Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-rxvq6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-24T00:46:49.557Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Two-dimensional turbulence above topography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 April 2006

Francis P. Bretherton  and
Dale B. Haidvogel
Francis P. Bretherton
Affiliation:
National Center for Atmospheric Research, P.O. Box 3000, Boulder, Colorado 80303
Dale B. Haidvogel
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge Present address: Center for Earth and Planetary Physics, Pierce Hall, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In a turbulent two-dimensional flow enstrophy systematically cascades to very small scales, at which it is dissipated. The kinetic energy, on the other hand, remains at large scales and the total kinetic energy is constant. Above random topography an initially turbulent flow tends to a steady state with streamlines parallel to contours of constant depth, anticyclonic around a bump. A numerical experiment verifies this prediction. In a closed basin on a beta-plane the solution with minimum enstrophy implies a westward flow in the interior, returning in narrow boundary layers to the north and south. This result is interpreted using a parameterization of the effects of the eddies on the large-scale flow. The numerical solution is in qualitative agreement, but corresponds to a minimum of a more complex measure of the total enstrophy than the usual quadratic integral.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 78 , Issue 1 , 5 November 1976 , pp. 129 - 154
Copyright
© 1976 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Arakawa, A. 1966 Computational design for long-term numerical integration of the equations of fluid motion: two-dimensional incompressible flow. Part I. J. Comp. Phys. 1, 119–143.Google Scholar
Arnold, V. I. 1965 Conditions for nonlinear stability of stationary plane curvilinear flows of an ideal fluid. Proc. (Dokl.) Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R. 162, 773–777.Google Scholar
Batchelor, G. K. 1969 Computation of the energy spectrum in homogeneous two-dimensional turbulence. Phys. Fluids. Suppl. 12, II 233–239.Google Scholar
Bell, T. H. 1975 Statistical features of sea-floor topography. Deep-Sea Res. 22, 883–892.Google Scholar
Bretherton, F. P. & Karweit, M. 1975 Mid-ocean mesoscale modelling. In Numerical Models of Ocean Circulation, pp. 237–249. Nat. Acad. Sci.
Fofonoff, N. P. 1954 Steady flow in a frictionless homogeneous ocean. J. Mar. Res. 13, 254–262.Google Scholar
Herring, J. R., Orszag, S. A., Kraichnan, R. H. & Fox, D. G. 1974 Decay of two-dimensional homogeneous turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 66, 417–444.Google Scholar
Holloway, G. & Hendershott, M. 1974 The effect of bottom relief on barotropic eddy fields. MODE Hot Line News, no. 65.Google Scholar
Lorenz, E. N. 1971 An N-cycle time-differencing scheme for stepwise numerical integration. Mon. Wea. Rev. 99, 644–648.Google Scholar
Orszag, S. A. 1971 Numerical simulation of incompressible flows within simple boundaries: accuracy. J. Fluid Mech. 49, 75–112.Google Scholar
Rhines, P. B. 1975 Waves and turbulence on a beta-plane. J. Fluid Mech. 69, 417–443.Google Scholar
Taylor, G. I. 1921 Diffusion by continuous movements, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 20, 196–212.Google Scholar