Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-r6c6k Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-13T01:05:00.979Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Political Economy of Land Privatization in Argentina and Australia, 1810–1850: A Puzzle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 November 2013

Alan Dye
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Economics, Barnard College, Columbia University, 3009 Broadway, New York, NY 10027. E-mail: adye@barnard.edu.
Sumner La Croix
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Economics, University of Hawaii, 2424 Maile Way, Rm. 542, Honolulu, HI 96822. E-mail: lacroix@hawaii.edu.

Abstract

In early public land privatization, governments in New South Wales and Buenos Aires provided for de jure transfer of public lands. In New South Wales the government lost control; squatters rushed out unlawfully and seized de facto frontier claims. But in Buenos Aires privatization was accomplished by de jure transfers. Why did British settlers reject de jure transfers from a government, most able to secure property rights and rule of law, while settlers of the pampa frontier, where property-rights security was doubtful, complied with de jure transfers? We find that the revenue objective and violence on the frontier explain this puzzle.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Supplementary material: File

Dye supplementary material 1

Dye supplementary material 1

Download Dye supplementary material 1(File)
File 316.9 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Dye supplementary material 2

Dye supplementary material 2

Download Dye supplementary material 2(PDF)
PDF 155.8 KB