Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-2tv5m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-27T23:24:58.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Age and loneliness in 25 European nations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2011

KEMING YANG
Affiliation:
School of Applied Social Sciences, University of Durham, Durham, UK.
CHRISTINA VICTOR*
Affiliation:
School of Health Sciences and Social Care, Brunel University, Uxbridge, UK.
*
Address for correspondence: Keming Yang, School of Applied Social Sciences, University of Durham, Durham DH1 3HN, UK. E-mail: keming.yang@durham.ac.uk

Abstract

The relationship between age and loneliness is intriguing. While loneliness has been widely perceived as a problem of old age, there is evidence suggesting that adolescence is the peak age for experiencing loneliness and there are demonstrable variations between nations in reported rates of loneliness. However, comparative data for examining both the prevalence of loneliness across age groups and across nations are sparse. As the first phase of a larger project, we explore the prevalence of loneliness across different age groups in 25 European nations, with a focus on people of an advanced age. After discussing issues of comparability, we present our empirical findings employing data collected in the third round (2006–07) of the European Social Survey (total sample size 47,099, age range 15–101) which included a ‘self-rating’ loneliness scale. Our results suggest that the prevalence of loneliness does increase with age for the combined sample. However, the nation in which one lives shows a greater impact than age on reported levels of loneliness, with Russia and Eastern European nations having the highest proportions of lonely people (about 10–34% for different age groups) and Northern European nations the lowest (mostly below 6%). Possible explanatory factors are identified and discussed, which provides the groundwork of a subsequent and formal study.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable