Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-hqrjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-15T15:16:45.249Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prepositional complementizers in Welsh1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Robert D. Borsley
Robert D. Borsley
Affiliation:
IBM UK Scientific Centre, Winchester
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A number of languages have what can be called prepositional complementizers, items which look like prepositions and have some of the properties of prepositions but appear in positions in which complementizers appear. In this paper I shall be concerned with Welsh prepositional complementizers and, in particular, with their implications for the analysis of subjectless infinitives. I shall consider the possibility of providing an analysis of the Welsh facts within the government-binding (GB) framework of Chomsky (1981, 1982, 1984), in which subjectless infinitives are clauses. I will argue that GB assumptions preclude a satisfactory account of the data. I will also show that certain facts relating to agreement pose further problems for a GB approach. I will then show that the facts are quite straightforward if one assumes that subjectless infinitives are bare VPs, as argued for Welsh in Borsley (1984a), and that VPs and Ss are members of the same basic category, as proposed in Borsley (1983, 1984b). It looks, then, as if we have some interesting evidence here for these assumptions.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , March 1986 , pp. 67 - 84
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Battye, A. (1984). Infinitival particles in French and Italian. Unpublished paper, University of York.Google Scholar
Borsley, R. D. (1983). A Welsh agreement process and the status of VP and S. In Gazdar, G., Klein, E. & Pullum, G. K. (eds), Order, concord and constituency. Dordrecht: Foris. 57–74.Google Scholar
Borsley, R. D. (1984a). VP complements: evidence from Welsh. JL 20. 277–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borsley, R. D. (1984b). On the nonexistence of VPs. In Geest, W. de & Putseys, Y. (eds), Sentential complementation. Dordrecht: Foris. 55–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouchard, D. (1983). On the content of empty categories. Dordrecht: ForisCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. A. (1980). On binding. LIn 11. 1–46.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. A. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. A. (1982). Some concepts and consequences of the theory of government and binding. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. A. (1984). Knowledge of language: its nature, origins and use. Unpublished MS. MIT.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. A. & Lasnik, H. (1977). Filters and control. LIn 8. 425–504.Google Scholar
Davis, A. (1984). Behind the for-to filter: for-to infinitives in Belfast English and the theory of government. Sheffield Working Papers in Linguistics 1. 56–71.Google Scholar
Gazdar, G., Klein, E., Pullum, G. K. & Sag, I. A. (1985). Generalized phrase structure grammar. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Harlow, S. (1981). Government and relativization in Celtic. In Heny, F. (ed.), Binding and filtering. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Harlow, S. (1983). Celtic relatives. York Papers in Linguistics 10. 77–121.Google Scholar
Hornstein, N. & Weinberg, A. (1981). Case theory and preposition stranding. LIn 12. 213–254.Google Scholar
Jones, M. & Thomas, A. R. (1977). The Welsh language: studies in its syntax and semantics. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar
Kayne, R. S. (1981). On certain differences between French and English. LIn 12. 349–372.Google Scholar
Koster, J. (1984). On binding and control. LIn 15. 417–459.Google Scholar
Koster, J. & May, R. (1982). On the constituency of infinitives. Lg 58. 116–143.Google Scholar
Pullum, G. K. (1981). Syncategorematicity and English infinitival to. Glossa 16. 181–215.Google Scholar
Taraldsen, K. T. (1984). The internal structure and the external distribution of tensed clausal complements in English, French and Norwegian. In Geest, W. de & Putseys, Y. (eds), Sentential complementation. Dordrecht: Foris. 239–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar