Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-jhrpq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-17T08:21:25.482Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Organizational Complexity and Succession Planning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Lalitha Naveen
Lalitha Naveen
Affiliation:
lalitha@gsu.edu, Department of Finance, J. Mack Robinson School of Business, Georgia State University, 35 Broad Street, Atlanta, GA 30303.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study uses a large sample of firms to examine how human capital considerations affect the process of CEO succession. Costs and benefits of succession planning are affected by a firm's level of operational complexity and human capital requirements; firms that are more complex incur greater costs to transferring firm-specific knowledge and expertise to an outsider, and should be more likely to groom an internal candidate for the CEO position. Consistent with this, I find that a firm's propensity to groom an internal candidate for the CEO position is related to firm size, degree of diversification, and industry structure. My results also suggest that succession planning is associated with a higher probability of inside succession and voluntary succession and a lower probability of forced succession. I also provide evidence that horizon problems are mitigated to some extent by having a succession plan.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 41 , Issue 3 , September 2006 , pp. 661 - 683
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Agrawal, A.; Knoeber, C.; and Tsoulouhas, T. “Are Outsiders Handicapped in CEO Successions?” Journal of Corporate Finance, forthcoming (2006).Google Scholar
Baliga, B.; Moyer, R.; and Rao, R. “CEO Duality and Firm Performance: What's the Fuss? Strategic Management Journal, 17 (1996), 41–53.Google Scholar
Becker, G.Human Capital Chicago, IL: Univ. of Chicago Press (1964).Google Scholar
Bhagat, S., and Welch, I. “Corporate Research and Development Investments: International Comparisons.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 19 (1995), 443–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonnier, K., and Bruner, R. “An Analysis of Stock Price Reaction to Management Change in Distressed Firms.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 11 (1989), 95–106.Google Scholar
Borokhovich, K.; Parrino, R.; and Trapani, T. “Outside Directors and CEO Selection.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31 (1996), 337–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brickley, J.; Coles, J.; and Jarrell, G. “Leadership Structure: Separating the CEO and Chairman of the Board.” Journal of Corporate Finance, 3 (1997), 189–220.Google Scholar
Brickley, J.; Coles, J.; and Linck, J. “What Happens to CEOs After they Retire? Evidence on Career Concerns and CEO Incentives.” Journal of Financial Economics, 52 (1999), 341–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannella, A. Jr, and Lubatkin, M. “Succession as a Sociopolitical Process: Internal Impediments to Outsider Selection.” Academy of Management Journal, 36 (1993), 763–793.Google Scholar
Carmichael, L. “Firm-Specific Human Capital and Promotion Ladders.” Bell Journal of Economics, 14 (1983), 251–258.Google Scholar
Chan, W. “External Recruitment versus Internal Promotion.” Journal of Labor Economics, 14 (1996), 555–570.Google Scholar
Coles, J.; Daniel, N.; and Naveen, L. “Managerial Incentives and Risk-Taking.” Journal of Financial Economics, 79 (2006), 431–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dechow, P., and Sloan, R. “Executive Incentives and the Horizon Problem.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 14 (1991), 51–89.Google Scholar
Denis, D.; Denis, D.; and Sarin, A. “Ownership Structure and Top Executive Turnover.” Journal of Financial Economics, 45 (1997), 193–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Efron, B., and Tibshirani, R. J.An Introduction to the Bootstrap: Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability, vol. 57. New York, NY: Chapman and Hall (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkelstein, S., and Hambrick, D. “Chief Executive Compensation: A Study of the Intersection of Markets and Political Processes.” Strategic Management Journal, 10 (1989), 121–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furtado, E. “Changes in Senior Management and Their Effects on Stockholder Value.” Unpubl. PhD Diss. (1985).Google Scholar
Furtado, E., and Rozeff, M. “The Wealth Effects of Company Initiated Management Changes.” Journal of Financial Economics, 18 (1987), 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbons, R., and Murphy, K. “Optimal Incentive Contracts in the Presence of Career Concerns: Theory and Evidence.” Journal of Political Economy, 100 (1992), 468–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, W. H. “Gender Economics Courses in Liberal Arts Colleges: Further Results.” Journal of Economic Education, 29 (1998), 291–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, W. H.Econometric Analysis, 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall (2003).Google Scholar
Himmelberg, C., and Hubbard, G. “Incentive Pay and the Market for CEOs: An Analysis of Pay-for-Performance Sensitivity.” Working Paper, Columbia Univ. (2000).Google Scholar
Hirshleifer, D., and Welch, I. “An Economic Approach to the Psychology of Change: Amnesia, Inertia and Impulsiveness.” Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 11 (2002), 379–421.Google Scholar
Huson, M.; Parrino, R.; and Starks, L. “Internal Monitoring Mechanisms and CEO Turnover: A Long Term Perspective.” Journal of Finance, 56 (2001), 2265–2297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaggia, P., and Thakor, A. “Firm-Specific Human Capital and Optimal Capital Structure.” International Economic Review, 35 (1994), 283–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, M., and Warner, J. “The Distribution of Power among Corporate Managers, Shareholders and Directors.” Journal of Financial Economics, 20 (1988), 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazear, E., and Rosen, S. “Rank-Order Tournaments as Optimum Labor Contracts.” Journal of Political Economy, 89 (1981), 841–864.Google Scholar
Margolis, D. N., and Simonnet, V. “Technical/Professional versus General Education, Labor Market Networks and Labor Market Outcomes. Working Paper, Université Paris (2002).Google Scholar
McConnell, J., and Servaes, H. “Additional Evidence on Equity Ownership and Corporate Value.” Journal of Financial Economics, 27 (1990), 595–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morck, R.; Shleifer, A.; and Vishny, R. “Management Ownership and Market Valuation.” Journal of Financial Economics, 20 (1988), 293–315.Google Scholar
Murphy, K., and Zimmerman, J. “Financial Performance Following CEO Turnover.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 16 (1993), 273–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, K. M., and Topel, R. H. “Estimation and Inference in Two-Step Econometric Models.” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 3 (1985), 370–379.Google Scholar
Parrino, R. “CEO Turnover and Outside Succession: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.” Journal of Financial Economics, 46 (1997), 165–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajan, R., and Wulf, J. “The Flattening of the Firm: Evidence on the Changing Nature of Firm Hierarchies from Panel Data.” Working Paper, NBER (2004).Google Scholar
Reinganum, M. “The Effect of Executive Succession on Stockholder Wealth.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 30 (1985), 46–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, N., and Shepard, A. “Firm Diversification and CEO Compensation: Managerial Ability or Executive Entrenchment? RAND Journal of Economics, 28 (1997), 489–514.Google Scholar
Teoh, S.; Welch, I.; and Wong, T. J. “Earnings Management and the Long-Run Market Performance of Initial Public Offerings.” Journal of Finance, 53 (1998), 1935–1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vancil, R. “Passing the Baton: Managing the Process of CEO Succession.” Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press (1987).Google Scholar
Warner, J.; Watts, R.; Wruck, K. “Stock Prices and Top Management Changes.” Journal of Financial Economics, 20 (1988), 461–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisbach, M. “Outside Directors and CEO Turnover.” Journal of Financial Economics, 20 (1988), 431–460.Google Scholar
Yermack, D. “Higher Market Valuation for Companies with a Smaller Board of Directors.” Journal of Financial Economics, 40 (1996), 185–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar