. 1957. The Polar Variables of Type Construction. Social Forces 35 (4):300–6.Google Scholar
McKinney, John C. 1966. Constructive Typology and Social Theory. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
McKinney, John C. 1969. Typification, Typologies and Sociological Theory. Social Forces 48 (1):1–12.Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, John J. 1990. Back to the Future: Instability in Europe After the Cold War. International Security 15 (1):5–56.Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, John J. 1994/1995. The False Promise of International Institutions. International Security 19 (3):5–49.Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, John J. 1995. A Realist Reply. International Security 20 (1):82–93.Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, John J. 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: Norton.
Midford, Paul. 2002. The Logic of Reassurance and Japan's Grand Strategy. Security Studies 11 (3):1–43.Google Scholar
Morrow, James D. 2002. International Conflict: Assessing the Democratic Peace and Offense-Defense Theory. In Political Science: State of the Discipline, edited by Ira Katznelson and Helen V. Milner, 172–96. New York: Norton.
Munck, Gerardo. 2004. Tools for Qualitative Research. In Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards, edited by Henry E. Brady and David Collier, 105–21. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.
Musgrave, Alan. 1974. Logical versus Historical Theories of Confirmation. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25 (1):1–23.Google Scholar
Musgrave, Alan. 1978. Evidential Support, Falsification, Heuristics, and Anarchism. In Progress and Rationality in Science, edited by Gerard Radnitzky and Gunnar Andersson, 181–201. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Reidel.
Niou, Emerson M. S., and Peter C. Ordeshook. 1999. Return of the Luddites. International Security 24 (2):84–96.Google Scholar
Nowotny, Helga. 1971. The Uses of Typological Procedures in Qualitative Macrosociological Studies. Quality and Quantity 6 (1):3–37.Google Scholar
Nunan, Richard. 1984. Novel Facts, Bayesian Rationality, and the History of Continental Drift. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 15 (4):267–307.Google Scholar
Paul, T. V. 1994. Asymmetric Conflicts: War Initiation by Weaker Powers. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Pierson, Paul. 2000. Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics. American Political Science Review 94 (2):251–67.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2003. Big, Slow-Moving, and … Invisible: Macro-Social Processes in the Study of Comparative Politics. In Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, edited by James Mahoney and Dietrich Rueschemeyer, 177–207. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Powell, Robert. 1999. The Modeling Enterprise and Security Studies. International Security 24 (2):97–106.Google Scholar
Powell, Robert. 2002. Game Theory, International Relations Theory and the Hobbesian Stylization. In Political Science: The State of the Discipline, edited by Ira Katznelson and Helen V. Milner, 755–83. New York: Norton.
Przeworski, Adam, and Henry Teune. 1970. The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York: Wiley Interscience.
Ragin, Charles. C. 1987. The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Ragin, Charles. C. 2000. Fuzzy Set Social Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rogers, Rolf E. 1969. Max Weber's Ideal Type Theory. New York: Philosophical Library.
Rogowski, Ronald. 2004. How Inference in the Social (but Not the Physical) Sciences Neglects Theoretical Anomaly. In Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards, edited by Henry E. Brady and David Collier, 75–83. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.
Rose, Gideon. 1998. Review Article: Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy. World Politics 51 (1):144–72.Google Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. 1970. Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics. American Political Science Review 64 (4):1033–53.Google Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. 1984. Guidelines for Concept Analysis. In Social Science Concepts: A Systematic Analysis, edited by Giovanni Sartori, 15–85. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications.
Sartori, Giovanni. 1994. Compare Why and How: Comparing, Miscomparing and the Comparative Method. In Comparing Nations: Concepts, Strategies, Substance, edited by Mattei Dogan and Ali Kazancigil, 14–34. Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell.
Schweller, Randall L. 1993. Tripolarity and the Second World War. International Studies Quarterly 37 (1):73–103.Google Scholar
Schweller, Randall L. 1994. Bandwagoning for Profit: Bringing the Revisionist State Back in. International Security 19 (1):72–107.Google Scholar
Schweller, Randall L. 1996. Neorealism's Status-Quo Bias: What Security Dilemma? Security Studies 5 (3):90–121.Google Scholar
Schweller, Randall L. 1998. Deadly Imbalances: Tripolarity and Hitler's Strategy of World Conquest. New York: Columbia University Press.
Schweller, Randall L. Forthcoming. Unanswered Threats: Political Constraints on the Balance of Power. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Stevens, S. S. 1946. On the Theory of Scales of Measurement. Science 103 (2684):677–80.Google Scholar
Stevens, S. S. 1951. Mathematics, Measurement, and Psychophysics. In Handbook of Experimental Psychology, edited by S. S. Stevens, 1–49. New York: John Wiley.
Stevens, S. S. 1959. Measurement, Psychophysics, and Utility. In Measurement: Definitions and Theories, edited by C. West Churchman and Philipburn Ratoosh, 18–63. New York: John Wiley.
Stinchecombe, Arthur L. 1987. Constructing Social Theories. Reprint, originally published 1968 by Harcourt, Brace & World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Tetlock, Philip E., and Aaron Belkin. 1996. Counterfactual Thought Experiments in World Politics: Logical, Methodological and Psychological Perspectives. In Counterfactual Thought Experiments in World Politics, edited by Philip E. Tetlock and Aaron Belkin, 1–38. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Thelen, Kathleen. 2003. How Institutions Evolve: Insights from Comparative-Historical Analysis. In Comparative-Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, edited by James Mahoney and Dietrich Rueschemeyer, 208–40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tiryakian, Edward A. 1968. Typologies. In International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, edited by David L. Sills, 177–86. New York: Macmillan.
Van Evera, Stephen. 1997. Guide to Methodology for Students of Political Science. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Vasquez, John A. 1997. The Realist Paradigm and Degenerative versus Progressive Research Programs: An Appraisal of Neotraditional Research on Waltz's Balancing Proposition. American Political Science Review 91 (4):899–912.Google Scholar
Walt, Stephen M. 1987. The Origins of Alliances. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Walt, Stephen M. 1988. Testing Theories of Alliance Formation: The Case of Southwest Asia. International Organization 42 (2):275–316.Google Scholar
Walt, Stephen M. 1991. Alliance Formation in Southwest Asia: Balancing and Bandwagoning in Cold War Competition. In Dominoes and Bandwagons, edited by Robert Jervis and Jack Snyder, 51–84. New York: Oxford University Press.
Walt, Stephen M. 1992a. Revolution and War. World Politics 44 (3):321–68.Google Scholar
Walt, Stephen M. 1992b. Alliances, Threats, and U.S. Grand Strategy: A Reply to Kaufman and Labs. Security Studies 1 (3):448–82.Google Scholar
Walt, Stephen M. 1996. Revolution and War. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Walt, Stephen M. 1999. Rigor or Rigor Mortis? Rational Choice and Security Studies. International Security 23 (4):5–48.Google Scholar
Walt, Stephen M. 2000. Containing Rogues and Renegades: Coalition Strategies and Counterproliferation. In The Coming Crisis: Nuclear Proliferation, U.S. Interests, and World Order, edited by Victor A. Utgoff, 191–226. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Walt, Stephen M. 2002. The Enduring Relevance of the Realist Tradition. In Political Science: State of the Discipline, edited by Ira Katznelson and Helen V. Milner, 197–230. New York: Norton.
Waltz, Kenneth N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
Watkins, J. W. N. 1953. Ideal Types and Historical Explanation. In Readings in the Philosophy of Science, edited by H. Feigl and M. Brodbeck, 723–43. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Worrall, John. 1978a. The Ways in Which the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes Improves on Popper's Methodology. In Progress and Rationality in Science, edited by Gerard Radnitzky and Gunnar Andersson, 45–70. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Reidel.
Worrall, John. 1978b. Research Programmes, Empirical Support and the Duhem Problem: Replies to Criticism. In Progress and Rationality in Science, edited by Gerard Radnitzky and Gunnar Andersson, 321–38. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Reidel.
Zagare, Frank C. 1999. All Mortis, No Rigor. International Security 24 (2):107–14.Google Scholar
Zahar, Elie. 1973. Why Did Einstein's Programme Supersede Lorentz's? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 24 (2):95–123.Google Scholar