Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-17T06:30:33.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Developments in conflict analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2009

Michael Nicholson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Conflict analysis has been making steady strides over the last decade. Admittedly it is not easy to define 'conflict analysis', 'conflict studies', or any of the other phrases used as near synonyms. 'Conflict and co-operation' subsumes virtually all social interactions. Roughly it can be said to be characterized by two themes: first, that conflict is a generic phenomenon which appears at all levels of social system from the interpersonal to the inter-national; second, that social phenomena can be analysed by the methods of the classical social sciences which primarily means the formulation of testable theoretical generalizations and their testing.

Type
Review Articles
Information
Review of International Studies , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , January 1988 , pp. 77 - 85
Copyright
Copyright © British International Studies Association 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. See Edwards, G. (Chairman), Horizons and Opportunities in the Social Sciences, ESRC, 1987.Google Scholar

2. Schelling, T. C., The Strategy of Conflict (Cambridge, MA, 1961).Google Scholar

3. Taylor, Michael, Anarchy and Co-operation (London and New York, 1976)Google Scholar and The Possibility of Cooperation (Cambridge and New York, 1987).Google Scholar

4. Brams, Steven J., Superior Beings: If They Exist, How Would We Know? Game-Theoretic Implications of Omniscience, Omnipotence, Immortality, and Incomprehensibility (New York, 1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5. See Nicholson, Michael, Oligopoly and Conflict: A Dynamic Approach (Liverpool, 1972)Google Scholar; Taylor, op. cit.

6. Howard, Nigel, Paradoxes of Rationality: Theory of Metagames and Political Behavior (Cambridge, MA, and London, 1971).Google Scholar

7. See, for example, Rapoport, Anatol, ‘Escape from Paradox’, Scientific American (07 1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8. See, for example, Shubik, Martin, ‘Game Theory, Behavior and Paradox: Three Solutions’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, xiv (1970), pp. 181–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9. Doob, Leonard, ‘A Cyprus Workshop’, Journal of Social Psychology, 94 (12 1974), pp. 161–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

10. Curie, Adam, Making Peace (London, 1971).Google Scholar