Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-ggg9q Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-31T16:57:46.779Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The identity of Gastrochaena cuneiformis Spengler, 1783, and the evolution of Gastrochaena, Rocellaria, and Lamychaena (Mollusca, Bivalvia, Gastrochaenoidea)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Joseph G. Carter ,
Trent McDowell  and
Naveen Namboodiri
Joseph G. Carter
Affiliation:
1Department of Geological Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-3315,
Trent McDowell
Affiliation:
1Department of Geological Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-3315,
Naveen Namboodiri
Affiliation:
2Department of Geological Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-3315,
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The specimens of Gastrochaena cuneiformis Spengler, 1783, with Spengler-written labels at the Zoologisk Museum, Copenhagen, did not come from Spengler's type locality in the Nicobar Islands, and may instead be syntypes of Chemnitz's (1788) West Indies “Pholas hians”. the identity of Gastrochaena cuneiformis as a senior synonym of Gastrochaena gigantea (Deshayes, 1830) is established on the basis of Spengler's original descriptions and illustrations, and by examination of specimens from the type locality. A neotype for G. cuneiformis is designated and illustrated, and its genus is revised to exclude Rocellaria Blainville, 1829, and Lamychaena Freneix in Freneix and Roman, 1979. Gastrochaena Spengler, 1783 is the most plesiomorphic of these three genera, as shown by its simple boring, short siphons, and diffuse, poorly differentiated anterior pedal muscles. Rocellaria evolved from a close common ancestor with Gastrochaena, and is characterized by a ventral shift and fusion of the posteroventral pallial sinus with the posteroventral pallial band, low, irregular posterior commarginal lamellae, and well defined anterior pedal retractor muscles generally supported by myophores. Lamychaena evolved from Rocellaria during the Oligocene, extending its ctenidia far posterior into the siphonal part of the boring, and, in some species, uniting its anterior pedal retractor and protractor muscles as they approach the byssus apparatus.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 82 , Issue 1 , January 2008 , pp. 102 - 117
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aldrich, T. H. 1903. Two new species of Eocene fossils from the Lignitic of Alabama. The Nautilus, 17(2): 19–20.Google Scholar
Blainville, H. M. D. de. 1825, 1827. Manuel de Malacologie et de Conchyliologie. Vol. 1, p. i–viii+ 647, 2 unpaged tables, 1825; Vol. 2, p. 649-664, + 4 pls. + 87 pls. + 18 pls., 1827.Google Scholar
Blainville, H. M. D. de. Tome 57,“1828” [1829]. In de Blainville, H. M. D., 1820, 1821, 1824, 1829. In Cuvier, F., among many others, 1816-1830, Dictionnaire des Sciences Naturelles dans lequel on Traite Méthodiquement des Différens Êtres de la Natur, Considérés soit en Eux-mêmes, d'après l'état Actuel de nos Connoissances, soit Relativement a l'Utilité qu'en Peuvent Retirer la Médecine, l'Agriculture, le Commerce et les Arts. Suivi d'une Biographie des Plus Célèbres Naturalistes. F. G. Levrault, Strasbourg and Paris.Google Scholar
Bouchet, P. and Dandrigal, F. 1982. Napoleon's Egyptian campaign (1798-1801) and the Savigny collection of shells. The Nautilus, 96(1):9–24.Google Scholar
Briggs, J. C. 1995. Global Biogeography. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 452 p.Google Scholar
Carter, J. G. 1978. Ecology and evolution of the Gastrochaenacea (Mollusca, Bivalvia), with notes on the evolution of the endolithic habitat. Yale University Peabody Museum Bulletin, 41:1–92.Google Scholar
Chavan, A. 1952. Les Pélécypodes des Sables Astartiens de Cordebugle (Calvados). Mémoires Suisses de Paléontologie, 69:1–132, 4 pls.Google Scholar
Chemnitz, J. H. 1788. Vol. 10, 376p., pls. 137-173. In Martini, F. H. W., Chemnitz, J. H., Happe, A. F., von Schubert, G. H., Wagner, J. A., and Schröter, J. S., 1769-1829, Neues Systematisches Conchylien-Cabinet fortgesetzt durch Johann Hieronymus Chemnitz, Pastor bey der Copenhagener Deutschen Garnisionsgemeinde, ordentliches Mitglied bey der Kayserlichen Leopoldinischen Akademie der Naturforscher, der Königlich Dänischen Societät der Wissenschaften zu Copenhagen, der Nordischen Societät der Wissenschaften zu Drontheim, der gelehrten Gesellschaft zu Danzig, unde der Gesellschaft naturforschender Freunde zu Berlin. 12 Vols., 431 pls. (1-193, 1-144, 144A, 145-194, 195A, 195B, 196-235, 236/237). Gabriel Nikolaus Raspe [publisher's name varies], Nürnberg.Google Scholar
Children, J. G. 1822. In Children, J. G., 1822-1824, Art. VI.—Lamarck's genera of shells translated from French. With plates from original drawings, by Miss A. Children. Quarterly Journal of Science, Literature and Arts, 14(27):64–86, pls. 3-4, 1822; 14(28): 298-322, pls. 5-6, 1823; 15(29):23-52, pls. 2-3, 1823; 15(30):216-258, pls. 7-8, 1823; 16(31):49-79, pl. 5, 1823; 16(32):241-264, pl. 6, 1824.Google Scholar
Costa, O. G. 1844. Catalogo de' Testacei viventi nel piccolo e grande mare di Taranto, redatto sul sistema di Lamarck. Atti della Reale Accademia delle Scienze, Sezione della Società Reale Borbonica [Napoli], 5(2): 13–66, 4 pls.Google Scholar
Delle Chiaje, S. 1822-1829. Memorie Sulla Storia e Notomia degli Animali Senza Vertebre del Regno di Napoli. 4 Vols. plus atlas of 114 pls. Dalla Stamperia della Sociéta Tipographica, Napoli, 1822. Vol. 1, “1823”, [i-iv] + vii-xii, p.1–184. Vol. 2, “1825”, [i-v] + p. [1]-“(2)”, “(3)”, “(4)”, + p. 185-444.Google Scholar
Delle Chiaje, S. 1841. Descrizioni e Notomia degli Animali Invertebrati della Sicilia Citeriore: Osservati Vivi negli Anni 1822-1830. Added title page: Animali senza Vertebre del Regno di Napoli. 8 Vols., including 173 pls. Batelli, C., Napoli. Vol. 1, Molluschi cefalopedi e pteropedi, p. [i-v]-vi-xix, p. [1] + 2-98. Vol. 2, Molluschi gasteropedi, p. [1-4] + 5-146. Vol. 3, Molluschi acefali, bracciopedi, cirropedi, crostacei, annelosi, p. [1-4] + 5-142. Vol. 4, Echinodermi, acalefi, polipi, p. [1] + 2-142. Vol. 5, Polipi, amorfi, descrizioni techniche, p. [1-5] + 6-165. Vols. 6-7, Figure. Vol. 8, Appendici, osservazioni critiche, indice generale, p. [1-5] + 6-48.Google Scholar
Deshayes, G.-P. 1824. In Deshayes, G.-P., 1824-1837. Description des Coquilles Fossiles des Environs de Paris, Tome 1, Conchifères, Paris, published by the author, and others. Fasc. 1, 1824, p. 1–80; Fasc. 2, 1825, p. 81-170; Fasc. 3, 1829, p. 171-238; Fasc. 4, 1830, p. 239-322; Fasc. 5, 1832, p. 323-392. Atlas, Paris, F.-G. Levrault, published 1837.Google Scholar
Deshayes, G.-P. 1830. In Deshayes, G.-P., 1830-1832. Encyclopédie Méthodique. Histoire Naturelle des Vers. Tome 2, Pt. 1, p. i–vii, p. 1-256, Paris [1830]; tome 2, Pt. 2, p. 1-144, Paris [1830]; tome 2, Pt. 2, p. 145-594, Paris [1832]; tome 3, p. 595-1152, Paris [1832]. [The title page lists as authors J. G. Bruguière, [J. B.] de Lamarck, and G. P. Deshayes, but Bruguière and Lamarck had no part in the authorship.]Google Scholar
Deshayes, G.-P. 1845-1848 (atlas) and 1846a (text). Histoire naturelle des Mollusques. Tome Premier, Mollusques Acéphalés, Text + Atlas. In Exploration Scientifique de l'Algérie pendant les Années 1840, 1841, 1842, Sciences Physiques, Zoologie, Vol. 1, 609 p., Paris, Imprimerie Nationale, 1844-1848; and Atlas, [1845-1848], 160 p. + “143” + A-E pls. [including some plates with both letter and number, e.g., IV; some of the plates were never published; publication suspended by the revolution of 1848.] [text p. 1-82 published 1846; p. 83-152 published between 1846 and 1848; p. 153-609 published 1848.]Google Scholar
Deshayes, G.-P. 1846b. Examen anatomique du Gastrochène de la Méditerranée (Gastrochaena dubia). Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires des Séances de l'Académie des Sciences (Paris), 22(1):37–38.Google Scholar
Deshayes, G.-P. 1846c. Anatomische Untersuchung der im Mittelmeere lebenden Gastrochaena (G. dubia). Froriep's Notizen aus dem Gebiete des Natur- und Heilkunde [Jena], Volume 37, columns 101-103.Google Scholar
Deshayes, G.-P. 1846d. [Proceedings of meeting of the Académie Royale des Sciences de Paris, January 5, 1846.] Revue Zoologique, par la Société Cuvierienne, 1846 [Vol. 9], p. 28–29.Google Scholar
Deshayes, G.-P. 1855 [“1854”]. Descriptions of new shells from the collection of Hugh Cuming, Esq. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, Pt. 22, for 1854, p. 317–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dollfus, G. F. and Dautzenberg, P. 1888. Descriptions des coquilles nouvelles des faluns de la Touraine. Journal de Conchyliologie, Paris, 36 [ser. 3, Volume 28]:243–269.Google Scholar
Doursther, H. 1840. Dictionnaire Universel des Poids et Mesures Ancienes et Modernes, contenant des Tables des Monnais de Tous les Pays. 604 p. [Reprinted by Meridian Publ. Co., Amsterdam, 1965].Google Scholar
Dufo, H. 1840. Observations sur les Mollusques marins, terrestres et fluviatiles des îles Séchelles et des Amirantes. II. Annales des Sciences Naturelles, Paris, Zoologie, ser. 2, 14:166–221.Google Scholar
Dunker, W. B. R. H. and Pfeiffer, L. G. K. 1882. Index Molluscorum Maris Japonici, Conscriptus et Tabulis Iconum XVI Illustratus a Guilielmo Dunker. Cassellis Cattorum [Kassel], sumptibus Theodori Fischer. (Novitates Conchologicae, Supplement 7), 301 p., 16 pls., Kassel. (In Latin)Google Scholar
Duval, D. M. 1963. The comparative anatomy of some lamellibranch siphons. Proceedings of the Malacological Society of London, 35:289–295.Google Scholar
Eames, F. E. 1951. A contribution to the study of the Eocene in Western Pakistan and Western India. B. The description of the Lamellibranchia from standard sections in the Rakhi Nala and Zinda Pir Areas of the Western Punjab and in the Kohat District. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, ser. B, 235:311–482.Google Scholar
Forbes, E. and Hanley, S. C. T., 1848. In Forbes, E., Hanley, S. C. T., and Jay, J. C., 1848-1853, A History of British Mollusca, and Their Shells, Volume 1, “1853”, Including the Tunicata, and the families of Lamellibranchiata as far as Cyprinidae, 486 p., 64 plates; Vol. 2, “1853”, Including the remaining families of bivalves, the Pteropoda, and the Gasteropoda [sic] as far as Ianthinidae, 557 p.; Vol. 3, “1853”, Including the families Gasteropoda from Neritidae to Elysiadae, 616 p.; Vol. 4, “1853”, Pulmonifera and Cephalopoda, 301 p., 133 pls. John van Voorst, London. [Text published 1853; pls. A-O and I-XXXIV published 1848.]Google Scholar
Freneix, S. and Roman, J. 1979. Gastrochaenidae endobiotes d'Échinides Cénozoiques (Clypeaster et autres). Nouvelle classification de ces bivalves. Bulletin Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, ser. 4, 1, sect. C, no. 4:287–313.Google Scholar
Fürsich, F. T., Palmer, T. J., and Goodyear, K. L. 1994. Growth and disintegration of bivalve-dominated patch reefs in the Upper Jurassic of southern England. Palaeontology, 37(1): 131–171.Google Scholar
Gmelin, J. F. 1791. Tome I, Pars VI (Vermes), 2 + p. 3021–3910. In Linnaeus, C. A. and Gmelin, J. F., 1788-1793 (deuxième impression 1789-1796), Caroli A Linné, Systema Naturae per Regna Tria Naturae, Secundum Classes, Ordines, Genera, Species, cum Characteribus, Differentiis, Synonymis, Locis. Editio Decima Tertia, aucta, reformata. Crura Jo. Frid. Gmelin. 3 Volumes. Impensis Georg. Emanuel Beer, Lipsiae; deuxième impression J. B. Delamollière, Lugduni.Google Scholar
Gohar, H. A. F. and Soliman, G. N. 1963. On the rock-boring lamellibranch Rocellaria rüppelli (Deshayes). Publications of the Marine Biological Station, Al-Ghardaqa, Red Sea. Al-Ghardaqa Egypt, 12:145–158.Google Scholar
Gould, A. A. 1861. Descriptions of shells collected by the North Pacific exploring expeditions. Proceedings of the Boston Society of Natural History, 8:14–40.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E. 1840. Eastern Zoological Gallery, p. 89–156. In [multi-authored], Synopsis of the Contents of the British Museum, 42nd edition. G. Woodfall and Son, London, 370 p.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E. 1847. A list of the genera of Recent Mollusca, their synonyma and types. Zoological Society of London, Proceedings, Pt. 15(178): 129–219.Google Scholar
Guérin-Méneville, F. É. 1829-1844. Mollusques. In Guérin-Méneville, F. É and Cuvier, G., 1829-1844, Iconographie du Règne Animal de G. Cuvier; ou, Représentation dáprès Nature de lúne des Espèces les plus Remarquables, et Souvent non Encore Figurées, de Chaque Genre dánimaux. Avec un Texte Descriptif mis au Courant de la Science. Ouvrage Pouvant Servir d'Atlas à tous les Traités de Zoologie. Ballière, J. B., Paris. 3 Volumes: Tome I, Planches des Animaux Vertébrés; Tome II, Planches des Animaux Invertébrés; Tome III, Texte Explicatif. Text and plates with separately numbered parts within each volume. [Each volume bears the dates “1829-1844” on title page, but Tome III, section on “Mollusques”, p. [1-5] + p. 6-64, has “1829-1843” on its title page.]Google Scholar
Haneda, Y. 1939. Luminosity in Rocellaria grandis (Deshayes) (Lamellibranchia). Kagaku Nanyåo, 2:36–39. (In Japanese)Google Scholar
Haneda, Y. 1955. Luminous organs of Japan and the far east, p. 335–385. In Johnson, F. H. (ed.), The Luminescence of Biological Systems. Proceedings of the Conference on Luminescence, March 28-April 2, 1954, sponsored by the Committee on Photobiology of the National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council and supported by the National Science Foundation. American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, D.C., 452 p.Google Scholar
Hertlein, L. G. and Strong, A. M. 1950. Eastern Pacific expeditions of the New York Zoological Society. XLII. Mollusks from the west coast of Mexico and Central America, Pt. IX, Zoologica (New York), 35(19):217–252.Google Scholar
Hörnes, M. 1856-1867. In Hörnes, M., Partsch, P. M., and Ritter von Reuss, A. E., 1856-1870, Die Fossilen Mollusken des Tertiär-Beckens von Wien. Unter der Mitwirkung von Paul Partsch … bearb. von Dr. Moriz Hörnes … Hrsg. von der K. K. Geologischen Reichsanstalt … Wien, aus der K. K. Hof- und Staatsdruckerei. 2 Volumes, map, 2 atlases of plates (added title page: Abhandlungen der Kaiserlich-Königlichen Geologischen Reichsanstalt, III–IV Band). Band II by Hörnes and A. E. Reuss. See Band II: Bivalven. Wien, fasc. 1, 1859, p.1–116, pls. 1-11; fasc. 2, 1861, p. 117-214, pls. 12-31; fasc. 3, 1864, p. 215-342, pls. 32-44; fasc. 4, 1867, p. 343-430, pls. 45-67; fasc. 5, 1870, p. 431-479, pls. 68-85.Google Scholar
Hylleberg, J. 2001. Translations into English of Lorenz Spengler's papers on bivalves (1783-1798), Pt. 1, General introduction and references. Phuket Marine Biological Center Special Publication, 25(2):529–538.Google Scholar
Jeffreys, J. G. 1862-1869. British Conchology, or an Account of the Mollusca which now Inhabit the British Isles and the Surrounding Seas. 5 Volumes. Vol. 1, 1862, 341 p., frontispiece, 8 pls. Vol. 2, 1863, 466 p., frontispiece, 8 pls. Vol. 3, 1865, frontispiece, [1], 394 p., 8 pls. Vol. 4, 1867, Marine Shells, in Continuation of the Gastropoda as Far as the Bulla Family, frontispiece, [1] + 486 p., 8 pls. Vol. 5, Marine Shells and Naked Mollusca to the End of the Gastropoda, the Pteropoda, and Cephalopoda; with a Supplement and other Matter, concluding the Work; 1869, 259 p., frontispiece, 110 pls. John Van Voorst, London.Google Scholar
Kleemann, K. H. 1990. Boring and growth in chemically boring bivalves from the Caribbean, Eastern Pacific and Australia's Great Barrier Reef. Senckenbergiana Maritima Frankfurt am Main, Senckenbergische Naturforschende Gesellschaft, 21:101–154.Google Scholar
Knudsen, J. and Hylleberg, J. 2001. Translations into English of Lorenz Spengler's papers on bivalves (1783-1798), Pt. 2, -1783: A new genus, which may be called Gastrochaena. Phuket Marine Biological Center Special Publication, 25(2):539–546.Google Scholar
Kühnelt, W. 1933. Bohrmuschelstudien II. Palaeobiologica, Wien und Leipzig, 5(3):371–408.Google Scholar
Lacaze-Duthiers, H. 1854. Recherches sur les organes génitaux des Acéphales lamellibranches. Annales des Sciences Naturelles Comprenant la Zoologie, la Botanique, l'Anatomie et la Physiologie Comparée des Deux Règnes et l'Histoire des Corps Organisés Fossiles, ser. 4, 2:155–248.Google Scholar
Lacaze-Duthiers, H. 1855. Mémoire sue l'organe de Bojanus des Acéphales lamellibranches. Annales des Sciences Naturelles Comprenant la Zoologie, la Botanique, l'Anatomie et la Physiologie Comparée des Deux Règnes et l'Histoire des Corps Organisés Fossiles, ser. 4, 4:267–319, pls. 4-5.Google Scholar
Lamarck, J. B. P. A. de M. de. 1818. In de Lamarck, J. B. P. A. de M., 1815-1822, Histoire Naturelle des Animaux sans Vertèbres. Paris. Vol. 1, 1815; Vols. 2 and 3, 1816; Vol. 4, 1817; Vol. 5, 1818; Vol. 6. Pt. 1. 1819; Vol. 6. Pt. 2. 1822; Vol. 7, 1822.Google Scholar
Lamy, É. 1922. Notes sur les espèces Lamarckiennes appartenant à la famille des Gastrochaenidae. Bulletin du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, 28:307–311.Google Scholar
Lamy, É. 1923. Les Gastrochènes de la mer Rouge (d'après les matériaux recueillis par le Dr Jousseaume). Bulletin du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, 29:391–395.Google Scholar
Lamy, É. 1925. Revision des Gastrochaenidae vivants du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle de Paris. Journal de Conchyliologie, Paris, 68:284–319.Google Scholar
Mayer-Eymar, C. 1889. Descriptions de coquilles fossiles des terrains Tertiaires Superieurs. Journal de Conchyliologie, Paris, 37:229–244.Google Scholar
Mörch, O. A. L. “1870” [1871]. Uebersicht der von Lorentz Spengler beschriebenen Conchylien. Malakozoologishe Blatter, 17(3):99–124.Google Scholar
Nielsen, C. 1986. Fauna associated with the coral Porites from Phuket, Thailand, (Pt. 1), Bivalves with description of a new species of Gastrochaena. Phuket Marine Biological Center, Research Bulletin, 42:1–24.Google Scholar
Oliver, P. G. 1992. Bivalved Seashells of the Red Sea. Christa Hemmen and National Museums of Wales, Cardiff, 330 p.Google Scholar
Pallary, P. 1926. In Pallary, P., Dautzenberg, P., Dupuis, L. J., Koch, A., Lamy, E., Vayssière, A., and Vignal, L., 1926. Explication des planches de J. C. Savigny. Mémoires Présentés à l'Institut d'Egypte, Vol. 11, 139 p., 18 pls.Google Scholar
Pelseneer, P. 1891. Contribution à l'étude des Lamellibranches. Archives de Biologie, 11:147–312.Google Scholar
Pelseneer, P. 1911. Les Lamellibranches de l'expédition du Siboga. Partie anatomique. In Siboga-Expeditie. Uitkomsten op Zoologisch, Botanisch, Oceanographisch en Geologisch Gebied Verzameld in Nederlandsch Oost-Indie 1899-1900, aan Boord H. M. Siboga onder Command van Luitenant ter zee le kl. G. F. Tydeman Uitgegeven door Dr. Max Weber. E. J. Brill, Leiden. Monograph 53a, 125 p., 26 pls.Google Scholar
Pennant, T. 1777. In Pennant, T., 1766-1777, (Anonymous)British Zoology. 4 Volumes. Cymmorodorion Society, London, (fourth edition), 4 Volumes: Volume 1, 1766, Class I, Quadrupeds, II. Birds, Benjamin White, London, and William Eyres, Warrington, 1776…. Volume 4, 1777, Crustacea, Mollusca, Testacea, B, White, London, quarto and octavo editions were printed: either136p., 93 pls., or 154 + 2 p., 90 pls.Google Scholar
Philippi, R. A. 1845. Bemerkungen über einige Muschelgeschlechter, deren Thiere wenig bekannt sind. Wiegman's Archiv für Naturgeschichte, Jahrgang 11, 1:185–196.Google Scholar
Purchon, R. D. 1954. A note on the biology of the lamellibranch Rocellaria (Gastrochaena) cuneiformis Spengler. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 124:17–33.Google Scholar
Purchon, R. D. 1958. The stomach in the Eulamellibranchia; stomach type IV. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 131:487–525.Google Scholar
Retzius, A. J. 1788. Dissertatio Historico-Naturalis Sistens Nova Testaceorum Genera. Quam Venia Ampliss. Facult. Philosophicae Praeside D. M. Andr. J. Retzio [= A. J. Retzius], Ad Publicum Examen Defert Laurentius Münter Philippson Scanus. Ad Diem X. Decembris 1788. Typis Berlingianis, Lundae, [4] + 23 p.Google Scholar
Savigny, J.-C. 1817. Description de l'Égypte, ou Recueil des Observations et des Recherches qui ont été Faites en Egypte Pendant l'Expédition de l'Armée Française. Publiée par ordre du gouvernement. Histoire Naturelle. Planches, Volume II. Imprimerie Royal, Paris, 14 pls.Google Scholar
Schultz, O. 2005. Ein Systematisches Verzeichnis aller auf Österreichischem Gebiet Festgestellten Fossilien. In Piller, W. E. (ed.), Catalogus Fossilium Austriae. Band 1, Teil 3, Bivalvia Neogenica (Solenoidea—Clavagelloidea). Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Wien, p. 1–1067, pls. 96-152, p. 1069-1212.Google Scholar
Sismonda, E. 1847. Synopsis Methodica Animalium Invertebratorum Pedemontii Fossilium (Exceptis Speciebus Ineditus). Editio 2a, accuratior et aucta. 62 p., Augustae Taurinorum, Typis Regiis.Google Scholar
Sowerby, G. B. I. 1834. [Part of a series of reports titled only in the table of contents, p. viii, as “Characters of new genera and species of Mollusca and Conchifera, collected by Mr. Cuming”, published by G. B. Sowerby I and W. Broderip, in 1832-1834]. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, Pt. II, 1834, 15:21-22.Google Scholar
Sowerby, G. B. II. 1878. Monograph of the Genus Gastrochaena. In Reeve, L. A., continued by G. B. Sowerby II, 1843-1878. Conchologia Iconica, or, Illustrations of the Shells of Molluscous Animals, 20 Vols. Vol. 20, 177 pls., 1875-1878; fasc. 14, 11 p. (= pls. 1-4 with explanations), 1878. L. Reeve, London.Google Scholar
Spengler, L. 1783. Lorentz Spenglers Beskrivelse over en nye Slægt af toskallede Muskeler, som kan kaldes Gastrochaena, i tre foranderlige Arter, hvoraf hver boer i et forskielligt Ormehus. Nye Samling af det Kongelige Danske Videnskabers Selskabs Skrifter, 2:174–183.Google Scholar
Spengler, L. 1793. Beskrivelse over et nyt Slægt af de toskallede Konkylier, forhen af mig kaldet Chaena, saa og over det Linneiske Slægt Mya, hvilket noeiere bestemmes, og inddeles i tvende Slægter. [Description of a new genus of the bivalved shells by me previously called Chaena as well as of the Linnean genus Mya that is identified in detail and separated into two genera.] Skrifter af Naturhistorie-Selskabet (Kiøbenhavn), 3(1): 16–51.Google Scholar
Squires, R. L. 2001. Additions to the Eocene Megafossil Fauna of the Llajas Formation, Simi Valley, Southern California. Contributions in Science, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 489:1–40.Google Scholar
Stephenson, L. W. 1937. The stratigraphic significance of Kummelia, a new Eocene bivalve genus from New Jersey. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 27(2):58–64.Google Scholar
Sturany, R. 1899. Lamellibranchiaten des Rothen Meeres. In Expedition S. M. Schiff “Pola” in das Rothe Meer, nördliche und südliche Hälfte, 1895/96 und 1897/98. Zoologische Ergebnisse XIV. Denkschriften der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Wien. Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Classe, 69:255–295.Google Scholar
Thiele, J. 1934. In Thiele, J., 1929-1935, Handbuch der Systematischen Weichtierkunde, Zweiter Band. Gustav Fischer, Jena, 4 Vols., p. 1–1154, 773 text-figs. [four parts subsequently issued as 2 Volumes]. Vol 1. Pt. 1. p. 1-376, published 1929; Vol. 1. Pt. 2. p. 377-778, figs. 1-783, published 1931; Vol. 2. Pt. 3. p. 779-1022, published 1934; Vol. 2. Pt. 4. p. 1023-1154, figs. 784-879, published 1935.Google Scholar
Tryon, G. W. Jr. 1862. Synopsis of the Recent species of Gastrochaenidae, a family of acephalous Mollusca. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia for 1861:465–494.Google Scholar
Vokes, H. E. 1938. Upper Miocene Mollusca from Trinidad. American Museum Novitates, 988:1–28.Google Scholar
Yonge, C. M. 1926. The digestive diverticula in the lamellibranchs. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 54(3):703–718.Google Scholar
Yonge, C. M. 1982. Mantle margins with a revision of siphonal types in the Bivalvia. Journal of Molluscan Studies, 48:102–103.Google Scholar