No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Lattice Boltzmann modelling of molecular interaction governing multiphase flow in nanoporous media
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 May 2026
Abstract
Understanding multiphase flow in nanoconfined spaces is essential for a wide range of scientific and engineering applications. In these systems, strong fluid–fluid and fluid–solid molecular interactions induce non-negligible nanoscale effects, resulting in complicated and poorly understood non-Darcy flow behaviours, thereby rendering many existing conventional pore-scale simulation methods inadequate. In this work, a nanoscale pseudopotential lattice Boltzmann model incorporating molecular interactions that give rise to wall slip, interfacial slip and heterogeneous viscosity, is developed to investigate the underlying mechanisms of molecular interactions governing multiphase flow in nanoporous media. The theoretical solutions of single-phase and two-phase flow in nanopores are first analysed based on the Hagen–Poiseuille equation, and the lattice Boltzmann model is then validated for accuracy and used to obtain microscopic parameters through molecular simulations and theoretical analysis. The proposed model is then applied to simulate the displacement of the non-wetting phase by the wetting phase, systematically examining both the individual and coupled effects of molecular interactions, initial wetting-phase saturation, wettability and capillary number on displacement behaviour, patterns, efficiency and phase trapping in nanoporous media. A universal scaling relationship is identified between the flow enhancement factor and displacement efficiency, with nanoscale effects transitioning from flow enhancement to suppression as displacement efficiency increases. These simulations and findings elucidate how fluid–fluid and fluid–solid molecular interactions govern multiphase transport in nanoporous media.
Information
- Type
- JFM Papers
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Bao, J., Du, J., Zhan, S., Wang, L. & Luo, Y. 2025 A molecular perspective on the microscopic mechanisms of CO2 injection and water films in fluid transport and enhanced oil recovery. Adv. Geo-Energy Res. 16 (3), 288–292.10.46690/ager.2025.06.08CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baptista-Pires, L., Pérez-López, B., Mayorga-Martinez, C.C., Morales-Narváez, E., Domingo, N., Esplandiu, M.J., Alzina, F., Sotomayor-Torres, C.M. & Merkoçi, A. 2014 Electrocatalytic tuning of biosensing response through electrostatic or hydrophobic enzyme–graphene oxide interactions. Biosens. Bioelectr. 61, 655–662.10.1016/j.bios.2014.05.028CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berk, T. & Coletti, F. 2024 An analytical model for the slip velocity of particles in turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 996, A1.10.1017/jfm.2024.620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cai, J., Jiao, X., Wang, H., He, W. & Xia, Y. 2024 Multiphase fluid-rock interactions and flow behaviors in shale nanopores: a comprehensive review. Earth-Sci. Rev. 257, 104884.10.1016/j.earscirev.2024.104884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, L., Kang, Q., Mu, Y., He, Y. & Tao, W. 2014 A critical review of the pseudopotential multiphase lattice Boltzmann model: Methods and applications. Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer 76, 210–236.10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2014.04.032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiavazzo, E., Fasano, M., Asinari, P. & Decuzzi, P. 2014 Scaling behaviour for the water transport in nanoconfined geometries. Nat. Commun. 5, 3565.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cui, J. 2019 Pre-Darcy flow in shales: effects of the rate-dependent slip. J. Petrol. Sci. Engng 183, 106393.10.1016/j.petrol.2019.106393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feng, D., Li, X., Wang, X., Li, J., Zhang, T., Sun, Z., He, M., Liu, Q., Qin, J. & Han, S. 2018 Capillary filling of confined water in nanopores: coupling the increased viscosity and slippage. Chem. Engng Sci. 186, 228–239.10.1016/j.ces.2018.04.055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galliero, G. 2010 Lennard-Jones fluid-fluid interfaces under shear. Phys. Rev. E 81 (5), 056306.10.1103/PhysRevE.81.056306CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gao, Y., Li, M., Zhang, Y., Lu, W. & Xu, B. 2020 Spontaneous outflow efficiency of confined liquid in hydrophobic nanopores. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 117 (41), 25246–25253.10.1073/pnas.2009310117CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guo, Z., Zhao, T. & Shi, Y. 2005 Temperature dependence of the velocity boundary condition for nanoscale fluid flows. Phys. Rev. E 72 (3), 036301.10.1103/PhysRevE.72.036301CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guo, Z., Zheng, C. & Shi, B. 2002 Discrete lattice effects on the forcing term in the lattice Boltzmann method. Phys. Rev. E 65 (4), 046308.10.1103/PhysRevE.65.046308CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hilaire, L., Siboulet, B., Charton, S. & Dufrêche, J.F. 2023 Liquid–liquid flow at nanoscale: slip and hydrodynamic boundary conditions. Langmuir 39 (6), 2260–2273.10.1021/acs.langmuir.2c02856CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holt, J.K., Park, H.G., Wang, Y., Stadermann, M., Artyukhin, A.B., Grigoropoulos, C.P., Noy, A. & Bakajin, O. 2006 Fast mass transport through sub-2-nanometer carbon nanotubes. Science 312 (5776), 1034–1037.10.1126/science.1126298CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hu, K., Liu, Y., Zhang, Q., Song, Z., Thaika, M.A., Li, R., Kuru, E., Shi, J. & Liu, H. 2024 From micropores to macropores: investigating pore characteristics of Longmaxi Shale in the Sichuan Basin. Energy Fuel 38 (5), 3961–3981.10.1021/acs.energyfuels.3c04516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, D.M., Sendner, C., Horinek, D., Netz, R.R. & Bocquet, L. 2008 Water slippage versus contact angle: a quasiuniversal relationship. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 (22), 226101.10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.226101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kannam, S.K., Daivis, P.J. & Todd, B. 2017 Modeling slip and flow enhancement of water in carbon nanotubes. MRS Bull. 42 (4), 283–288.10.1557/mrs.2017.61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kannam, S.K., Todd, B.D., Hansen, J.S. & Daivis, P.J. 2013 How fast does water flow in carbon nanotubes? J. Chem. Phys. 138 (9), 094701.10.1063/1.4793396CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lallemand, P. & Luo, L.S. 2000 Theory of the lattice Boltzmann method: dispersion, dissipation, isotropy, Galilean invariance, and stability. Phys. Rev. E 61 (6), 6546.10.1103/PhysRevE.61.6546CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lasseux, D. & Valdés-Parada, F.J. 2024 Darcy’s law survival from no-slip to perfect-slip flow in porous media. J. Fluid Mech. 997, A65.10.1017/jfm.2024.587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lasseux, D., Valdés-Parada, F.J. & Bottaro, A. 2021 Upscaled model for unsteady slip flow in porous media. J. Fluid Mech. 923, A37.10.1017/jfm.2021.606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lei, W., Gong, W., Lu, X. & Wang, M. 2024 Fluid entrapment during forced imbibition in a multidepth microfluidic chip with complex porous geometry. J. Fluid Mech. 987, A3.10.1017/jfm.2024.358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lei, W., Gong, W., Lu, X., Yang, Y., Yang, H. & Wang, M. 2025 3-D-geometry-triggered transition from monotonic to non-monotonic effects of wettability on multiphase displacements in homogeneous porous media. J. Fluid Mech.
1014, R2.10.1017/jfm.2025.10196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Z., Li, J., Yan, G., Galindo-Torres, S., Scheuermann, A. & Li, L. 2021 Mesoscopic model framework for liquid slip in a confined parallel-plate flow channel. Phys. Rev. Fluids 6 (3), 034203.10.1103/PhysRevFluids.6.034203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, J., Yang, Y., Sun, S., Yao, J. & Kou, J. 2022 Flow behaviors of shale oil in kerogen slit by molecular dynamics simulation. Chem. Engng J. 434, 134682.10.1016/j.cej.2022.134682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowe, A., Tsyrin, N., ChorĄżewski, M., Zajdel, P., Mierzwa, M., Leão, J.B., Bleuel, M., Feng, T., Luo, D. & Li, M. 2019 Effect of flexibility and nanotriboelectrification on the dynamic reversibility of water intrusion into nanopores: pressure-transmitting fluid with frequency-dependent dissipation capability. ACS Appl. Mater. Interface 11 (43), 40842–40849.10.1021/acsami.9b14031CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ma, M., Grey, F., Shen, L., Urbakh, M., Wu, S., Liu, J.Z., Liu, Y. & Zheng, Q. 2015 Water transport inside carbon nanotubes mediated by phonon-induced oscillating friction. Nat. Nanotechnology 10 (8), 692–695.10.1038/nnano.2015.134CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Majumder, M., Chopra, N., Andrews, R. & Hinds, B.J. 2005 Nanoscale hydrodynamics: enhanced flow in carbon nanotubes. Nature 438 (7064), 44.10.1038/438044aCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martys, N.S. & Chen, H. 1996 Simulation of multicomponent fluids in complex three-dimensional geometries by the lattice Boltzmann method. Phys. Rev. E 53 (1), 743.10.1103/PhysRevE.53.743CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mattia, D. & Calabrò, F. 2012 Explaining high flow rate of water in carbon nanotubes via solid–liquid molecular interactions. Microfluid Nanofluid 13 (1), 125–130.10.1007/s10404-012-0949-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattia, D., Leese, H. & Lee, K.P. 2015 Carbon nanotube membranes: from flow enhancement to permeability. J. Membr. Sci. 475, 266–272.10.1016/j.memsci.2014.10.035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehrabi, M., Javadpour, F. & Sepehrnoori, K. 2017 Analytical analysis of gas diffusion into non-circular pores of shale organic matter. J. Fluid Mech. 819, 656–677.10.1017/jfm.2017.180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minakov, A.V., Pryazhnikov, M.I., Neverov, A.L., Sukhodaev, P.O. & Zhigarev, V.A. 2024 Wettability, interfacial tension, and capillary imbibition of nanomaterial-modified cross-linked gels for hydraulic fracturing. Capillarity 12 (2), 27–40.10.46690/capi.2024.08.01CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morciano, M., Fasano, M., Nold, A., Braga, C., Yatsyshin, P., Sibley, D.N., Goddard, B.D., Chiavazzo, E., Asinari, P. & Kalliadasis, S. 2017 Nonequilibrium molecular dynamics simulations of nanoconfined fluids at solid-liquid interfaces. J. Chem. Phys. 146 (24), 244507.10.1063/1.4986904CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Navier, C. 1823 Mémoire sur les lois du mouvement des fluides. Mémoires de l’Académie Royale des Sciences de l’Institut de France 6 (1823), 389–440.Google Scholar
Neek-Amal, M., Peeters, F.M., Grigorieva, I.V. & Geim, A.K. 2016 Commensurability effects in viscosity of nanoconfined water. ACS Nano 10 (3), 3685–3692.10.1021/acsnano.6b00187CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pasquier, S., Quintard, M. & Davit, Y. 2017 Modeling flow in porous media with rough surfaces: effective slip boundary conditions and application to structured packings. Chem. Engng Sci. 165, 131–146.10.1016/j.ces.2017.01.063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petravic, J. & Harrowell, P. 2009 Spatial dependence of viscosity and thermal conductivity through a planar interface. J. Phys. Chem. B 113 (7), 2059–2065.10.1021/jp807254bCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Qin, X., Wang, H., Xia, Y., Ling, B., Wang, G. & Cai, J. 2024
a Micro-and nanoscale flow mechanisms in porous rocks based on pore-scale modeling. Capillarity 13 (1), 24–28.10.46690/capi.2024.10.03CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qin, X., Wu, J., Xia, Y., Wang, H. & Cai, J. 2024
b Multicomponent image-based modeling of water flow in heterogeneous wet shale nanopores. Energy 298, 131367.10.1016/j.energy.2024.131367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qin, Z. & Buehler, M.J. 2015 Nonlinear viscous water at nanoporous two-dimensional interfaces resists high-speed flow through cooperativity. Nano Lett. 15 (6), 3939–3944.10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b00809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanhai, W.R., Sakamoto, J.H., Canady, R. & Ferrari, M. 2008 Seven challenges for nanomedicine. Nat. Nanotechnology 3 (5), 242–244.10.1038/nnano.2008.114CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Secchi, E., Marbach, S., Nigues, A., Stein, D., Siria, A. & Bocquet, L. 2016 Massive radius-dependent flow slippage in carbon nanotubes. Nature 537 (7619), 210–213.10.1038/nature19315CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shan, B., Wang, P., Wang, R., Zhang, Y. & Guo, Z. 2022 Molecular kinetic modelling of nanoscale slip flow using a continuum approach. J. Fluid Mech. 939, A9.10.1017/jfm.2022.186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shan, X. & Chen, H. 1993 Lattice Boltzmann model for simulating flows with multiple phases and components. Phys. Rev. E 47 (3), 1815.10.1103/PhysRevE.47.1815CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smirnov, S., Vlassiouk, I., Takmakov, P. & Rios, F. 2010 Water confinement in hydrophobic nanopores. Pressure-induced wetting and drying. ACS Nano 4 (9), 5069–5075.10.1021/nn101080kCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sparreboom, W., van den Berg, A. & Eijkel, J.C. 2009 Principles and applications of nanofluidic transport. Natn. Nanotechnology 4 (11), 713–720.10.1038/nnano.2009.332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Telari, E., Tinti, A. & Giacomello, A. 2022 Intrinsic and apparent slip at gas-enriched liquid–liquid interfaces: a molecular dynamics study. J. Fluid Mech. 938, A35.10.1017/jfm.2022.162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, J.A. & McGaughey, A.J. 2008 Reassessing fast water transport through carbon nanotubes. Nano Lett. 8 (9), 2788–2793.10.1021/nl8013617CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tocci, G., Joly, L. & Michaelides, A. 2014 Friction of water on graphene and hexagonal boron nitride from ab initio methods: very different slippage despite very similar interface structures. Nano Lett. 14 (12), 6872–6877.10.1021/nl502837dCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vaganov, R.A., Zhigarev, V.A., Pryazhnikov, M.I., Shebeleva, A.A., Nemtsev, I.V. & Minakov, A.V. 2025 Improving the efficiency of surfactant and polymer solutions by modifying them with nanoparticle additives to increase oil recovery. Chem. Engng Sci. 321, 122732.10.1016/j.ces.2025.122732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, H., Kang, Q., Wang, W., He, W., Xia, Y. & Cai, J. 2025
a Oil-CO2 phase behavior in nanoporous media: a lattice Boltzmann study. Intl Commun. Heat Mass Transfer 163, 108738.10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2025.108738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, H., Su, Y., Wang, W., Li, L., Sheng, G. & Zhan, S. 2019
a Relative permeability model of oil-water flow in nanoporous media considering multi-mechanisms. J. Petrol. Sci. Engng 183, 106361.10.1016/j.petrol.2019.106361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, H., Su, Y., Wang, W., Sheng, G., Li, H. & Zafar, A. 2019
b Enhanced water flow and apparent viscosity model considering wettability and shape effects. Fuel 253, 1351–1360.10.1016/j.fuel.2019.05.098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, H., Wang, W., Su, Y. & Jin, Z. 2022 Lattice boltzmann model for oil/water two-phase flow in nanoporous media considering heterogeneous viscosity, liquid/solid, and liquid/liquid slip. SPE J. 27 (06), 3508–3524.10.2118/210564-PACrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, H., Xia, X., Zhao, F., Wang, W. & Cai, J. 2025
b Pore-scale study on CO2 miscible displacement of shale oil considering competitive adsorption. Langmuir 41, 32637–32649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, H., Zhang, M., Xia, X., Tian, Z., Qin, X. & Cai, J. 2024
a Lattice Boltzmann prediction of CO2 and CH4 competitive adsorption in shale porous media accelerated by machine learning for CO2 sequestration and enhanced CH4 recovery. Appl. Energy 370, 123638.10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, S., Javadpour, F. & Feng, Q. 2016 Fast mass transport of oil and supercritical carbon dioxide through organic nanopores in shale. Fuel 181, 741–758.10.1016/j.fuel.2016.05.057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Z., Zhang, T., Liu, S., Ding, K., Liu, T., Yao, J., Sun, H., Yang, Y., Zhang, L. & Wang, W. 2024
b Unveiling nanoscale fluid miscible behaviors with nanofluidic slim-tube. Energy Environ. Sci. 17 (24), 9635–9651.10.1039/D4EE02292KCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, K., Chen, Z., Li, J., Lei, Z., Xu, J., Wang, K., Li, R., Dong, X., Peng, Y. & Yang, S. 2019
a Nanoconfinement effect on n-alkane flow. J. Phys. Chem. C 123 (26), 16456–16461.10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b03903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, K., Chen, Z., Li, J., Li, X., Xu, J. & Dong, X. 2017 Wettability effect on nanoconfined water flow. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 114 (13), 3358–3363.10.1073/pnas.1612608114CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, K., Chen, Z., Li, J., Xu, J., Wang, K., Li, R., Wang, S. & Dong, X. 2019
b Ultrahigh water flow enhancement by optimizing nanopore chemistry and geometry. Langmuir 35 (26), 8867–8873.10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b01179CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xu, J., Zhan, S., Wang, W., Su, Y. & Wang, H. 2022 Molecular dynamics simulations of two-phase flow of n-alkanes with water in quartz nanopores. Chem. Engng J. 430, 132800.10.1016/j.cej.2021.132800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, P., Yang, F., Kang, N., Nie, S. & Fu, J. 2026 Wetting behavior of shale: the effects of temperature, salinity, and oil–water two-phase interactions. Fuel 405, 136760.10.1016/j.fuel.2025.136760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yiotis, A.G., Psihogios, J., Kainourgiakis, M.E., Papaioannou, A. & Stubos, A.K. 2007 A lattice boltzmann study of viscous coupling effects in immiscible two-phase flow in porous media. Colloids Surf. A Physicochim Engng Aspects 300 (1–2), 35–49.10.1016/j.colsurfa.2006.12.045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhan, S., Bao, J., Wang, X., Wang, W., Su, Y., Zhang, M., Wang, Y. & Jin, Z. 2024 A comparative study of shale oil transport behavior in graphene and kerogen nanopores with various roughness via molecular dynamics simulations. Chem. Engng J. 498, 155173.10.1016/j.cej.2024.155173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhan, S., Su, Y., Jin, Z., Zhang, M., Wang, W., Hao, Y. & Li, L. 2020 Study of liquid-liquid two-phase flow in hydrophilic nanochannels by molecular simulations and theoretical modeling. Chem. Engng J. 395, 125053.10.1016/j.cej.2020.125053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, T., Javadpour, F., Yin, Y. & Li, X. 2020 Upscaling water flow in composite nanoporous shale matrix using lattice boltzmann method. Water Resour. Res. 56 (4), e2019WR026007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, T., Li, X., Sun, Z., Feng, D., Miao, Y., Li, P. & Zhang, Z. 2017 An analytical model for relative permeability in water-wet nanoporous media. Chem. Engng Sci. 174, 1–12.10.1016/j.ces.2017.08.023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, J., Kang, Q., Yao, J., Zhang, L., Li, Z., Yang, Y. & Sun, H. 2018 Lattice Boltzmann simulation of liquid flow in nanoporous media. Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer 125, 1131–1143.10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.04.123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zheng, J., Qi, X., Gong, W., Bian, Y. & Ju, Y. 2024 Investigating snap-off behavior during spontaneous imbibition in 3D pore-throat model by pseudopotential lattice Boltzmann method. Adv. Water Resour. 190, 104751.10.1016/j.advwatres.2024.104751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, R., Neek-Amal, M., Peeters, F.M., Bai, B. & Sun, C. 2024 Interlink between abnormal water imbibition in hydrophilic and rapid flow in hydrophobic nanochannels. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 (18), 184001.10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.184001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhu, H., Lu, Y., Pan, Y., Qiao, P., Raza, A. & Liu, W. 2024 Nanoscale mineralogy and organic structure characterization of shales: insights via afm-ir spectroscopy. Adv. Geo-Energy Res. 13 (3), 231–236.10.46690/ager.2024.09.08CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang et al. supplementary movie 1
4.1-molecular interaction effects-considering all.
File
9.8 MB
Wang et al. supplementary movie 2
4.1-molecular interaction effects-without considering all.
File
10.6 MB
Wang et al. supplementary movie 3
4.2-saturation effects-0.1.
File
12.2 MB
Wang et al. supplementary movie 4
4.2-saturation effects-0.2.
File
15.6 MB
Wang et al. supplementary movie 5
4.2-saturation effects-0.3.
File
15.5 MB
Wang et al. supplementary movie 6
4.2-saturation effects-0.
File
9.8 MB
Wang et al. supplementary movie 7
4.3-wettability effects-36°.
File
23.7 MB
Wang et al. supplementary movie 8
4.3-wettability effects-47°.
File
12.2 MB
Wang et al. supplementary movie 9
4.3-wettability effects-57°.
File
20.4 MB
Wang et al. supplementary movie 10
4.3-wettability effects-80°.
File
20.9 MB
Wang et al. supplementary movie 11
4.4-Capillary number-2.4×10-4.
File
10.3 MB
Wang et al. supplementary movie 12
4.4-Capillary number-4.2×10-5.
File
43 MB