Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-z2ts4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-13T04:47:18.344Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Benchmark Discrepancies and Mutual Fund Performance Evaluation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2021

K. J. Martijn Cremers
Affiliation:
University of Notre Dame Mendoza College of Business mcremers@nd.edu
Jon A. Fulkerson
Affiliation:
University of Dayton School of Business Administration jfulkerson1@udayton.edu
Timothy B. Riley*
Affiliation:
University of Arkansas Walton College of Business
*
tbriley@uark.edu (corresponding author)

Abstract

We introduce a new holdings-based procedure to identify whether a mutual fund has a benchmark discrepancy, which we define as a benchmark other than the prospectus benchmark best matching a fund’s investment strategy. We find that funds with a benchmark discrepancy tend to be riskier than their prospectus benchmarks indicate. As a result, the funds on average outperform their prospectus benchmarks, before further risk adjustments, despite underperforming the benchmarks that best match their portfolios.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Supplementary material: PDF

Cremers et al. supplementary material

Cremers et al. supplementary material 1

Download Cremers et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 870.5 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Cremers et al. supplementary material

Cremers et al. supplementary material 1

Download Cremers et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 1.9 MB