Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-jkvpf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-18T23:24:21.410Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies in situ of the primary production of an area of inshore antarctic sea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

A. J. Horne ,
G. E. Fogg  and
D. J. Eagle
A. J. Horne*
Affiliation:
Department of Botany, Westfield College, London, N.W.3
G. E. Fogg
Affiliation:
Department of Botany, Westfield College, London, N.W.3
D. J. Eagle
Affiliation:
Department of Botany, Westfield College, London, N.W.3
*
Present address: Department of Biological Sciences, University of Dundee.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The primary productivity of an area of inshore sea in the South Orkney Islands was measured using in situ techniques in two consecutive seasons. Liberation of extracellular products of photosynthesis occurred, accounting for about 1 % of the total carbon fixed at the depth of maximum photosynthesis but rising to 38 % or more when photosynthesis was inhibited at high light intensities.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 49 , Issue 2 , May 1969 , pp. 393 - 405
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bunt, J. S., 1964. Primary productivity under sea ice in Antarctic waters. I. Concentrations and photosynthetic activities of microalgae in the waters of McMurdo Sound, Antarctica. Antarct. Res. Ser., Vol. 1, pp. 13–26.Google Scholar
Burkholder, P. R. & Mandelli, E. F., 1965. Productivity of microalgae in Antarctic sea ice. Science, N.Y., Vol. 149, pp. 872–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doty, M. S. & Oguri, M., 1959. The carbon-fourteen technique for determining primary plankton productivity. Pubbl. Staz. zool. Napoli, Vol. 31, pp. 70–94.Google Scholar
Doty, M. S., Jitts, H. R., Koblentz-Mishke, O. J. & Saijo, Y., 1965. Intercalibration of marine primary productivity techniques. Limnol. Oceanogr., Vol. 10, pp. 282–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El-Sayed, S. Z., 1968. On the productivity of the southwest Atlantic Ocean and the waters west of the Antarctic Peninsula. Antarct. Res. Ser., Vol. 11, pp. 15–47.Google Scholar
El-Sayed, S. Z., Mandelli, E. F. & Sugimura, Y., 1964. Primary organic production in the Drake Passage and Bransfield Strait. Antarct. Res. Ser., Vol.1, pp. 1–11.Google Scholar
El-Sayed, S. Z. & Mandelli, E. F., 1965. Primary production and standing crop in the Weddell Sea and Drake Passage. Antarct. Res. Ser., Vol. 5, pp. 87–106.Google Scholar
Fogg, G. E., 1965. Algal Cultures and Phytoplankton Ecology. University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Fogg, G. E. & Horne, A. J., 1969. Algal physiology. In Symposium on Antarctic Ecology. London: Academic Press (In the press).Google Scholar
Fogg, G. E., Nalewajko, C. & Watt, W. D., 1965. Extracellular products of phyto-plankton photosynthesis. Proc. R. Soc. B, Vol. 162, pp. 517–34.Google Scholar
Goldman, C. R., Mason, D. T. & Wood, B. J. B., 1963. Light injury and inhibition in Antarctic freshwater phytoplankton. Limnol. Oceanogr., Vol. 8, pp. 313–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jitts, H. R., 1967. Productivity.C.S.I.R.O. Division of Fisheries and Oceanography, Ann. Rep. 1966–67, p. 36.Google Scholar
Klyashtorin, L. G., 1961. Primary production in the Atlantic and Southern Oceans according to the data obtained during the fifth Antarctic voyage of the diesel-electric Ob. Dokl. Akad. Nauk. S.S.S.R., Vol. 141, pp. 1204–7.Google Scholar
Mandelli, E. F. & Burkholder, P. R., 1966. Primary productivity in the Gerlache and Bransfield Straits of Antarctica. J. mar. Res., Vol. 24, pp. 5–27.Google Scholar
Ryther, J. H., 1963. Geographic variations in productivity. In The Sea. Vol. 2, pp. 347–80. Ed. Hill, M. N.. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Saijo, Y. & Kawashima, T., 1964. Primary production in the Antarctic Ocean. J. oceanogr. Soc. Japan, Vol. 19, pp. 22–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scor/Unesco Working Group 17, 1966. The Determination of Photosynthetic Pigments in Sea Water. Paris: United Nations.Google Scholar
Steemann, Nielsen E., 1952. The use of radioactive carbon (14C) for measuring organic production in the sea. J. Cons. int. Explor. Mer, Vol. 18, pp. 117–40.Google Scholar
Strickland, J. D. H. & Parsons, T. R., 1965. A Manual of Sea Water Analysis. Bulletin No. 125 (2nd edition, revised). Fisheries Research Board of Canada.Google Scholar
Watt, W. D., 1965. A convenient apparatus for 'in situ' primary production studies. Limnol. Oceanogr., Vol. 10, pp. 298–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watt, W. D., 1966. Release of dissolved organic material from the cells of phyto-plankton populations. Proc. R. Soc. B, Vol. 164, pp. 521–51.Google Scholar
Yentsch, C. S., 1963. Primary production. Oceanogr. & mar. Biol. Vol. 1, pp. 157–75.Google Scholar