No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Strategic approaches to teaching and learning development for art and design librarians
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 April 2017
Abstract
At the University of the Arts London (UAL), Library Services and the University's educational development department have collaborated to ensure that teaching and learning development for its librarians is approached strategically and can be linked directly to the institutional teaching, learning and enhancement strategy. In doing so the librarians at UAL are provided with opportunities to develop pedagogic skills and techniques which acknowledge the arts education environment in which they are working and some of the specific differences which need to be considered when teaching art and design students. This paper presents some of the approaches and initiatives that have been deployed to achieve this.
Information
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Art Libraries Journal , Volume 42 , Special Issue 2: Information Literacy in UK and US Art Libraries , April 2017 , pp. 107 - 115
- Copyright
- Copyright © ARLIS/UK&Ireland 2017
References
1. Bennett, H. (2006). Bringing the studio into the library: addressing the research needs of studio art and architecture students. Art Documentation: Journal of the Art Libraries Society of North America, 25(1), 38–42 Google Scholar.
2. Zanin-Yost, A. & Tapley, E. (2008). Learning in the art classroom: making the connection between research and art. Art Documentation: Journal of the Art Libraries Society of North America, 27(2), 40–45 Google Scholar.
3. Schwarz, G. (2008) Balancing Literacies: Using Graphic Novels for Many Literacies. Balanced Reading Instruction 15(1), 1–10 Google Scholar.
4. Chatterjee, H. (2009). Object-based learning in higher education: the pedagogical power of museums, p.179–182. In Putting University Collections to Work in Teaching and Research – Proceedings of the 9th Conference of the International Committee of ICOM for University Museums and Collections (UMAC), 10th–13th September 2009. Berkley : ICOM.
5. Christie, P. (2015) ‘Revisioning academic support as an innovative and inclusive offer for creative arts students’ [online] SCONUL Focus 64. Available at http://www.sconul.ac.uk/sites/default/files/documents/14_17.pdf [Accessed 30 Sept 2016]
6. University of the Arts, London, (2013) Academic Support Strategy http://issuu.com/artslondonlibraries/docs/academic_support-8
7. Ibid Christie, p. 52.
8. University of the Arts London (2015) Strategy 2015–22: Transformative Education for a Creative World http://www.arts.ac.uk/about-ual/strategy-governance/ual-strategy-2015-22/
9. University of the Arts London (2015) Teaching, Learning and Enhancement Strategy 2015–22: Delivering transformative education http://www.arts.ac.uk/about-ual/teaching-and-learning/about-the-exchange/teaching--learning-strategy/
10. Elkins, J. (2001). Why Art Cannot Be Taught. University of Illinois Press Google Scholar
11. Shreeves, A., Sims, E. and Trowler, P. (2010) ‘A kind of exchange’: learning from art and design teaching, Higher Education Research & Development, 29:2, 125–138 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
12. Shulman, L. S. (2005) Pedagogies of uncertainty. Liberal Education, 91:2.
13. Ibid Chaterjee, p.179.
14. Ibid Schwarz.
15. Appleton, L. and Staddon, E. (2017) Developing a Teaching and Learning Programme for Librarians at UAL Library Services. SCONUL Focus 68 https://www.sconul.ac.uk/sites/default/files/documents/6_9.pdf