Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-kl59c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-16T03:07:18.410Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Many important group-level traits are institutions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2014

Matthew R. Zefferman  and
Peter J. Richerson
Matthew R. Zefferman
Affiliation:
Graduate Group in Ecology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616mrz1@nimbios.orghttp://www.zefferman.com
Peter J. Richerson
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616. pjricherson@ucdavis.eduhttp://www.des.ucdavis.edu/faculty/Richerson/Richerson.htm
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Smaldino makes a solid contribution to the literature on the evolution of human social organization by pointing out that group-level-traits (GLTs) often emerge from the interactions of group members in such a way that their effects are not easily partitioned into individual selection. However, we argue that he too readily dismisses institutional analysis as a tool for understanding these traits.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 37 , Issue 3 , June 2014 , pp. 280 - 281
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Boyd, R. & Richerson, P. J. (1990) Group selection among alternative evolutionarily stable strategies. Journal of Theoretical Biology 145:331–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cederman, L. E. & Gleditsch, K. S. (2004) Conquest and regime change: An evolutionary model of the spread of democracy and peace. International Studies Quarterly 48:603–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, E. O. (2002) The spread of Western military models to Ottoman Turkey and Meiji Japan. In: The sources of military change, ed. Farrell, T. & Terriff, T., pp. 41–67. Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Henrich, J. (2004a) Cultural group selection, coevolutionary processes and large-scale cooperation. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 53:3–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, D. C. (1990) Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar