Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-nf276 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-14T13:14:44.662Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Talking about frailty: health professional perspectives and an ideological dilemma

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 August 2020

Victoria Cluley Open the ORCID record for Victoria Cluley [Opens in a new window] ,
Graham Martin ,
Zoe Radnor  and
Jay Banerjee
Victoria Cluley*
Affiliation:
Cass Business School, City, University of London, London, UK
Graham Martin
Affiliation:
THIS Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
Zoe Radnor
Affiliation:
Cass Business School, City, University of London, London, UK
Jay Banerjee
Affiliation:
University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
*
*Corresponding author. Email: victoria.cluley@city.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Frailty is increasingly used in clinical settings to describe a physiological state resulting from a combination of age-related co-morbidities. Frailty also has a strong ‘lay’ meaning that conjures a particular way of being. Recent studies have reported how frail older people perceive the term frailty, showing that frailty is often an unwanted and resisted label. While there are many scores and measures that clinicians can use to determine frailty, little has been published regarding how health-care professionals use and make sense of the term. This paper reports the findings of a qualitative study that explored how health professionals perceive frailty. Forty situated interviews were conducted with health-care professionals working in an emergency department in the English Midlands. The interview talk was analysed using discourse analysis. The findings show that the health professionals negotiate an ‘ideological dilemma’ – a tension between contradictory sets of meanings and consequences for action – based on their ‘lay’ and clinical experience of the term frailty. It is concluded that this dilemma could have a negative impact on the assessment of frailty depending on the system of assessment used.

Keywords

frailtyhealth professionalsperceptionsideological dilemmadiscourse analysis

Information

Type
Article
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 42 , Issue 1 , January 2022 , pp. 204 - 222
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aijaz, F, Conroy, S, and Banerjee, J (2018) Embedding the clinical frailty scale in the emergency department and its impact on patient care. Age and Ageing 47, iii20–iii23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billig, M, Condor, S, Edwards, D, Gane, M, Middleton, D and Radley, A (1988) Ideological Dilemmas: A Social Psychology of Everyday Thinking. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Bowker, N and Tuffin, K (2002) Disability discourses for online identities. Disability & Society 17, 327–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Britain Thinks (2015) Frailty Language and Perceptions. Age UK. Available at https://www.ageuk.org.uk/documents/en-gb/for-professionals/policy/health-and-wellbeing/report_bgs_frailty_language_and_perceptions.pdf?dtrk=true.Google Scholar
Bujnowska-Fedak, M, Gwyther, H, Szwamel, K, D’Avanzo, B, Holland, C, Shaw, RL and Kurpas, D (2019) A qualitative study examining everyday frailty management strategies adopted by Polish stakeholders. European Journal of General Practice 25, 197–204CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, AJ and Buchner, DM (1997) Unstable disability and the fluctuations of frailty. Age and Ageing 26, 315–318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davies, B and Harre, R (1990) Possitioning: the discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 20, 43–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edley, N (2001) Analysing masculinity: interpretative repertoires, ideological dilemmas, and subject positions. In Wetherell, M, Taylor, S and Yates, SJ (eds), Discourse as Data: A Guide for Analysis. London: Sage, pp. 189–228.Google Scholar
Elliott, A, Phelps, K, Regen, E and Conroy, SP (2017) Identifying frailty in the emergency department – feasibility study. Age and Ageing 46, 840–845.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fried, LP, Tangen, CM, Walston, J, Newman, AB, Hirsch, C, Gottdiener, J, Seeman, T, Tracy, R, Kop, W, Burke, G and McBurnie, MA (2001) Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. Journals of Gerontology: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 56A, M146–M157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gale, N and Sultan, H (2013) Telehealth as ‘peace of mind’: embodiment, emotions and the home as the primary health space for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder. Health & Place 21, 140–147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilbert, T, Neuburger, J, Kraindler, J, Keeble, E, Smith, P, Ariti, C, Arora, S, Street, A, Parker, S, Roberts, HC and Bardsley, M (2018) Development and validation of a Hospital Frailty Risk Score focusing on older people in acute care settings using electronic hospital records: an observational study. The Lancet 391, 1775–1782.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilleard, C and Higgs, P (2013) The fourth age and the concept of a ‘social imaginary’: a theoretical excursus. Journal of Aging Studies 27, 368–376.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grenier, A (2007) Constructions of frailty in the English language, care practice and the lived experience. Ageing & Society 27, 425–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grenier, A and Hanley, J (2007) Older women and ‘frailty’: aged, gendered and embodied resistance, Current Sociology 52, 211–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grenier, A, Lloyd, L and Phillipson, C (2017) Precarity in late life: rethinking dementia as a ‘frailed’ old age. Sociology of Health & Illness 39, 318–330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gwyther, H, Shaw, R, Dauden, EAJ, D’Avanzo, B, Kurpas, D, Bujnowska-Fedak, M, Kujawa, T, Marcucci, M, Cano, A and Holland, C (2018) Understanding frailty: a qualitative study of European healthcare policy-makers’ approaches to frailty screening and management. BMJ Open 8, e018653.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laceulle, H (2017) Virtuous aging and existential vulnerability. Journal of Aging Studies 43, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitchell, A and Banerjee, J (2019) Clinical frailty score as a decision-making tool in the emergency department – a step towards better outcomes for older patients. Emergency Medicine Journal 36, 974–976.Google Scholar
National Health Service (NHS) (2014) Safe Compassionate Care for Frail Older People Using an Integrated Care Pathway. Available at https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/safe-comp-care.pdf.Google Scholar
National Health Service (NHS) (2019 a) The NHS Long Term Plan. Available at https://www.longtermplan.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/nhs-long-term-plan-june-2019.pdf.Google Scholar
National Health Service (NHS) (2019 b) NHS Right to Care: Frailty Toolkit. Available at https://www.england.nhs.uk/rightcare/wp-content/uploads/sites/40/2019/07/frailty-toolkit-june-2019-v1.pdf.Google Scholar
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) (2015) Older People with Social Care Needs and Multiple Long Term Conditions (NG 22). Available at https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng22.Google Scholar
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) (2016) Guidance on Multimorbidity: Clinical Assessment and Management (NG 56). Available at https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng56.Google Scholar
Nicholson, C, Meyer, J, Flatley, M and Holman, C (2013) The experience of living at home with frailty in old age: a psychosocial qualitative study. International Journal of Nursing Studies 50, 1172–1179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nicholson, C, Gordon, AL and Tinker, A (2017) Changing the way ‘we’ view and talk about frailty… Age and Ageing 46, 349–351.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pickard, S (2014) Frail bodies: geriatric medicine and the constitution of the fourth age. Sociology of Health & Illness 36, 549–563.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pickard, S, Cluley, V, Danely, J, Laceulle, H, Leon-Salas, J, Vanhoutte, B and Romero-Ortuno, R (2019) New horizons in frailty: the contingent, the existential, and the clinical. Age and Ageing 48, 466–471.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Potter, J (1996) Discourse analysis and constructionist approaches: theoretical background. In Richardson, JTE (ed.), Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods for Psychology and the Social Sciences. Leicester, UK: BPS Books, pp. 125–140.Google Scholar
Potter, J and Wetherell, M (1987) Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Rahman, S (2019) Living with Frailty: From Assets and Deficits to Resilience. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rockwood, K, Song, X, MacKnight, C, Bergman, H, Hogan, DB, McDowell, I and Mitnitski, A (2005) A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people. Canadian Medical Association Journal 173, 489–495.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scambler, G (2009) Health-related stigma. Sociology of Health & Illness 31, 441–455.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shaw, RL, Gwyther, H, Holland, C, Bujnowska-Fedak, M, Kurpas, D, Cano, A, Marcucci, M, Riva, S and D'Avanzo, B (2018) Understanding frailty: meanings and beliefs about screening and prevention across key stakeholder groups in Europe. Ageing and Society 38, 1223–1252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skilbeck, JK, Arthur, A and Seymour, J (2018) Making sense of frailty: an ethnographic study of the experience of older people living with complex health problems. International Journal of Older People Nursing 13, e12172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomkow, L (2020) The emergence and utilisation of frailty in the United Kingdom: a contemporary biopolitical practice. Ageing & Society 40, 695–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuominen, K, Talja, S and Savolainen, R (2002) Discourse, cognition, and reality: towards a social constructionist metetheory for library and information science. In Bruce, H, Fidel, R, Ingwersen, P and Vakkari, P (eds). Emerging Frameworks and Methods: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science. CO: Greenwood, pp. 271–282.Google Scholar
Vehkakoski, TM (2007) Newborns with an impairment: discourses of hospital staff. Qualitative Health Research 17, 288–299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warmoth, K, Lang, IA, Phoenix, C, Abraham, C, Andrew, MK, Hubbard, RE and Tarrant, M (2016) ‘Thinking you're old and frail’: a qualitative study of frailty in older adults. Ageing & Society 36, 1483–1500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wetherell, M, Taylor, S and Yates, S (2001) Discourse Theory and Practice. A Reader. London: Sage.Google Scholar