Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-lrvh5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-13T08:08:44.054Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Chemical corrosion of highly radioactive borosilicate nuclear waste glass under simulated repository conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Las Werme ,
Inga K. Björner ,
Gerhard Bart ,
Hans U. Zwicky ,
Bernd Grambow ,
Werner Lutze ,
Rodney C. Ewing  and
Claude Magrabi
Las Werme
Affiliation:
Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Company
Inga K. Björner
Affiliation:
Studsvik AB, Sweden
Gerhard Bart
Affiliation:
Paul-Scherrer-Institut, Switzerland
Hans U. Zwicky
Affiliation:
Paul-Scherrer-Institut, Switzerland
Bernd Grambow
Affiliation:
Hahn-Meitner-Institut Berlin, Federal Republic of Germany
Werner Lutze
Affiliation:
Hahn-Meitner-Institut Berlin, Federal Republic of Germany
Rodney C. Ewing
Affiliation:
The University of New Mexico
Claude Magrabi
Affiliation:
British Nuclear Fuels, plc., United Kingdom
Get access

Abstract

This review summarizes the results of the joint Japanese (Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry, CRIEPI, Tokyo), Swiss (National Cooperative for the Storage of Radioactive Waste, NAGRA, Baden), Swedish (Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Company, SKB, Stockholm) international ‘JSS’ project on the determination of the chemical durability of the French nuclear waste borosilicate glass, which was completed in 1988. Radioactive and nonradioactive glass specimens were investigated. A data base was created with results from glass corrosion tests performed with different water compositions, pH values, temperatures, sample surface areas (S), solution volumes (V), and flow rates. Glass corrosion tests were performed with and without bentonite and/or steel corrosion products present. Variation of the glass composition was taken into account by including the borosilicate glass ‘MW’ in the investigations, formulated by British Nuclear Fuels, plc. An understanding was achieved of the glass corrosion process in general, and of the performance of the French glass under various potential disposal conditions in particular. A special effort was made to establish a corrosion data base, using high S/V ratios in the experiments in order to understand the glass durability in the long term.

Information

Type
Commentaries and Reviews
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 5 , Issue 5 , May 1990 , pp. 1130 - 1146
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1 JSS-Projekt Phase I, SKB, Stockholm, Sweden, Technical Report 84–03 (1984).Google Scholar
2 JSS-Projekt Phase II, SKB, Stockholm, Sweden, Technical Report 85–01 (1985).Google Scholar
3 JSS-Projekt Phase III, SKB, Stockholm, Sweden, Technical Report 86–01 (1986).Google Scholar
4 JSS-Projekt Phase IV, SKB, Stockholm, Sweden, Technical Report 87–01 (1987).Google Scholar
5Grambow, B., SKB, Stockholm, Sweden, Technical Report 87–02 (1987).Google Scholar
6 JSS-Projekt Phase V, SKB, Stockholm, Sweden, Technical Report 88–02 (1988).Google Scholar
7Jercinovic, M.J. and Ewing, R. C., SKB, Stockholm, Sweden, Technical Report 88–01 (1987).Google Scholar
8Müller-Vonmoos, M. and Kahr, G., Technischer Bericht 83–12, Nagra, Baden, Switzerland (1983).Google Scholar
9 Anon., MCC-1P Static Leach Test Method, Nuclear Waste Materials Handbook, DOE/TIC-11400 (1981).Google Scholar
10 Anon., MCC-4S Low-Flow-Rate Leach Test Method, Nuclear Waste Materials Handbook, PNL-3990 (1981).Google Scholar
11Bart, G., Aerne, E.T., and Zwicky, H. U., Nucl. Instr. Methods B17, 127 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Grambow, B., Thesis, Ph.D., Freie Universität Berlin (1984), English transl. by E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Aiken, SC, DP-tr-78 (1985).Google Scholar
13Kuhn, W. L. and Peters, R. D. (Proc. Mater. Res. Soc. Symp.), edited by Brookins, D. G. (North-Holland, New York, 1983), Vol. 15, p. 167.Google Scholar
14Wallace, R. M. and Wicks, G. G. (Proc. Mater. Res. Soc. Symp.), edited by Brookins, D. G. (North-Holland, New York, 1983), Vol. 15, p. 23.Google Scholar
15Barkatt, A., Simmons, J. H., and Macedo, P. B., Nucl. and Chem. Waste Management 2, 3 (1981).Google Scholar
16Aagaard, P. and Helgeson, H. C., Amer. J. Science 281, 237 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17Wicks, G. G., Stone, J. A., Chandler, G.T., and Williams, S., Report DP-1728 (1986).Google Scholar
18Lutze, W., Müller, R., and Montserrat, W. (Proc. Mater. Res. Soc. Symp.) (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA, 1988), Vol. 112, p. 575.Google Scholar
19Parkhurst, D. L., Thorstensen, D. C., and Plummer, L. N., Phreeqe, Water-Resources Investigations. 80–96 (U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA), 1980. Extension to run precipitation controlled reactions by P. Offermann, HMI, Berlin, FRG (1983), updated with the Minteq data base by W. Howden and K. Kruppka, PNL, Richland, WA (1984).Google Scholar
20Fritz, B. and Kam, M., SKB Stockholm, Sweden Technical Report 85–10 (1985).Google Scholar
21Wanner, H. (Proc. Mater. Res. Soc. Symp.), edited by Werme, L.O. (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA, 1986), Vol. 50, p. 509.Google Scholar
22Lanza, F. and Ronsecco, C. (Proc. Mater. Res. Soc. Symp.), edited by W. Lutze (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA, 1982), Vol. 11, p. 173.Google Scholar
23McVay, G. L. and Buckwalter, C. Q., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 66, 170 (1983).Google Scholar
24Shade, J.W., Pederson, L. R., and McVay, G. L., Advances in Ceramics VIII, edited by Wicks, G. G. and Ross, W. A. (The Am. Ceram. Soc, Columbus, OH, 1983), p. 358.Google Scholar
25Malow, G., Lutze, W., and Ewing, R. C., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 67, 305 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26Lutze, W., Malow, G., Ewing, R. C., Jercinovic, M., and Keil, K., Nature 314, 252(1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27Ewing, R. C. and Jercinovic, M. J. (Proc. Mater. Res. Soc. Symp.), edited by J. K. Bates and W. B. Seefeldt (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA, 1987), Vol. 84, p. 67.Google Scholar
28Jakobsson, S. P. and Moore, J. G., Geological Society of America Bulletin 97, 648 (1986).2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29Grambow, B., Jercinovic, M. J., Ewing, R.C., and Byers, C. D. (Proc. Mater. Res. Soc. Symp., 1986), edited by Werme, L.O., Vol. 50, p. 263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30Grambow, B., Lutze, W., Ewing, R.C., and Werme, L.O. (Proc. Mater. Res. Soc. Symp., 1986), edited by Apted, M. J. and Westerman, R. E., Vol. 112, p. 531.Google Scholar
31Zavoshy, S. J., Chambré, P. L., and Pigford, T. H. (Proc. Mater. Res. Soc. Symp., 1985), edited by Jantzen, C. M., Stone, J. A., and Ewing, R. C., Vol. 44, p. 311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32Hench, L. L., Werme, L. O., and Lodding, A. (Proc. Mater. Res. Soc. Symp., 1982), edited by Lutze, W., Vol. 11, p. 153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33Barkatt, A., Macedo, P. B., Gibson, B.C., and Montrose, C. J. (Proc. Mater. Res. Soc. Symp., 1985), edited by Jantzen, C. M., Stone, J. A., and Ewing, R. C., Vol. 44, p. 3.Google Scholar
34Grambow, B. (Proc. Mater. Res. Soc. Symp., 1985), edited by Jantzen, CM., Stone, J. A., and Ewing, R.C., Vol. 44, p. 15.Google Scholar
35Lutze, W., in Radioactive Waste Forms for the Future, edited by Lutze, W. and Ewing, R.C. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1988), pp. 123–130.Google Scholar
36Lutze, W. and Ewing, R. C., in Radioactive Waste Forms for the Future, edited by Lutze, W. and Ewing, R.C. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1988), pp. 699–740.Google Scholar