Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-8p85h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-14T14:45:38.848Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Check-List of British Marine Algae–Second Revision

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Mary Parke  and
Peter S. Dixon
Mary Parke
Affiliation:
The Plymouth Laboratory
Peter S. Dixon
Affiliation:
Department of Organismic Biology, University of California, Irvine, California, 92664.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Preliminary Check-list of British Marine Algae (Parke, 1953), with three subsequent lists of additions and corrections (Parke, 1956, 1957, 1959), was superseded by the Revised Check-list of British Marine Algae (Parke & Dixon, 1964). Since the publication of the latter, changes, both taxonomic and systematic, have been sufficiently numerous to warrant the present list incorporating additions, corrections and emendations.

The authors take full responsibility for all the changes from the 1964 Check-list. The responsibility for the preparation of the lists of species for each Class in the 1964 Check-list was as follows: (1) Cyanophyceae, H. T. Powell; (2) Rhodophyceae, P. S. Dixon; (3) Cryptophyceae, M. Parke; (4) Dinophyceae, D. Ballantine & M. Parke; (5) Haptophyceae, M. Parke; (6) Chrysophyceae, M. Parke; (7) Craspedophyceae, M. Parke; (8) Xanthophyceae, M. Parke; (9) Phaeophyceae, H. Bladder, G. Russell, P. S. Dixon & M. Parke; (10) Prasinophyceae, M. Parke; (11) Chlorophyceae, E. M. Burrows, P. S. Dixon & M. Parke.

The sequences of classes is as in the 1964 Check-list and there have been no changes in the geographical limits used therein (the coasts of Britain and Ireland or in adjacent waters, i.e. the sea area bounded by 47° N. and 63° N., 11° E. and 30° W.). Three classes (Bacillariophyceae, Rhaphidophyceae, Euglenophyceae) are still not represented and the authors would be grateful for records of marine species of these in order to facilitate their inclusion at some time in the future.

The compilers welcome any comments on the Revised Check-list (1964) or the present list.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 48 , Issue 3 , October 1968 , pp. 783 - 832
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ab´e, T. H., 1967a. The armoured Dinoflagellata: II. Prorocentridae and Dinophysidae (A). Publs Seto mar. biol. Lab., Vol. 14, pp. 369–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abé, T. H., 1967b. The armoured Dinoflagellata: II. Prorocentridae and Dinophysidae (B). Publs Seto mar. biol. Lab., Vol. 15, pp. 37–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adey, W. H., 1964. The genus Phymatolithon in the Gulf of Maine. Hydrobiologia, Vol. 24, PP. 377–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adey, W. H., 1966a. The genus Pseudolithophyllum (Corallinaceae) in the Gulf of Maine. Hydrobiologia, Vol. 27, pp. 479–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adey, W. H., 1966b. The genera Lithothamnium, Leptophytum (nov. gen.) and Phymatolithon in the Gulf of Maine. Hydrobiologia, Vol. 28, pp. 321–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anand, P. L., 1937. A taxonomic study of the algae of the British chalk-cliffs. J. Bot., Lond., Vol. 75, Suppl., pp. 1–51.Google Scholar
Arasaki, S. & Tokida, H., 1961. On the life history of Monostroma, especially on the Gomontia like development of certain species. Abs. 10th Pacif. sci. Congr. (no pagination).Google Scholar
Ardré, F., 1961. Remarques sur les Codium de la Côte Basque. Bull. Cent. Étud. Rech. sclent., Biarritz, T. 3, pp. 489–494.Google Scholar
Balech, E., 1944. Contribution al conocimiento del plancton de Lennox y Cabo de Hornos. Physis, B. Aires, T. 19, No. 54, pp. 423–446.Google Scholar
Balech, E., 1956. Etude des dinoflagelles du sable de Roscoff. Revue algol., N.S., T. 2, pp. 29–52.Google Scholar
Balech, E., 1963. La Familia Podolampacea (Dinoflagellata). Boletin Inst. Biol. mar. Univ. nac. B. Aires, No. 2, pp. 3–30.Google Scholar
Balech, E., 1964. El plancton de Mar del Plata durante el periodo 1961–1962 (Buenos Aires, Argentina). Bol. Inst. Biol. mar. Univ. nac. B. Aires, No. 4, pp. 1–49.Google Scholar
Balech, E., 1967. Dinoflagelados nuevos o interesantes del Golfo de Mexico y Caribe. Revta Mus. argent. Cienc. nat. Bernardino Rivadavia Inst. nac. Invest dene. Nat. (Hidrobiol.), T. 2, No. 3, pp. 77–126.Google Scholar
Batters, E. A. L., 1888. A description of three new marine algae. J. Linn. Soc. (Bot.), Vol. 24, pp. 450–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batters, E. A. L., 1896. New or critical British marine algae. J. Bot. Lond., Vol. 34, pp. 384–90.Google Scholar
Batters, E. A. L., 1902. A catalogue of the British marine algae, … J. Bot., Lond., Vol. 40, Suppl., pp. 1–107.Google Scholar
Bert, J. J., 1964. Développement des spores chez une algue rouge Callophyllis laciniata (Hudson) Kutzing. Bull. Soc. linn. Normandie, S´er. 10, Vol. 5, pp. 112–119.Google Scholar
Bert, J. J., 1965. Sur la structure et le développement de l'appareil reproducteur femelle de Dilsea carnosa (Schmidel) Kuntze et la position systématique du genre Dilsea. C.r. hebd. Seanc. Acad. Sci., Paris, T. 261, pp. 2702–2704.Google Scholar
Bert, J. J., 1967. Étude de Callophyllis (Rhodophycées, Cryptonémialess) des côtes de France. Revue gen. Bot., T. 74, pp. 5–29.Google Scholar
Blecheler, B., 1952. Recherches sur les Péridiniens. Bull. biol. Fr. Belg., Suppl. 36, 149 pp.Google Scholar
Bliding, C., 1955. Enteromorpha intermedia. A new species from the coasts of Sweden, England and Wales. Bot. Notiser, Vol. 108, pp. 253–62.Google Scholar
Bliding, C., 1963. A critical survey of European taxa in Ulvales. Op. bot. Soc. bot. Lund., Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 1–160.Google Scholar
Blum, John L., 1960. A new Vaucheria from New England. Trans. Am. microsc. Soc, Vol. 79, pp. 298–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boddeke, R., 1958. The genus Callithamnion Lyngb. in the Netherlands. A taxonomic and oecological study. Acta bot. neerl., Vol. 7, pp. 589–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Böhm, A., 1936. Dinoflagellates of the coastal waters of the Western Pacific. Bernice P. Bishop Museum, Bull., Vol. 137, pp. 1–54.Google Scholar
Boillot, A., 1965. Sur l'alternance de générations hétéromorphes d'une Rhodophycée, Halarachnion ligulatum (Woodward) Kützing (Gigartinales, Furcellariacees). C. r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci., Paris, T. 261, pp. 4191–4193.Google Scholar
Bornet, E. & Flahault, C., 1886–88. Revision des Nostocacées hétérocytées. Annls Sci. nat. (Bot.), S´er. 7, T. 3, 1886, pp. 323–81; T. 4, 1886, pp. 343–73; T. 5, 1887, pp. 51–129; T. 7, 1888, pp. 177–262.Google Scholar
Boucaud-Camou, E., 1966. Les Choanoflagellés des côtes de la Manche: I. Systematique. Bull. Soc. linn. Normandie, S´er. 10, Vol. 7, pp. 191–209.Google Scholar
Bourrelly, P., 1960. Les genres Bicoeca, Codomonas, Calycomonas et Codonomonas. Revue algol., N.S., T. 5, pp. 212–14.Google Scholar
Bourrelly, P. & Denizot, M., 1967. Quelques algues marines des niveaux eleves de la Falaise d'Etretat (Seine-Maritime). Travaux de Biologie Vegetale dedies au Professeur Pierre Dangeard, Botaniste, S´er. 50, pp. 43–58.Google Scholar
Bursa, A., 1959. The genus Prorocentrum Ehrenberg. Morphodynamics, protoplasmatic structures, and taxonomy. Can. J. Bot., Vol. 37, pp. 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butcher, R. W., 1959. An introductory account of the smaller algae of British coastal waters. Part I. Introduction and Chlorophyceae. Fishery Invest., Lond., S´er. 4, 74 pp.Google Scholar
Butcher, R. W., 1961. An introductory account of the smaller algae of British coastal waters. Part VIII. Euglenophyceae = Euglenineae. Fishery Invest., Lond., S´er. 4, 17 pp.Google Scholar
Butcher, R. W., 1967. An introductory account of the smaller algae of British coastal waters. Part IV. Cryptophyceae. Fishery Invest., Lond., S´er. 4, 54 pp.Google Scholar
Caram, B., 1966. Sur la reproduction de deux Striariacees des eaux danoises. C. r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci., Paris, T. 262, pp. 2333–2335.Google Scholar
Cardinal, A., 1964. Étude sur les Ectocarpacees de la Manche. Beih. Nova Hedwigia, Heft 15, 86 pp.Google Scholar
Carter, N., 1937. New or interesting algae from brackish water. Arch. Protistenk., Bd. 90, pp. 1–68.Google Scholar
Chadefaud, M. & Feldmann, J., 1949. Sur une Coccolithophoracéc des bacs de l'aquarium de la Station Biologique de Roscoff. Bull. Mus. natn. Hist, nat., Paris, S´er. 2, T. 21, pp. 617–621.Google Scholar
Chatton, E., 1920. Les Péridiniens parasites. Morphologie, reproduction, ethologie. Archs Zool. exp. gén., Vol. 59, pp. 1–475.Google Scholar
Chihara, M., 1957. Studies on the life-history of the green algae in the warm seas around Japan. (5) On the life-history of Pseudulvella sp. J. Jap. Bot., Vol. 32, pp. 101–9.Google Scholar
Chihara, M., 1962. Occurrence of the Gomontia-like phase in the life-history of certain species belonging to Collinsiella and Monostroma (a preliminary note). J. Jap. Bot., Vol. 37, pp. 44–45.Google Scholar
Chihara, M., 1963. The life-history of Prasinocladusascus as found in Japan, with special reference to the systematic position of the genus. Phycologia, Vol. 3, pp. 19–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, T., 1957a. Three species of Vaucheria new to Britain. Phycol. Bull., Vol. 1, No. 5, P. 43.Google Scholar
Christensen, T., 1957b. Chaetomorpha linum in the attached state. Bot. Tidsskr., Bd. 53, pp. 311–16.Google Scholar
Christensen, T., 1962. Alger. In Böcher, T. W., Lange, M. & Sorensen, T., Botanik, Bd. 2 (Systematisk Botanik), Nr. 2, 178 pp.Google Scholar
Christensen, T., 1966. Alger. In Böcher, T. W., Lange, M. & Sorensen, T., Botanik, Bd. 2 (Systematisk Botanik), Nr 2, Udg. 2, 180 pp.Google Scholar
Christensen, T., 1967. Two new families and some new names and combinations in the algae. Blumea, Vol. 15, pp. 91–94.Google Scholar
Christensen, T., 1968. Vaucheria types in the Dillenían Herbaría. Br. phycol. Bull., Vol. 3, pp. 463–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cienkowski, L., 1881. An account of the White Sea Excursion for 1880. (In Russian.) Trudy imp. S-peterb. Obshch. Estest., T. 12, pp. 130–71.Google Scholar
Claparede, E. & Lachmann, J., 1859. Études sur les Infusoires et les Rhizopodes. Mem. Inst. natn. génev., T. 6, pp. 261–482.Google Scholar
Cleve, P. T., 1900. Notes on some Atlantic plankton-organisms. K. svenska Vetensk Akad. Handl., Vol. 34, No. I, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
Conrad, W. & Kufferath, H., 1954. Recherches sur les eaux saumatres des environs de Lilloo. II. Partie descriptive. Algues et Protistes. Considerations ecologiques. Mem. Inst. r. Sci. nat. Belg., No 127, pp. 1–346.Google Scholar
Dangeard, P., 1958. La reproduction et le développement de YEnteromorpha marginata Ag. et le rattachement de cette espèce au genre Blidingia. C. r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci., Paris, T. 246, pp. 347–51.Google Scholar
Dangeard, P., 1961. Le probleme de l'espece avec reference au groupe des Ulvacees. Botaniste, S´er. 44, pp. 21–36.Google Scholar
Dangeard, P., 1962. Sur le développement du Petalonia fascia (Mueller) Kuntze et du Scytosiphon lomentaria (Lyngbye) Endlicker. C. r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci., Paris, T. 254, pp. 3290–3292.Google Scholar
Dangeard, P., 1963a. Sur le développement de Punctaria latifolia Greville récolté dans le bassin d'Archachon. Botaniste, S´er. 46, pp. 205–224.Google Scholar
Dangeard, P., 1963b. Recherches sur le cycle évolutif de quelques Scytosiphonacées. Botaniste, S´er. 46, pp. 1–132.Google Scholar
Dangeard, P., 1964. Le plethysmothalle á sporocystes uniloculaires de Petalonia zosterifolia. Phycologia, Vol. 4. pp. 15–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dangeard, P., 1965a. Sur un Myriotrichia Harvey recolte a Saint-Vaast La Hougue (Cotentin). Botaniste, S´er. 49, pp. 79–98.Google Scholar
Dangeard, P., 1965b. A propos des Codium à utricules mucronés. Botaniste, S´er. 48, pp. 85–98.Google Scholar
Dangeard, P., 1966. Sur la présence d'un pléthysmothalle chez Leptonematella fasciculatum (Reinke) Silva. C. r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci., Paris, T. 263, pp. 1692–1694.Google Scholar
Dangeard, P., 1967. A propos des Ulva lactuca L. et Ulva thuretii Føyn. Soc. phycol. Fr. Bull., No. 11 (1965), pp. 11–12.Google Scholar
Deflandre, G., 1951. Recherches sur les Ébriediens. Paléobiologie. Évolution. Systématique. Bull. biol. Fr. Belg., T. 85, pp. 1–84.Google Scholar
Deflandre, G., 1960. Sur la présence de Parvicorbicula n.g. socialis (Meunier) dans le plancton de l'Antarctique (Terre Adelie). Revue algol., N.S., T. 5, pp. 183–8.Google Scholar
Desikachary, T. V., 1959. Cyanophyta. Indian Council of Agricultural Research Monograph. x + 686 pp. New York and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
De Valera, M., 1966. The occurrence in Ireland of an alga answering the description of Grateloupia dichotoma J. Ag. Ir. Nat. J., Vol. 15, pp. 151–152.Google Scholar
Dixon, P. S., 1958. The morphology, ecology and taxonomy of certain Florideae. Phycol. Bwl., Vol. 1, No. 6, pp. 32–3.Google Scholar
Dixon, P. S., 1959. Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the Florideae. I. Bot. Notiser, Vol. 112, pp. 339–52.Google Scholar
Dixon, P. S., 1960a. Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the Florideae. II. Bot. Notiser, Vol. 113, pp. 295–319.Google Scholar
Dixon, P. S., 1960b. Studies on marine algae of the British Isles: Ceramium shuttleworthianum (Kütz.) Silva. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 39, pp. 375–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, P. S., 1961a. List of marine algae collected in the Channel Islands … Br. phycol. Bull., Vol. 2, pp. 71–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, P. S., 1961b. On the classification of the Florideae, with particular reference to the position of the Gelidiaceae. Botanica mar., Vol. 3, pp. 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, P. S., 1962a. A critical survey of the evidence for the occurrence of Helminthocladia agardhiana Dixon [H. hudsoni J. Ag. pro parte] in Europe. Br. phycol. Bull., Vol. 2, pp. 145–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, P. S., 1962b. The genus Ptilothamnion in Europe and North Africa. Br. phycol. Bull., Vol. 2, pp. 154–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, P. S., 1962c. Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the Florideae. III. Bot. Notiser, Vol. 115, pp. 245–60.Google Scholar
Dixon, P. S., 1963a. Sphondylothamnion multifidum (Huds.) Näg. in western Europe. Br. phycol. Bull., Vol. 2, pp. 219–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, P. S., 1963b. The rejection of Ctenosiphonia hypnoides (Welw. ex J. Ag.) Falkenb. from the British marine algal flora. Br. phycol. Bull., Vol. 2, pp. 263–5.Google Scholar
Dixon, P. S., 1964a. Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the Florideae. IV. Bot. Notiser, Vol. 117, 56–78.Google Scholar
Dixon, P. S., 1964b. The British marine Rhodophyta: some further deletions and corrections. Br. phycol. Bull., Vol. 2, pp. 393–4.Google Scholar
Dixon, P. S., 1967. The typification of Fucus cartilagineus L. and F. corneus Huds. Blumea, Vol. 15. pp. 55–62Google Scholar
Dixon, P. S. & De Valera, M., 1961. A critical survey of the evidence for the occurrence of Gelidium torulosum Kütz. and G. melanoideum Schousb. ex Born, in Britain and Ireland. Br. phycol. Bull., Vol. 2, pp. 67–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, P. S. & Parkes, H. M., 1968. Miscellaneous notes on algal taxonomy and nomenclature. II. Bot. Notiser, Vol. 121, pp. 36–44.Google Scholar
Dixon, P. S. & Russell, G., 1964. Miscellaneous notes on algal taxonomy and nomenclature. I. Bot. Notiser, Vol. 117, pp. 279–84.Google Scholar
Dodge, J. D., 1967. Fine structure of the dinoflagellate Aureodinium pigmentosum gén. et sp. nov. Br. phycol. Bull., Vol. 3, pp. 327–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dragesco, J., 1965. Étude cytologique de quelques Flagelles mesopsammiques. Cah. Biol. mar., Vol. 6, pp. 83–115.Google Scholar
Drew, K. M., 1958. Studies in the Bangiophycidae. IV. The Conchocelis-phase of Bangia fuscopurpurea (Dillw.) Lyngb. in culture. Pubbl. Staz. zool. Napoli, Vol. 30, pp. 358–72.Google Scholar
Drew, K. M. & Ross, R., 1965. Some generic names in the Bangiophycidae. Taxon, Vol. 14, P. 93–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Droop, M. R., 1962. Heteramoeba clara n. gen., n. sp., a sexual biphasic amoeba. Arch. Mikrobiol., Bd. 42, pp. 254–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drouet, F., 1963. Ecophenes of Schizothrix calcicola (Oscillatoriaceae). Proc. Acad. nat. Sci. Philad., Vol. 115, pp. 261–81.Google Scholar
Drouet, F. & Daily, W. A., 1956. Revision of the coccoid Myxophyceae. Butler Univ. bot. Stud., Vol. 12, pp. 1–218.Google Scholar
Dube, M. A., 1962. Life-history of Monostroma pulchrum var. splendens (Rupr.) Rosenv. Am. J. Bot., Vol. 49, p. 67.Google Scholar
Dube, M. A., 1967. On the life history of Monostroma fuscum (Postels et Ruprecht) Wittrock. J. Phycol., Vol. 3, pp. 64–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duboscq, O. & Tuzet, O., 1938. La colerette des choanocytes chez les Eponges calcaires hétérocoeles. C. r. Séanc. Soc. Biol., Paris, T. 129, pp. 296–8.Google Scholar
Ellis, W. N., 1930. Recent researches on the Choanoflagellata (Craspedomonadines). Annls Soc. r. zool. Belg., T. 60, pp. 49–88.Google Scholar
Ettl, H., 1967. Chlamydomonas parkeae, eine neue marine Chlamydomonade. Int. Revue ges. Hydrobiol. Hydrogr., Bd. 52, pp. 437–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fan, K. C, 1956. Revision of Calothrix Ag. Revue algol., N.S., T. 2, pp. 154–78.Google Scholar
Feldmann, G., 1967. Le genre Cordylecladia J. Ag. (Rhodophyées, Rhodyméniales) et sa position systématique. Revue gén. Bot., T. 74, pp. 357–75.Google Scholar
Feldmann, J., 1953. Deux nouvelles Cyanophycées marines de Roscoff. Bull. Soc. bot. Fr., T. 100, pp. 292–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldmann, J., 1954. Inventaire de la flore marine de Roscoff. Trav. Stn biol. Roscoff, N.S., Suppl. 6, pp. 1–152.Google Scholar
Feldmann, J., 1955. Un nouveau genre de Protofloridee:Colacodictyon nov. gen. Bull. Soc. hot. Fr., T. 102, pp. 23–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldmann, J., 1958. Les Vaucheria marins et d'eau saumâtre des environs de Roscoff (Finistère). Soc. phycol. Fr. Bull., No. 4, pp. 11–13.Google Scholar
Feldmann, J., 1963. The Rhodophyta order Acrochaetiales and its classification. Proc. IX Pacif. Sci. Congr., Vol. 4, pp. 219–21.Google Scholar
Feldmann, J., 1967. Sur une Bangiophycee endozoique (Neevea repens Batters) et ses arfinités (Rhodophyta). Blumea, Vol. 15, pp. 25–9.Google Scholar
Feldmann, J. & Hamel, G., 1936. Floridées de France. VII. Gelidiales. Revue algol., T. 9, pp. 85–140.Google Scholar
Fremy, P., 1934. Cyanophycées des côtes d'Europe. Mém. Soc. natn. Sci. nat. math. Cherbourg, T. 41, pp. 1–235.Google Scholar
Fritsch, F. E., 1945. The Structure and Reproduction of the Algae, Vol. 2, xiv + 939 pp. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gaarder, K. R., 1954. Dinoflagellatae from the ‘Michael Sars’ North Atlantic Deep-Sea Expedition, 1910. Rep. Sars. N. Atl. Deep Sea Exped., Vol. 2, No. 3, 62 pp.Google Scholar
Gaarder, K. R., 1967. Observations on the genus Ophiaster Gran (Coccolithineae). Sarsia, Vol. 29, pp. 183–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaarder, K. R. & Markali, J., 1956. On the coccolithophorid Crystallolithus hyalinus n. gen., n. sp. Nytt Mag. Bot., Vol. 5, pp. 1–5.Google Scholar
Gayral, P., 1961a. Feldmannodora chadefaudii (J. Feldm.) Chadefaud, espece nouvelle pour les lies anglo-normandes. Revue algol., N.S., T. 5, p. 289.Google Scholar
Gayral, P., 1961b. Sur la reproduction de Monostroma obscurum (Kütz.) J. Ag. C. r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci., Paris, T. 252, pp. 1642–4.Google Scholar
Gayral, P., 1962. Reproduction et développement de Monostroma obscurum (Kütz.) J. Agardh. Bull. Soc. bot. Fr., T. 109, pp. 53–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gayral, P., 1964. Sur le démembrement de l'actuel genre Monostroma Thuret (Chlorophycées, Ulothricales s.l.). C. r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci., Paris, T. 258, pp. 2149–2152.Google Scholar
Gayral, P., 1965. Monostroma Thuret, Ulvaria Rupr. emend. Gayral, Ulvopsis Gayral. (Chlorophycées, Ulotrichales): structure, reproduction, cycles, position systematique. Revue gén. Bot., T. 72, pp. 627–638.Google Scholar
Geitler, L., 1930–32. Cyanophyceae. In L., Rabenhorst, Kryptogamen-Flora von Deutschland, Osterreich und der Schweiz, Bd. 14, vi + 1196 pp. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Geitler, L., 1942. Schizophyceae. In Engler, A. & Prantl, K., Die Natiirlichen Pflanzenfamilien, 2nd ed., Bd. I b, iv + 232 pp. Berlin.Google Scholar
George, E. A., 1957. A note on Stichococcus bacillaris Naeg. and some species of Chlorella as marine algae. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 36, pp. 111–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibb, D. C, 1957. The free-living forms of Ascophyllym nodosum (L.) Le Jol. J. Ecol., Vol. 45, pp. 49–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsburg-Ardré, F., 1966. Dermocarpa, Xenococcus, Dermocarpella (Cyanophycées): nouvelles observations. Öst. bot. Z., Bd. 113, pp. 362–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomont, M., 1892–93. Monographic des Oscillariees (Nostocacées homocystees). Annls Sci. nat. (Bot.), S´er. 7, T. 15, 1892, pp. 263–368; T. 16, 1893, pp. 91–264.Google Scholar
Graham, H. W. & Bronikovsky, N., 1944. The genus Ceratium in the Pacific and North Atlantic Oceans. Scient. Results Cruise VII Carnegie, Biol. V, vii + 209 pp.Google Scholar
Haas-Niekerk, T. De, 1965. The genus Sphacelaria Lyngbye (Phaeophyceae) in the Netherlands. Blumea, Vol. 13, pp. 145–61.Google Scholar
Halldal, P., 1953. Phytoplankton investigations from Weathership M in the Norwegian Sea 1948–1949. Hvalräd. Skr., Nr. 38, pp. 1–91.Google Scholar
Hamel, G. & Lemoine, P., 1952. Corallinacées de France et d'Afrique du Nord. Archs Mus. natn. Hist, nat., Paris, S´er. 7, T. 1, pp. 17–136.Google Scholar
Harris, R. E., 1962. Contribution to the taxonomy of Callithamnion Lyngbye emend. Naegeli. Bot. Notiser, Vol. 115, pp. 18–28.Google Scholar
Harvey, W. H., 1849. Phycologia britannica:…, Vol. 2, vi. pp., pls. 121–240. London.Google Scholar
Hendey, N. I., 1954. A preliminary check-list of British marine diatoms. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 33, pp. 537–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendey, N. I., 1964. An introductory account of the smaller algae of British coastal waters. Part V. Bacillariophyceae (Diatoms). Fishery Invest., Lond., Ser. 4, 317 pp.Google Scholar
Hirose, H. & Yoshida, K., 1964. A review of the life histories of the genus Monostroma. Bull. Jap. Soc. Phycol. Vol. 12, pp. 19–31.Google Scholar
Hoek, C. Van Den, 1963. Revision of the European species of Cladophora. xi + 248 pp. Leiden.Google Scholar
Hoek, C. Van Den, 1964. Criteria and procedures in present-day algal taxonomy. In Jackson, D. F., Algae and man. x + 434 pp. New York.Google Scholar
Van Den, Hoek C., 1966. Taxonomic criteria in four chlorophycean genera. Nova Hedungia, Bd 10, pp. 367–386.Google Scholar
Van Den, Hoek C. & Donze, M., 1966. The Algal Vegetation Of The Rocky Côte Basque (Sw France.) Bull. Cent. Etud. Rech. scient., Biarritz, T. 6, pp. 289–319.Google Scholar
Hollenberg, G. & Abbott, I. A., 1966. Supplement to Smith's Marine algae of the Monterey Peninsula. xii + 130 pp. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hope, B., 1954. Floristic and taxonomic observations on marine phytoplankton from Nordasvatn, near Bergen. Nytt Mag. Bot., Vol. 2, pp. 149–53.Google Scholar
Hulburt, E. M., 1965. Three closely allied dinoflagellates. J. Phycol., Vol. I, pp. 95–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irvine, D. E. G., 1956. Notes on British species of the genus Sphacelaria Lyngb. Trans. Proc. bot. Soc. Edinb., Vol. 37, pp. 24–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iwamoto, K., 1960. On four species of Monostroma in Tokyo Bay. J. Tokyo Univ. Fish., Vol. 47, pp. 93–101.Google Scholar
Javornicky, P., 1962. Two scarcely known genera of the class Dinophyceae: Bernardinium Chodat and Crypthecodinium Biecheler. Preslia, Bd. 34, pp. 98–113.Google Scholar
Jepps, M. W., 1937. On the protozoan parasites of Calanus finmarchicus in the Clyde Sea Area. Q. Jl microsc. Sci., Vol. 79, pp. 589–658.Google Scholar
Jones, W. E., 1962. The identity of Gracilaria erecta (Grev.) Grev. Br. phycol. Bull., Vol. 2, pp. 140–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonsson, S., 1962. Recherches sur des Cladophoracées marines (structure, reproduction, cycles comparés, conséquences systeématiques). Annls Sci. nat. (Bot.), S´er. 12, T. 3, pp. 25–230.Google Scholar
Jónsson, S., 1966. Sur l'identification du sporophyte du Spongomorpha lanosa (Roth) Kütz. C. r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci., Paris, T. 262, pp. 626–629.Google Scholar
Jörgensen, E., 1923. Mediterranean Dinophysiaceae. Rep. Dan. oceanogr. Exped. Mediterr., Vol. 2, Biology, J. 2, pp. 1–48.Google Scholar
Kamptner, E., 1944. Coccolithineen-Studien im Golf von Neapel. Ost. bot. Z., Bd. 93, pp. 138–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kida, W., 1964. On the morphology and life-history of Monostroma wittrockii Bornet from Ise Bay. Rep. Fac. Fish, prefect. Univ. Mie, Vol. 5, pp. 11–18.Google Scholar
Kida, W., 1967. Studies on the morphology and ecology of Monostroma in Ise Bay and vicinity, Japan. J. Fac. Fish pref. Univ. Mie-Tsu, Vol. 7, pp. 81–164.Google Scholar
Kofoid, C. A., 1907. Dinoflagellata of the San Diego Region. III. Descriptions of new species. Univ. Calif. Publs Zooh, Vol. 3, pp. 299–340.Google Scholar
Kofoid, C. A., & Skogsberg, T., 1928. The Dinoflagellata: The Dinophysoidae. Mém. Mus. comp. Zool. Harv., Vol. 51, pp. 1–766.Google Scholar
Komarek, J., 1965. Homeothrix (Thur. ex Born, et Flah.) Kirchn. 1898, nomen conservandum propositum [pp. 7–9]. In, Stafleu, F. A., Nomina conservanda proposita II. Proposals on the conservation of generic names submitted to the eleventh International Botanical Congress, Seattle—1969. Regnum veg., Vol. 40, pp. 1–32.Google Scholar
Kornmann, P., 1955. Beobachtungen an Phaeocystis-Kulturen. Helgoländer wiss. Meersunters. Bd. 5, pp. 218–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornmann, P., 1960. Die heterogene Gattung Gomontia. II. Der fadige Anteil, Eugomontia sacculata nov. gen. nov. spec. Helgolānder wiss. Meeresunters., Bd. 7, pp. 59–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornmann, P., 1961. Zur Kenntnis der Porphyra-Aiten von Helgoland. Helgoldnder zoiss. Meeresunters., Bd. 8, pp. 176–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornmann, P., 1962a. Eine Revision der Gattung Acrosiphonia. Helgoländer wiss. Meeresunters, Bd. 8, pp. 219–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornmann, P., 1962b. Zur Entwicklung von Monostroma grevillei und zur systematischen Stellung von Gomontia polyrhiza. Vortr. GesGeb. Bot., N.F., Bd. 1, pp. 37–9.Google Scholar
Kornmann, P., 1962c. Die Entwicklung von Monostroma grevillei. Helgoländer wiss. Meeresunters, Bd. 8, pp. 195–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornmann, P., 1963. Die Ulotrichales, neu Geordnet auf der Grundlage entwicklungsgeschichtlicher Befunde. Phycologia, Vol. 3, pp. 60–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornmann, P., 1964a. Zur Biologie von Spongomorpha aeruginosa (Linnaeus) van den Hoek. Helgoländer wiss. Meeresunters., Bd. 11, pp. 200–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornmann, P., 1964b. Über Monostroma bullosum (Roth) Thuret und M. oxyspermum (Kütz.) Doty. Helgoländer wiss. Meeresunters., Bd. 11, pp. 13–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornmann, P., 1964c. Die Ulothrix-Anen von Helgoland. I. Helgoländer wiss. Meeresunters, Bd. 11, pp. 27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornmann, P., 1965a. Porphyridium violaceum, eine marine neue Art. Helogldnder wiss. Meeresunters., Bd, 12, pp. 420–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornmann, P., 1965b. Ontogenie und Lekenszyklus der Ulotrichales in phylogenetischer Sicht. Phycologia, Vol. 4, pp. 163–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornmann, P. & Sahling, P., 1962. Zur Taxonomie und Entwicklung der Monostroma- Arten von Helgoland. Helgoländer wiss. Meeresunters., Bd. 8, pp. 302–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuckuck, P., 1954. Ectocarpaceen-Studien II. Streblonema. Helgoländer zuiss. Meeresunters. Bd. 5, pp. 103–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuckuck, P., 1955. Ectocarpaceen-Studien III. Protectocarpus nov.gen. Helgoländer wiss. Meeresunters., Bd. 5, pp. 119–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuckuck, P., 1958. Ectocarpaceen-Studien V. Kuckuckia, Feldmannia. Helgoländer wiss. Meeresunters., Bd. 6, pp. 171–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuckuck, P., 1960. Ectocarpaceen-Studien VI. Spongonema. Helgoländer wiss. Meeresunters., Bd. 7, pp. 93–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kylin, H., 1956. Die Gattungen der Rhodophyceen. xx + 673 pp. Lund.Google Scholar
Lanjouw, J.et al., 1966. International Code of Botanical Nomenclature adopted by the Tenth International Botanical Congress, Edinburgh, August 1964. 402 pp. Utrecht.Google Scholar
Leadbeater, B. & Dodge, J. D., 1966. The fine structure of Woloszynskia micra sp. nov., a new marine dinoflagellate. Br. phycol. Bull., Vol. 3, pp. 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebour, M. V., 1922. Plymouth Peridinians. III. A new species of Phalacroma. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 12, pp. 817–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebour, M. V., 1925. The Dinoflagellates of Northern Seas. 250 pp. Plymouth.Google Scholar
Lecal, J. & Bernheim, M., 1960. Microstructure du squelette de quelques Coccolithophorides. Bull. Soc. Hist. nat. Afr. N., T. 51, 273–300.Google Scholar
Lewis, J. R., 1964. The Ecology of Rocky Shores, xii + 323 pp. London.Google Scholar
Loeblich, A. R. Jr., & Loeblich, A. R. III, 1966. Index to the Genera, Subgenera and Sections of the Pyrrhophyta. Stud. trop. Oceanogr. Miami, No. 3, pp. 1–94.Google Scholar
Loeblich, A. R. Jr., & Tappan, H., 1966. Annotated index and bibliography of the calcareous nannoplankton. Phycologia, Vol. 5, pp. 81–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loeblich, A. R. III, 1965. Dinoflagellate nomenclature. Taxon, Vol. 14, pp. 15–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loeblich, A. R. III, 1967. Notes on the divisions Chlorophyta, Chrysophyta, Pyrrhophyta and Xanthophyta and the family Paramastigaceae. Taxon, Vol. 16, pp. 230–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loiseaux, S., 1967a. Morphologie et cytologie des Myrionemacées. Criteres taxonomiques. Revue gén. Bot., T. 74, pp. 329–47.Google Scholar
Loiseaux, S., 1967b. Recherches sur les cycles de développement des Myrionematacées (Pheophycées) I–II Hécatonématées et Myrionematees. Revue gén. Bot., T, 74, pp. 529–76.Google Scholar
Loiseaux, S., 1968. Recherches sur les cycles de développement des Myrionematacées (Pheophycées) III. Tribu des Ralfsiees IV. Conclusions generates. Revue gén. Bot., T. 75, pp. 295–318.Google Scholar
Lucas, I. A. N., 1967. Two new marine species of Paraphysomonas. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 47, pp. 329–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, I. A. N., 1968. A new member of the Chrysophyceae bearing polymorphic scales. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 48, pp. 437–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lund, J. W. G., 1960. Concerning Calycomonas Lohmann and Codonomonas Van Goor. Nova Hedwigia, Bd. 1, pp. 423–9.Google Scholar
Lund, S., 1959. The Marine Algae of East Greenland. I. Taxonomical Vaxt. Meddr Grønland, Bd. 156, No. 1, pp. 1–248.Google Scholar
Lund, S., 1966. On a sporangia-bearing microthallus of Scytosiphon lomentaria in nature. Phycologia, Vol. 6, pp. 67–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magne, F., 1954. Les Chrysophycées marines de la Station Biologique de Roscoff. Revue gén. Bot., T. 61, pp. 389–416.Google Scholar
Manton, I., 1968. Observations on the microanatomy of the type species of Pyramimonas (P. tetrarhynchus Schmarda). Proc. Linn. Soc. Lond., Vol. 179, pp. 147–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manton, I. & Harris, K., 1966. Observations on the microanatomy of the brown flagellate Sphaleromantis tetragona Skuja with special reference to the flagellar apparatus and scales. J. Linn. Soc, (Bot.), Vol. 59, pp. 397–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manton, I. & Leedale, G. F., 1963. Observations on the micro-anatomy of Crystallolithus hyalinus Gaarder and Markali. Arch. Mikrobiol., Bd. 47, pp. 115–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manton, I., Oates, K. & Parke, M., 1963. Observations on the fine structure of the Pyramimonas stage of Halosphaera and preliminary observations on three species of Pyramimonas. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 43, pp. 225–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manton, I. & Parke, M., 1960. Further observations on small green flagellates with special reference to possible relatives of Chromulina pusilla Butcher. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 39, pp. 275–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manton, I. & Parke, M., 1962. Preliminary observations on scales and their mode of origin in Chrysochromulina polylepis sp. nov. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 42, pp. 565–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manton, I. & Parke, M., 1965. Observations on the fine structure of two species of Platymonas with special reference to flagellar scales and the mode of origin of the theca. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 45, pp. 743–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matzenauer, L., 1933. Die Dinoflagellaten des Indischen Ozeans. Bot. Arch., Vol. 35, pp. 437–510.Google Scholar
Murray, G. & Whitting, F. G., 1899. New Peridiniaceae from the Atlantic. Trans. Linn. Soc. Lond. (Bot.), S´er. 2, Vol. 5, pp. 321–42.Google Scholar
Nakamura, Y., 1965. Development of zoospores in Ralfsia-like thallus, with special reference to the life cycle of the Scytosiphonales. Bot. Mag., Tokyo, Vol. 78, pp. 109—110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naylor, M., 1958. Observations on the taxonomy of the genus Stictyosiphon Kütz. Revue algol., N.S., T. 4, pp. 7–24.Google Scholar
Newroth, P. R. & Taylor, A. R. A., 1968. The distribution of Ceratocolax hartzii. Br. phycol. Bull, Vol. 3, pp. 543–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, L., 1931. A Handbook of the British Seaweeds, xiii + 478 pp. London.Google Scholar
Nordli, O., 1951. Dinoflagellates from Lofoten. Nytt Mag. Bot., Bd. 88, pp. 49–55.Google Scholar
Norris, R. E., 1965. Neustonic marine Craspedomonadales (Choanoflagellates) from Washington and California. J. Protozool., Vol. 12, pp. 589–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papenfuss, G. F., 1960. On the genera of the Ulvales and the status of the order. J. Linn. Soc. (Bot.), Vol. 56, pp. 303–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papenfuss, G. F., 1962. On the circumscription of the green algal genera Ulvella and Pilinia. Phykos, Vol. 1, pp. 6–12.Google Scholar
Papenfuss, G. F., 1966. A review of the present system of classification of the Florideophycidae. Phycologia, Vol. 5, pp. 247–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papenfuss, G. F., 1967. Notes on algal nomenclature. V. Various Chlorophyceae and Rhodophyceae. Phykos, Vol. 5, pp. 95–105.Google Scholar
Parke, M., 1953. A preliminary check-list of British marine algae. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 32, pp. 497–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parke, M., 1956. A preliminary check-list of British marine algae. Corrections and additions 1953–1955. Phycol. Bull., Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 26–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parke, M., 1957. A preliminary check-list of British marine algae. Corrections and additions. II. Phycol. Bull., Vol. 1, No. 5, pp. 36–7.Google Scholar
Parke, M., 1959. A preliminary check-list of British marine algae. Corrections and additions. III. Br. phycol. Bull., Vol. 1, No. 7, pp. 74–8.Google Scholar
Parke, M., 1961a. Some remarks concerning the class Chrysophyceae. Br. phycol. Bull., Vol. 2, PP. 47–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parke, M., 1961b. Electron microscope observations on scale-bearing Chrysophyceae. Recent Advances in Botany, Section 3, pp. 226–9. University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Parke, M., 1961c. Stages in life-histories of coccolithophorids. Rep. Challenger Soc, 3, No. XIII, p. 30.Google Scholar
Parke, M., 1966. The genus Pachysphaera (Prasinophyceae). In Some Contemporary Studies in Marine Science, pp. 555–63. Ed. H., Barnes. London.Google Scholar
Parke, M. & Adams, I., 1960. The motile (Crystallolithus hyalinus Gaarder & Markali) and non-motile phases in the life history of Coccolithus pelagicus (Wallich) Schiller. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 39, pp. 263–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parke, M. & Adams, I., 1961. The Pyramimonas-like motile stage of Halosphaera viridis Schmitz. Bull. Res. Coun. Israel, Vol. 10 D, pp. 94–100.Google Scholar
Parke, M. & Ballantine, D., 1957. A new marine dinoflagellate:Exuviaella mariaelebouriae n. sp. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 36, pp. 643–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parke, M. & Dixon, P. S., 1964. A revised check-list of British marine algae. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 44, pp. 499–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parke, M. & Hartog-Adams, I. Den, 1965. Three species of Halosphaera. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 45, pp. 537–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parke, M., Lund, J. W. G. & Manton, I., 1962. Observations on the biology and fine structure of the type species of Chrysochromulina (C. parva Lackey) in the English Lake District. Arch. Mikrobiol., Bd. 42, pp. 333–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parke, M. & Manton, I., 1962. Studies on marine flagellates. VI. Chrysochromulina pringsheimii sp. nov. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 42, pp. 391–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parke, M. & Manton, I., 1965. Preliminary observations on the fine structure of Prasinocladus marinus. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 45, pp. 525–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parke, M. & Manton, I., 1967. The specific identity of the algal symbiont in Convoluta roscoffensis. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 47, pp. 445–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parke, M. & Rayns, D. G., 1964. Studies on marine flagellates. VII. Nephroselmis gilva sp. nov. and some allied forms. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 44, pp. 209–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paulsen, O., ed. Grøntved, J., 1949. Observations on Dinoflagellates. Biol. Skr., Bd. 6, No. 4, pp. 1–67.Google Scholar
Powell, H. T., 1956. List of marine algae collected at St Bees Head, Cumberland … Phycol. Bull., Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 18–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, H. T., 1963. Speciation in the genus Fucus L. and related genera. In Speciation in the Sea. Ed. Harding, J. P. & Tebble, N., System. Ass. Publ., No. 5, pp. 63–77.Google Scholar
Powell, H. T. & Powell, H. G., 1957. Myxophyceae. In List of marine algae collected in the district around Dale Fort … Phycol. Bull., Vol. i, No. 5, pp. 30–1.Google Scholar
Pringsheim, E. G., 1953. Salzwasser-Eugleninen. Arch. Mikrobiol., Bd. 18, pp. 149–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pringsheim, E. G., 1955. Kleine Mitteilungen über Flagellaten und Algén. Arch. Mikrobiol., Bd. 21, pp. 401–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pringsheim, E. G., 1956. Contributions towards a monograph of the genus Euglena. Nova Ada Acad. Caesar. Leop. Carol., N.F., Bd. 18, No. 125, pp. 1–168.Google Scholar
Proschkina-Lavrenko, A. I., 1945. Algae nonnullae novae. I. Bot. Mater. Gerb., hot. Inst. V. A. Komarova, Sect. Cryptogamica, T. 5, pp. 142–54.Google Scholar
Provasoli, L., Yamasu, T. & Manton, I., 1968. Experiments on the resynthesis of symbiosis in Convoluta roscoffensis with different flagellate cultures. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 48, pp. 465–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prud'homme Van, Reine W. F. & Hoek, C. Van Den, 1966. Cultural evidence for the morphological plasticity of Entophysalis deusta (Meneghini) Drouet and Daily (Chroococcales, Cyanophyceae). Blumea, Vol. 14, pp. 277–83.Google Scholar
Rayns, D. G., 1962. Alternation of generations in a coccolithophorid Cricosphaera carterae (Braarud et Fagerl.) Braarud. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 42, pp. 481–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinsch, P. F., 1875. Contributiones ad Algologiam et Fungologiam, Vol. 1, xii + 104 pp. Lipsiae.Google Scholar
Roberts, M., 1967. Studies on marine algae of the British Isles. 3. The genus Cystoseira. Br. phycol. Bull., Vol. 3, pp. 345–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, M., 1968. Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus Cystoseira C. Ag. J. Linn. Soc. (Bot), Vol. 60, pp. 251–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, R., 1961. The type species of Bifurcaria Stackhouse—a correction. J. Linn. Soc. (Bot.), Vol. 56, p. 512.Google Scholar
Russell, G., 1964a. Laminariocolax tomentosoides on the Isle of Man. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 44, pp. 601–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, G., 1964b. Systematic position of Pilayella littoralis and status of the order Dictyosiphonales. Br. phycol. Bull., Vol. 2, pp. 322–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, G., 1966. The genus Ectocarpus in Britain. I. The attached forms. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 46, pp. 267–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, G., 1967a. The genus Ectocarpus in Britain. II. The free-living forms. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 47, pp. 233–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, G., 1967b. The ecology of some free living Ectocarpaceae. Helgoländer wiss. Meeresunters., Bd. 15, pp. 155–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiller, J., 1925. Die planktonischen Vegetationen des adriatischen Meeres. B. Chrysomonadina, Heterokontae, Cryptomonadina, Eugleninae, Volvocales. I. Systematischer Teil. Arch. Protistenk., Bd. 53, pp. 59–123.Google Scholar
Schiller, J., 1937. Dinoflagellatae (Peridineae). In Rabenhorst, L., Kryptogamen-Flora von Deutschland, Osterreich und der Schweiz, Bd. 10, Abt. 3, Teil 2, vii + 589 pp. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Schiller, J., 1955. Untersuchungen an den planktischen Protophyten des Neusiedlersees. 1950–1954, 1. Teil. (Burgenland. Landesmuseum, Eisenstadt, 1955, pp. 1–66.) Wiss. Arb. Burgenld, Heft 9, pp. 1–66.Google Scholar
Schilling, A. J., 1891. Untersuchungen über die Thierische Lebensweise einiger Peridineen. Ber. dt. bot. Ges., Bd. 9, pp. 199–208.Google Scholar
Schotter, G., 1968. Recherches sur les Phyllophoracées. Notes posthumes publiées par Jean Feldmann et Marie France Magne. Bull. Inst. oceanogr. Monaco, Vol. 67, Nr. 1383, pp. 1–99.Google Scholar
Schutt, F., 1895. Die Peridineen der Plankton-Expedition. Ergebn. Atlant. Ozean Planktonexped. Humboldt-Stift., Bd. 4, M.a.A., pp. 1–170.Google Scholar
Silva, P. C, 1955. The dichotomous species of Codium in Britain. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 34, pp. 565–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva, P. C., 1957a. Remarks on algal nomenclature. Taxon, Vol. 6, pp. 141–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva, P. C, 1957b. Notes on Pacific marine algae. Madrono, Vol. 14, pp. 41–51.Google Scholar
Silva, P. C, 1959. Remarks on algal nomenclature. II. Taxon, Vol. 8, pp. 60–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva, P. C. & Irvine, D. E. G., 1960. Codium amphibium: a species of doubtful validity. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 39, pp. 631–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sjöstedt, L. G., 1939. Enteromorphastudien. I. Svensk bot. Tidskr., Bd. 33, pp. 17–62.Google Scholar
Soderström, J., 1963. Studies in Cladophora. Botanica gothoburg., Vol. I, pp. 1–147.Google Scholar
Solum, I., 1962. The taxonomy of the Dinophysis populations in Norwegian waters in view of biometric observations. Nytt Mag. Bot., Vol. 10, pp. 5–33.Google Scholar
Soma, S., 1960. Chlorophyll in Vaucheria as a clue for the determination of its phylogenetic position. J. Fac. Sci. Tokyo Univ., Bot., Vol. 7, pp. 535–42.Google Scholar
Sournia, A., 1966. Sur la variabilité infraspecifique du genre Ceratium (Peridinien planctonique) en milieu marin. C. r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci., Paris, T. 263, S´er. D, pp. 1980–1983.Google Scholar
Sournia, A., 1968. Le genre Ceratium (Peridinien planctonique) dans le canal de Mozambique. Contribution a une revision mondiale. Vie Milieu, T. 18, pp. 375–499.Google Scholar
Sprengel, C., 1827. Caroli Linnaei … Systema vegetabilium, Ed. 16, Vol. 4, Part 1. 592 pp. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Starmach, K., 1959. Homeothrix janthina (Born, et Flah.) comb, nova mini (Amphithrix janthina Born, et Flah.) oraz sinice towarzyszace. Acta hydrobiol., Kraków, Vol. 1, pp. 149–64.Google Scholar
Von, Stein F. R., 1883. Der Organismus der Infusionthiere, Abt. III, Halfte II, Arthrodelen Flagellaten. 30 pp. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Stewart, W. D. P., 1960. Marine blue-green algae from the island of Barra (Outer Hebrides). Br. phycol. Bull., Vol. 2, pp. 26–7.Google Scholar
H. A. Von, Stosch, 1955. Ein morphologischer Phasenwechsel bei einer Coccolithophoride. Naturwissenschaften, Jg. 42, p. 423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
H. A. Von, Stosch, 1958. Der Geisselapparat einer Coccolithophoride. Naturwissenschaften, Jg. 45, pp. 140–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundene, O., 1964. The conspecificity of Antithamnion sarniense and A. spirographidis in view of culture experiments. Nytt Mag. Bot., Vol. 12, pp. 35–42.Google Scholar
Swale, E. M. F. & Belcher, J. H., 1968. The external morphology of the type species of Pyramimonas (P. tetrarhynchus Schmarda) by electron microscopy. Proc. Linn. Soc. Lond., Vol. 179, pp. 77–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tatewaki, M., 1962. The life-cycle of Monostroma fuscum var. splendens Rosenv. and M. oxyspermum Doty. Am. J. Bot., Vol. 49, p. 673.Google Scholar
Tatewaki, M., 1963. The life history of Monostroma fuscum var. splendens. Bot. Mag., Tokyo, Vol. 76, pp. 381–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, A. R. A., 1962. The type species of Polysiphonia Greville. Taxon, Vol. 11, p. 229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, W. R., 1937. Notes on North Atlantic marine algae. I. Pap. Mich. Acad. Sci., Vol. 22, pp. 225–233.Google Scholar
Umezaki, I., 1958. Revision of Brachytrichia Zanard. and Kyrtuthrix Erceg. Mem. Coll. Agric. Kyoto, Fish. Ser., Special No., pp. 55–67.Google Scholar
Valkanov, A., 1962. Ueber die Entwicklung von Hymenomonas coccolithophora Conrad. Revue algol., N.S., T. 6, pp. 220–6.Google Scholar
Wall, D., 1962. Evidence from recent plankton regarding the biological affinities of Tasmanites Newton 1875 and Leiosphaeridia Eisenack 1958. Geol. Mag., Vol. 99, pp. 353–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wall, D., 1965a. Microplankton, pollen and spores from the Lower Jurassic in Britain. Micropaleontology, Vol. 11, pp. 151–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wall, D., 1965b. Modern hystrichospheres and dinoflagellate cysts from the Woods Hole region. Grana palynol., Vol. 6, pp. 297–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wall, D., Guillard, R. R. L. & Dale, B., 1967. Marine dinoflagellate cultures from resting spores. Phycologia, Vol. 6, pp. 83–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, E. B. & Boney, A. D., 1967. Acrochaetium infestans Howe et Hoyt. Br. phycol. Bull., Vol. 3, p. 343.Google Scholar
Womersley, H. B. S., 1956. A critical survey of the marine algae of southern Australia. Aust. J. mar. freshzaat. Res., Vol. 7, pp. 343–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Womersley, H. B. S., 1965. The Helminthocladiaceae (Rhodophyta) of southern Australia. Aust. J. Bot., Vol. 13, pp. 451–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wynne, M. J., 1966. The sporophyte of certain Scytosiphonaceae. J. Phycol., Vol. 2, Suppl., p. 5 (Abstract).Google Scholar
Yamada, Y. & Tatewaki, M., 1965. New findings on the life history of Monostroma zostericola Tilden. Scient. Pap. Inst. algol. Res. Hokkaido Univ., Vol. 5, pp. 105–18.Google Scholar
Yoshida, K., 1964. On the development of the sporelings oi Monostroma pulchrum Farlow. Bull. Jap. Soc. Phycol., Vol. 12, pp. 8–14.Google Scholar