Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-ntvhh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-14T22:26:09.564Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“She thinks you’re kawaii”: Socializing affect, gender, and relationships in a Japanese preschool

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 January 2010

MATTHEW BURDELSKI  and
KOJI MITSUHASHI
MATTHEW BURDELSKI
Affiliation:
Department of Modern Languages and Literatures, Swarthmore College, 500 College Avenue, Swarthmore, PA 19081-1390, mburdel1@swarthmore.edu
KOJI MITSUHASHI
Affiliation:
Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Hoshi University, 2-4-41 Ebara, Shinagawa, Tokyo 142-8501, Japan, koji_mitsuhashi@s3.dion.ne.jp
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Kawaii, an adjective meaning ‘cute’, ‘adorable’, and ‘lovable’, is an important aspect of Japanese material culture and a key affect word used to describe things that are small, delicate, and immature. While “cuteness” has been widely discussed in relation to Japanese society and psychology and the globalization of Japanese culture, there has been little analysis of the word kawaii in interaction. This article explores the use of kawaii in interaction in a Japanese preschool. In particular, it analyzes ways teachers use multimodal resources, including talk, embodied actions, material objects, and participation frameworks, in making assessments of things in the social world and in “glossing” children’s actions as thoughts and feelings, and it examines children’s emerging use of kawaii with teachers and peers. The findings shed light on ways everyday communicative practices shape children’s understandings and use of language in relation to affect, gender, and relationships in preschool.*

Keywords

Kawaiilanguage socializationaffectgenderpreschoolJapan

Information

Type
Research Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , February 2010 , pp. 65 - 93
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Akatsuka, Noriko (1991). Affect and Japanese conditional. In Clancy, Patricia & Thompson, Sandra (eds.), Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics, Vol. 3: Asian discourse and grammar, 1–8. Santa Barbara: Department of Linguistics, University of California Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
Allison, Anne (2006). Cuteness as Japan’s millennial product. In Tobin, Joseph (ed.), Pikachu’s global adventure: The rise and fall of Pokémon, 34–49. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, Fred (1995). Classroom discourse and language socialization in a Japanese elementary school setting: An ethnographic-linguistic study. Dissertation, University of Hawaii, Manoa.Google Scholar
Antaki, Charles, & Widdicombe, Sue (1998). Identities in interaction. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Asano, Chie (1996). Onna wa naze yaseyoo to suru no ka: Sesshoku shoogai to gendaa [Why do women try to lose weight?: Eating disorders and gender]. Tokyo: Keiso.Google Scholar
Ben-Ari, Eyal (1997). Body projects in Japanese childcare: Culture, organization and emotions in a preschool. London: Curzon.Google Scholar
Besnier, Niko (1990). Language and affect. Annual Review of Anthropology 19:419–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besnier, Niko (1993). Reported speech and affect on Nukulaelae atoll. In Hill, Jane H. & Irvine, Judith T. (eds.), Responsibility and evidence in oral discourse, 161–81. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, & Levinson, Steven C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Judith (1989). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Clancy, Patricia M. (1986). The acquisition of communicative style in Japanese. In Schieffelin, Bambi B. & Ochs, Elinor (eds.), Language socialization across cultures, 213–50. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clancy, Patricia M. (1999). The socialization of affect in Japanese mother-child conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 31:1397–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, Haruko M. (1990). The role of the Japanese sentence-final particle no in the socialization of children. Multilingua 9:377–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, Haruko M. (1999). Language socialization in Japanese elementary schools: Attentive listening and reaction turns. Journal of Pragmatics 31:1443–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook-Gumperz, Jenny (2001). Girls’ oppositional stances: The interactional accomplishment of gender in nursery school and family life. In Baron, Bettina & Kotthoff, Helga (eds.), Gender in interaction: Perspectives on femininity and masculinity in ethnography and discourse, 21–49. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Daikuhara, Midori (1986). A study of compliments from a cross-cultural perspective: Japanese vs. American English. Working Papers in Educational Linguistics 2:103–34.Google Scholar
Endo, Toshihiko (2000). Omoiyari no ‘aru nashi’ to wa doo iu koto? [What does it mean to ‘have/not have’ empathy?]. Jidoo Shinri [Child Psychology] 54:743–48.Google Scholar
Funabashi, Kuniko (2004). Jendaa furii no shiten kara kosodate o kangaeru [Considering child-rearing from the perspective of ‘gender free’]. Buraku Kaihoo: Tokushuu Kosodate to Jendaa [Buraku liberation: Special Volume Child-rearing and gender] 535:12–16.Google Scholar
Garrett, Paul B., & Baquedano-López, Patricia (2002). Language socialization: Reproduction and continuity, transformation and change. Annual Review of Anthropology 31:339–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles (2007). Interactive footing. In Holt, Elizabeth & Clift, Rebecca (eds.), Reporting talk: Reported speech in interaction, 16–46. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles,& Goodwin, Marjorie H. (1987). Concurrent operations on talk: Notes on the interactive organization of assessments. IPrA Papers in Pragmatics 1(1):1–52.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles,& Goodwin, Marjorie H.(1992). Assessments and the construction of context. In Duranti, Alessandro & Goodwin, Charles (eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon, 147–90. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie H. (2007). Participation and embodied action in preadolescent girls’ assessment activity. Research on Language and Social Interaction 40:353–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie H, & Charles, (2000). Emotion within situated activity. In Budwig, Nancy, Uzgiris, Ina C., & Wertsch, James V. (eds.), Communication: An arena of development, 33–54. Stamford, CT: Ablex.Google Scholar
Harkness, Sara, & Super, Charles M. (1983). The cultural construction of child development: A framework for the socialization of affect. Ethos 11:221–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haviland, John B. (1989). “Sure, sure”: Evidence and affect. Text 9:27–68.Google Scholar
Hayashi, Makoto (1997). An exploration of sentence-final uses of the quotative particle in Japanese discourse. In Sohn, Ho-min & Haig, John (eds.), Japanese/Korean linguistics vol. 6, 565–81. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Hendry, Joy (1986). Becoming Japanese: The world of the pre-school child. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Herot, Christine (2002). Socialization of affect during mealtime interactions. In Blum-Kulka, Shoshana & Snow, Catherine E. (eds.) Talking to adults: The contribution of multiparty discourse to language acquisition, 155–79. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Holloway, Susan D. (2000). Contested childhood: Diversity and change in Japanese preschools. New York & London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet (1998). Complimenting – a positive politeness strategy. In Coates, Jennifer (ed.), Language and gender: A reader, 100–20. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Holt, Elizabeth, & Clift, Rebecca (eds.) (2007). Reporting talk: Reported speech in interaction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ide, Sachiko (1991). How and why do women speak more politely in Japanese? In Ide, Sachiko & McGloin, Naomi H. (eds.), Aspects of Japanese women’s language, 63–79. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith T. (1990). Registering affect: Heteroglossia in the linguistic expression of emotion. In Lutz, Catherine A. & Abu-Lughod, Lila (eds.), Language and the politics of emotion, 126–85. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Joffe, Carole (1971). Sex role socialization and the nursery school. Journal of Marriage and the Family 33(3):27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keenan, Elinor Ochs (1977). Making it last: Repetition in children’s discourse. In Ervin-Tripp, Susan & Mitchell-Kernan, Claudia (eds.), Child discourse, 125–38. New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinsella, Sharon (1995). Cuties in Japan. In Skov, Lise & Moeran, Brian (eds.), Women, media and consumption in Japan, 220–54. Richmond, VA: Curzon.Google Scholar
Kyratzis, Amy, & Cook-Gumperz, Jenny (2008). Language socialization and gendered practices in childhood. In Duff, Patricia A. & Hornberger, Nancy H. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Language and Education, 8:145–56. 2nd ed.New York: Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
León, Lourdes de (1998). The emergent participant: Interactive patterns in the socialization of Tzotzil (Mayan) infants. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 8:131–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Catherine C. (1995). Educating hearts and minds: Reflections on Japanese preschool and elementary education. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Loveday, Leo (1981). Pitch, politeness, and sexual role: An exploratory investigation into the pitch correlates of English and Japanese politeness formulae. Language and Speech 24:71–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masubuchi, Shoichi (1994). Kawaii shookoogun [Kawaii syndrome]. Tokyo: Japan Broadcast Publishing.Google Scholar
Maynard, Senko K. (1993). Discourse modality, emotion, and voice in the Japanese language. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
McVeigh, Brian (1996). Commodifying affection, authority and gender in the everyday objects of Japan. Journal of Material Culture 1:291–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McVeigh, Brian (2000). How Hello Kitty commodifies the cute, cool, and camp: ‘Consumutopia’ versus ‘control’ in Japan. Journal of Material Culture 5:225–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehan, Hugh (1979). Learning lessons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Laura (2004). You are doing burikko!: Censoring/scrutinizing artificers of cute femininity in Japanese. In Okamoto, Shigeko & Shibamoto Smith, Janet S. (eds.), Japanese language, gender, and ideology: Cultural models and real people, 148–65. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyazaki, Ayumi (2004). Japanese junior high school girls’ and boys’ first-person pronoun use and their social world. In Okamoto, Shigeko & Shibamoto Smith, Janet S. (eds.), Japanese language, gender, and ideology: Cultural models and real people, 256–74. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, Ivan (trans.) (1991). The pillow book of Sei Shônagon. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Nakamura, Keiko (2001). Gender and language use in Japanese preschool children. Research on Language and Social Interaction 34:15–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ochs, Elinor (1992). Indexing gender. In Duranti, Alessandro & Goodwin, Charles (eds.), Rethinking context, 335–58. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor (1993). Constructing social identity: A language socialization perspective. Research on Language and Social Interaction 26:287–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ochs, Elinor (1996). Linguistic resources for socializing humanity. In Gumperz, John J. & Levinson, Steven C. (eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity, 407–37. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor, & Schieffelin, Bambi B. (1984). Language acquisition and socialization: Three developmental stories. In Shweder, Richard A. & LeVine, Robert A. (eds.), Culture theory: Essays on mind, self, and emotion, 276–320. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor, & Schieffelin, Bambi B (1989). Language has a heart. Text 9(1):7–25.Google Scholar
Ohta, Amy S. (1994). Socializing the expression of affect: An overview of affective particle use in the Japanese as a foreign language classroom. Issues in Applied Linguistics 5:303–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohta, Amy S (1999). Interactional routines and the socialization of interactional style in adult learners of Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 31:1493–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okabe, Keizo (1987). Indirect speech acts of the Japanese. In Kincaid, Larry D. (ed.), Communication theory: Eastern and Western perspectives. 127–36. San Diego: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okamoto, Shigeko, & Shibamoto Smith, Janet S. (eds.) (2004). Japanese language, gender, and ideology: Cultural models and real people. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okamoto, Yoriko, 2001. Boshi komyunikeeshon ni okeru hahaoya no daiben: 1saiji e no daiben no jookyoo to hatsuwa keitai no kanten [Mother speaking for the child in mother-child communication: Conditions and utterances to 1 yr. olds]. Boshi Kenkyuu [Mother-child Research] 21:46–55.Google Scholar
Peak, Lois (1991). Learning to go to school in Japan: The transition from home to preschool life. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In Atkinson, John & Heritage, John (eds.), Structures of social action, 57–101. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rabain-Jamin, Jacqueline (1998). Polyadic language socialization strategy: The case of toddlers in Senegal. Discourse Processes 26:43–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, Yoshie Nishioka (2001). The maternal role in Japan: Cultural values and socioeconomic conditions. In Shimizu, Hidetaka & Levine, Robert A. (eds.), Japanese frames of mind: Cultural perspectives on human development, 85–110. Cambridge, UK & New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sakata, Minako (1991). The acquisition of Japanese ‘gender’ particles. Language & Communication 11(3):117–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1996). Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In Ochs, Elinor; Schegloff, Emanuel A.; & Thompson, Sandra A. (eds.), Interaction and Grammar, 52–133. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schieffelin, Bambi B., & Ochs, Elinor (1986). Language socialization. Annual Review of Anthropology 15:163–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scollon, Suzanne (1982). Reality set, socialization and linguistic convergence. Dissertation, University of Hawaii, Honolulu.Google Scholar
Shibamoto, Janet (1985). Japanese women’s language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael (1976). Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description. In Basso, Keith H. & Selby, Henry (eds.), Meaning in anthropology, 11–56. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Strauss, Susan & Kawanishi, Yumiko (1996). Assessment strategies in Japanese, Korean, and American English. In Akatsuka, Noriko, Iwasaki, Shoichi, & Strauss, Susan (eds.), Japanese/Korean Linguistics Vol. 5, 149–65. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Sreetharan, Cindi Sturtz (2004). Japanese men’s linguistic stereotypes and realities. In Okamoto, Shigeko & Shibamoto Smith, Janet S. (eds.), Japanese language, gender, and ideology: Cultural models and real people, 275–89. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suleski, Ronald, & Masada, Hiroko (2000). Affective expressions in Japanese: A handbook of value-laden words in everyday Japanese. Tokyo: Hokuseido.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Ryoko (1999). Language socialization through morphology: The affective suffix –CHAU in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 31:1423–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanaka, Hiroko (2000). The particle ne as a turn-management device in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 32:1135–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanaka, Hiroko (2005). Grammar and the “timing” of social action: Word order and preference organization in Japanese. Language in Society 34:389–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tobin, Joseph J.; Wu, David Y.H.; & Davidson, Dana H. (1989). Preschool in three cultures: Japan, China, and the United States. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Tobin, Joseph J.; Karasawa, Mayumi; & Hsueh, Yeh (2004). Komatsudani then and now: Continuity and change in a Japanese preschool. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood 5(2):128–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomomatsu, Hiroshi (1994). Jidoo no kotoba no jikohyooka: kodomo wa ‘kawaii’ ka? [Child language and self evaluation: Are children kawaii?]. Nihon hoikugakkai taikai happyooronbun shooroku [Proceedings of the Japan childcare conference] 47:90–1.Google Scholar
Ueno, Chizuko (1982). Sekushii gyaru no daikenkyuu: Onna no yomikata, yomarekata, yomasekata [Research on sexy girls: How to read women, how women are read, and how to make them be read]. Tokyo: Kobunsha.Google Scholar
West, Candace, & Zimmerman, Don H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society 1(2): 125–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Merry (1993). The material child: Coming of age in Japan and America. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Yano, Christine R. (2009). Pink globalization: Rethinking Japan’s cute/cool trek across the Pacific. Lecture at the International House of Japan, Tokyo (June 1).Google Scholar
Yomota, Inuhiko (2006). “Kawaii” ron [Theory of “kawaii”]. Tokyo: Chikuma Shinsho.Google Scholar