Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-rxvq6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-18T10:46:44.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prescribed burning for control of yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis) and enhanced native plant diversity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Joseph M. DiTomaso ,
Guy B. Kyser  and
Marla S. Hastings
Guy B. Kyser
Affiliation:
Weed Science Program, Department of Vegetable Crops, University of California, Davis, CA 95616
Marla S. Hastings
Affiliation:
State of California Department of Parks and Recreation, Sonoma, CA 95476
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Two separate open grassland areas within Sugarloaf Ridge State Park, Sonoma County, CA, were burned for three consecutive years (1993–1995 [Site A] and 1995–1997 [Site B]) for control of yellow starthistle. Burns were conducted in late June to early July following seed dispersal and senescence of desirable grasses and forbs but prior to viable seed production in yellow starthistle. After the first year burn, there was no significant reduction in yellow starthistle cover the following spring and summer. Despite the lack of control, the first year burn reduced the yellow starthistle soil seedbank by 74% and the number of seedlings the following spring by 83%. However, total plant diversity and species richness increased dramatically in the burned areas. This was due primarily to an increase in the number of native broadleaf species. A second burn the next summer (1995–1997 site) reduced seedbank, seedling density, and summer vegetative cover the following year by 94, 92, and 85%, respectively, while maintaining significantly higher native plant cover and richness. A third consecutive summer burn decreased yellow starthistle seedbank and seedling density by 96, 98, and 85%, respectively, in the 1995–1997 burn site. Three consecutive years of burning in the 1993–1995 site reduced yellow starthistle seedbank and seedling density by over 99% and summer vegetative cover by 91%. These results indicate that prescribed burning can be an effective tool for the management of yellow starthistle and can have a long-term benefit on native broadleaf diversity and richness.

Keywords

Yellow starthistle, Centaurea solstitialis L. CENSO.Plant diversity, rangeland, grassland, fire, CENSO

Information

Type
Weed Management
Information
Weed Science , Volume 47 , Issue 2 , April 1999 , pp. 233 - 242
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

Benefield, C. B. 1998. Reproductive biology and mowing control of yellow starthistle. M.Sc. thesis. University of California, Davis, CA. 63 p.Google Scholar
Buongiorno, J., Dahir, S., Lu, H. C., and Lin, C. R., 1994. Tree size diversity and economic returns in uneven-aged forest stands. For. Sci. 40: 83–103.Google Scholar
Callihan, R. H., Prather, T. S., and Northam, F. E. 1993. Longevity of yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis) achenes in soil. Weed Technol. 7: 33–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, D. S. and Peck, S. B. 1992. Diversity and seasonality of leiodid beetles (Coleoptera: Leiodidae) in an old-growth and a 40-year-old forest in New Hampshire. Environ. Entomol. 21: 1283–1293.Google Scholar
DiTomaso, J. M., Lanini, W. T., Thomsen, C. D., Prather, T. S., Turner, C. E., Smith, M. J., Elmore, C. L., Vayssieres, M. P., and Williams, W. A. 1998. Yellow Starthistle. Oakland, CA: University of California DANR Pest Notes, No. 3. 4 p.Google Scholar
Evans, R. A. 1960. Differential responses of three species of the annual grassland type to plant competition and mineral nutrition. Ecology 41: 305–31.Google Scholar
Finney, M. A. and Martin, R. E. 1992. Short fire intervals recorded by redwoods at Annadel State Park, California. Madroño 39: 251–262.Google Scholar
Fossum, H. C. 1990. Effects of prescribed burning and grazing on Stipa pulchra (Hitchc.) seedling emergence and survival. M.Sc. thesis. Davis, CA: University of California. 67 p.Google Scholar
Gerlach, J. D. Jr. 1997. The introduction, dynamics of geographic range expansion, and ecosystem effects of yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis). Proc. Calif. Weed Sci. Soc. 49: 136–141.Google Scholar
Hassan, M. A. and West, N. E. 1986. Dynamics of soil seed pools in burned and unburned sagebrush semi-deserts. Ecology 67: 269–273.Google Scholar
Hastings, M. and DiTomaso, J. M. 1996a. The use of fire for yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis) management and the restoration of native grasslands at Sugarloaf Ridge State Park. Proc. Calif. Weed Sci. Soc. 48: 114–119.Google Scholar
Hastings, M. and DiTomaso, J. M. 1996b. Fire controls yellow starthistle in California grasslands. Restor. Manage. Notes. 14: 124–128.Google Scholar
Hatch, D. A., Bartolome, J. W., and Hillyard, D. S. 1991. Testing a management strategy for restoration of California's native grasslands. Pages 343–349 in Proceedings of the Symposium on Natural Areas and Yosemite: Prospects for the Future. Denver, CO: U.S. National Park Service.Google Scholar
Heady, H. F. and Child, R. D. 1994. Rangeland Ecology and Management. San Francisco, CA: Westview Press. 519 p.Google Scholar
Johnson, K. H., Olson, R. A., and Whitson, T. D. 1996. Composition and diversity of plant and small mammal communities in tebuthiurontreated big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata). Weed Technol. 10, 404–416.Google Scholar
Joley, D. B., Maddox, D. M., Supkoff, D. M., and Mayfield, A. 1992. Dynamics of yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis) achenes in the field and laboratory. Weed Sci. 40: 190–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingsbury, J. M. 1964. Poisonous Plants of the United States and Canada. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 626 p.Google Scholar
Knapp, A. K. and Seastedt, T. R. 1986. Detritus accumulation limits productivity of tallgrass prairie. BioScience 36: 662–668.Google Scholar
Kruger, F. J. 1983. Plant community diversity and dynamics in relation to fire. Ecol. Studies 43: 446–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddox, D. M. 1981. Introduction, Phenology, and Density of Yellow Starthistle in Coastal, Intercoastal, and Central Valley Situations in California. USDA Agricultural Research Service ARR-W-20.Google Scholar
Maddox, D. M. and Mayfield, A. 1985. Yellow starthistle infestations on the increase. Calif. Ag. 39(6): 10–12.Google Scholar
Magurran, A. E. 1988. Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press. 179 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayeux, H. S. and Hamilton, W. T. 1988. Response of false broomweed and associated herbaceous species to fire. J. Range Manage. 41: 2–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCune, B., and Mefford, M. J. 1995. PC-ORD. Multivariate analysis of ecological data, version 2.0. Gleneden Beach, OR: MjM Software Design.Google Scholar
Mielke, P. W., Berry, K. J., Brockwell, P. J., and Williams, J. S. 1981. A class of nonparametric techniques based on multiresponse permutation procedures. Biometrika 68: 720–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasmussen, G. A. 1994. Prescribed burning considerations in sagebrush annual grassland communities. Pages 69–70 in Proceeding, Ecology and Management of Annual Rangelands. Ogden, UT: USDA Forestry Service and Intermountain Research Station General Technical Rep. INT-GTR-313.Google Scholar
Roché, B. F. Jr., and Roché, C. T. 1991. Identification, introduction, distribution, ecology, and economics of Centaurea species. Pages 274–291 in James, L. F., Evans, J. O., Ralphs, M. H., and Child, R. D., eds. Noxious Range Weeds. San Francisco: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Sheley, R. L. and Larson, L. L. 1994. Comparative growth and interference between cheatgrass and yellow starthistle seedlings. J. Range Manage. 47: 470–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuart, J. D., Grifantini, M. C., and Fox, L. III. 1993. Early successional pathways following wildfire and subsequent silvicultural treatment in Douglas fir/hardwood forest, NW California. Forest Sci. 39: 561–572.Google Scholar
Thomsen, C. D., Williams, W. A., Vayssieres, M. P., Turner, C. E., and Lanini, W. T. 1996. Yellow Starthistle Biology and Control. Oakland, CA: University of California DANR Publ. 21541. 19 p.Google Scholar
Tilman, D. 1987. Secondary succession and the pattern of plant dominance along experimental nitrogen gradients. Ecol. Monogr. 57: 189–214.Google Scholar
Vogl, R. J. 1974. Effects of fire on grasslands. Pages 139–144 in Kozlowski, T. T. and Ahlgren, C. E., eds. Fire and Ecosystems. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
West, N. E. 1991. Junipers of the western U.S.: classification, distribution, ecology, and control. Pages 325–333 in James, L. F., Evans, J. O., Ralphs, M. H., and Child, R. D., eds. Noxious Range Weeds. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Wiles, L. J., Barlin, D. H., Schweizer, E. E., Duke, H. R., and Whitt, D. E. 1996. A new soil sampler and elutriator for collecting and extracting weed seeds from soil. Weed Technol. 10: 35–41.Google Scholar