Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-kcxw8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-14T01:53:48.697Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Basic Old-Age Pension and financial wellbeing of older adults in South Korea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2014

EUNHAE SHIN  and
YOUNG KYUNG DO
EUNHAE SHIN
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
YOUNG KYUNG DO*
Affiliation:
Department of Health Policy and Management, Seoul National University College of Medicine, and Institute of Health Policy and Management, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Korea.
*
Address for correspondence: Young Kyung Do, Department of Health Policy and Management, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 103 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 110-799, Korea. E-mail: ykdo89@snu.ac.kr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

South Korea's old-age poverty rate is among the highest in the developed world. Confronted with the increasing demand for a social safety net for older people, the South Korean government introduced the Basic Old-Age Pension (BOAP) in 2008. The BOAP is a non-contributory, means-tested pension covering 70 per cent of the elderly population, with monthly benefits amounting to 84 kW (thousand Korean won, approximately equivalent to US $1) for singles and 139 kW for couples. Little empirical research has been conducted, however, to evaluate the effectiveness of the new pension programme in supporting the financial wellbeing of older people. Using data from the 2008–2010 Korea Welfare Panel Study, a panel data analysis is conducted to estimate the effects of the BOAP on three sets of financial wellbeing measures: financial difficulty, monthly consumption and overall financial satisfaction. The results suggest that the BOAP has beneficial effects on the financial wellbeing of older people by improving affordability of basic subsistence items such as heating and nutritious meals, particularly among the older-old group. However, the effects are limited to these few outcomes only; overall financial wellbeing and other important indicators remain unchanged.

Keywords

non-contributory pensionfinancial wellbeingSouth Koreaold-age poverty

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 35 , Issue 5 , May 2015 , pp. 1055 - 1074
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ahn, S. 2012. Health, welfare, and medical policy of the president-elect Park Geun-hye. Joongang Ilbo. Available online at http://article.joins.com/news/article/article.asp?total_id=10228426&ctg=1202 [Accessed 15 February 2013].Google Scholar
Baetschmann, G. 2012. Identification and estimation of thresholds in the fixed effects ordered logit model. Economics Letters, 115, 3, 416–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrientos, A. 2003. What is the Impact of Non-contributory Pensions on Poverty? Estimates from Brazil and South Africa. Chronic Poverty Research Centre Working Paper No. 33. Available online at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1754420 [Accessed 16 October 2012].Google Scholar
Bertranou, F. and Grushka, C. 2002. The non-contributory pension programme in Argentina: Assessing the impact on poverty reduction. Extension of Social Security (ESS) Paper 5, Social Security Policy and Development Branch, International Labour Organization, Geneva.Google Scholar
Beverly, S. G. 2001. Measures of material hardship. Journal of Poverty, 5, 1, 23–41.Google Scholar
Choi, Y. J. and Kim, J. W. 2010. Contrasting approaches to old-age income protection in Korea and Taiwan. Ageing & Society, 30, 7, 1135–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gassmann, F. and Behrendt, C. 2006. Cash benefits in low-income countries: simulating the effects on poverty reduction for Senegal and Tanzania. Issues in Social Protection Discussion Paper No. 15, International Labour Organization, Geneva.Google Scholar
Giang, T. L. and Pfau, W. D. 2009. An exploration for a universal non-contributory pension scheme in Vietnam. MPRA Paper No. 24947, University Library of Munich, Munich, Germany.Google Scholar
Hausman, J. A. 1978. Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 46, 6, 1251–71.Google Scholar
Jeong, K. H., Lee, Y. K., Choi, H. S., Kim, T. W., Lee, H. J., Lee, S. J., Son, C. G., Kang, S. H., Kwon, H. J. and Lee, E. J. 2009. Socio-economic Impact of the Basic Old-Age Pension System. Korean Ministry of Health and Welfare and Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs, Seoul.Google Scholar
Kakwani, N. and Subbarao, K. 2005. Ageing and Poverty in Africa and the Role of Social Pensions. United Nations Development Programme, International Poverty Centre. Available online at https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/8535 [Accessed 6 November 2012].Google Scholar
Kakwani, N. and Subbarao, K. 2007. Poverty among the elderly in Sub-Saharan Africa and the role of social pensions. Journal of Development Studies, 43, 6, 987–1008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, S. and Choi, O. 2010. The impact of the basic old-age pension scheme on poverty reduction and income guarantee. Korean Social Policy Review, 17, 2, 43–71.Google Scholar
Kim, E. H. W. 2012. Public support improves elders’ life satisfaction despite crowding out of family support: evidence from a new government pension in Korea. Unpublished PhD thesis, Sanford School of Public Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.Google Scholar
Kim, J. W. and Choi, Y. J. 2011. Does family still matter? Public and private transfers in emerging welfare state systems in a comparative perspective. International Journal of Social Welfare, 20, 4, 353–66.Google Scholar
Korea National Statistics Office 2010. Korea Statistical Information System. Available online at http://kosis.kr/ [Accessed 28 February 2013].Google Scholar
Matsaganis, M., Papadopoulos, F. and Tsakloglou, P. 2000. Estimating extreme poverty in Greece and the cost of eliminating it through a minimum income guarantee. Discussion Paper No. 02, Department of International and European Economic Studies, University of Economics and Business, Athens.Google Scholar
McGarry, K. M. 2002. Guaranteed income: SSI and the well-being of the elderly poor. In Feldstein, M. and Liebman, J. B. (eds), The Distributional Aspects of Social Security and Social Security Reform. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 49–84.Google Scholar
McGuire, P. B. and Conroy, J. D. 1998. Effects on microfinance of the 1997–1998 Asian financial crisis. Paper presented at the Second Annual Seminar on New Development Finance, September, Frankfurt, Germany.Google Scholar
Moon, H. 2008. The role of social pensions in Korea. Paper presented at World Bank–MOF–Hitotsubashi Workshop, February, Tokyo.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) 2011. Pensions at a Glance 2011: Retirement-income Systems in OECD and G20 Countries. OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
Palley, H. A. 1992. Social policy and the elderly in South Korea: Confucianism, modernization, and development. Asian Survey, 32, 9, 787–801.Google Scholar
Park, K. S. 2007. Poverty and inequality in later life: cumulated disadvantages from employment to post retirement in South Korea. International Journal of Sociology of the Family, 33, 1, 25–42.Google Scholar
Schwarzer, H. and Querino, A. C. 2002. Non-contributory Pensions in Brazil: The Impact on Poverty Reduction. International Labour Organization, Geneva.Google Scholar
Yang, Y., Williamson, J. B. and Shen, C. 2010. Social security for China's rural aged: a proposal based on a universal non-contributory pension. International Journal of Social Welfare, 19, 2, 236–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar