Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-lrvh5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-14T18:42:54.463Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Immodest Proposal: Foucault, Hysterization, and the “Second Rape”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Laura Hengehold
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article places Foucault's 1977 suggestions regarding the reform of French rape law in the context of ongoing feminist debates as to whether rape should be considered a sex crime or a species of assault. When viewed as a disciplinary matrix with both physical and discursive effects, rape and the rape trial clearly contribute to the “hysterization” of women by cultivating complainants' confessions in order to demonstrate their supposed lack of self-knowledge.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 9 , Issue 3 , Summer 1994 , pp. 88 - 107
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bartky, Sandra. 1988. Foucault, femininity, and the modernization of patriarchal power. In Feminism and Foucault: Reflections on resistance. See Diamond and Quinby.Google Scholar
Bartky, Sandra. 1990. Femininity and domination: Studies in the phenomenology of oppression. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Berliner, Dana. 1991. Rethinking the reasonable belief defense to rape. Yale Law Journal 100: 2687–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Vicki. 1991. “Beyond the thorny question”: Feminism, Foucault, and the desexualization of rape. International Journal of the Sociobgy of Law 19: 83–100.Google Scholar
Brownmiller, Susan. 1975. Against our will: Men, women, and rape. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Buchanan, Ruth, and Trubek, Louise. 1992. Resistances and possibilities: A critical and practical look at public interest lawyering. Review of Law and Social Change 19(4): 687–719.Google Scholar
Bumiller, Kristin. 1987. Rape as a legal symbol: An essay on sexual violence and racism. University of Miami Law Review 42: 75–91.Google Scholar
Bumiller, Kristin. 1990. Fallen angels: The representation of violence against women in legal culture. International Journal of the Sociology of Law 18: 125–42.Google Scholar
Bunting, Annie. 1992. Feminism, Foucault, and law as power/knowledge. Alberta Law Review 30(3): 829–42.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1987. Variations on sex and gender: Beauvoir, Wittig, and Foucault. In Feminism as critique: Essays on the politics of gender, ed.Benhabib, Seyla and Cornell, Drucilla. Cambridge: Polity Press; Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith 1991. Contingent foundations: Feminism and the question of “postmodernism.” Praxis International 11(2): 150–65.Google Scholar
Cahn, Naomi. 1992. The looseness of legal language: The reasonable woman standard in theory and in practice. Cornell Law Review 77: 1398–1446.Google Scholar
Clark, Lorenne, and Lewis, Debra. 1977. Rape: The price of coercive sexuality. Toronto: Toronto Women's Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Angela. 1990. Women, culture, politics. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
De Lauretis, Teresa. 1987. Technologies of gender: Essays on theory, film, and fiction. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, Irene, and Quinby, Lee. 1988. Feminism and Foucault: Reflections on resistance. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Dumaresq, Delia. 1981. Rape—Sexuality in the Law. m/f 5‐6: 41–59.Google Scholar
Eisenstein, Zillah. 1988. The female body and the law. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Estrich, Susan. 1987. Real rape. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Estrich, Susan. 1992. Palm Beach stories. Law and Philosophy 11: 5–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forrester, John. 1990. The seductions of psychoanalysis: Freud, Lacan, and Derrida. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1977a. Enfermement, psychiatrie, prison: Dialogue avec Michel Foucault et David Cooper. Change 32‐33: 76–110.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1977b. Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Trans.Sheridan, Alan. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1978. The history of sexuality Vol. 1. Trans.Hurley, Robert. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1980. Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972‐1977. ed.Gordon, Colin; trans. Gordon, Colinet al. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1988a. Politics, philosophy, culture: Interviews and other writings, 1977‐1984. ed.Kritzman, Lawrence D.; trans. Sheridan, Alanet al. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1988b. The final Foucault. ed.Bernauerand, JamesRasmussen, David. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. 1989. Unruly practices: Power, discourse, and gender in contemporary social theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Hartsock, Nancy. 1990. Foucault on power: A theory for women? In Feminism/Postmodernism, ed.Nicholson, Linda. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1985. This sex which is not one. Trans. Catherine Porter with Carolyn Burke. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lacan, Jacques. 1977. Ecrits: A selection. Trans.Sheridan, Alan. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine. 1989. Toward a feminist theory of the state. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Madigan, Lee, and Gamble, Nancy. 1991. The second rape: Society's continued betrayal of the victim. Toronto: Macmillan; New York: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Matthews, Nancy A. 1989. Surmounting a legacy: The expansion of racial diversity in a local anti‐rape movement. Gender and Society 3(4): 518–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNay, Lois. 1991. The Foucauldian body and the exclusion of experience. Hypatia 6(3): 125–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNay, Lois. 1993. Foucault and feminism: Power, gender, and the self. Boston: Northeastern University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Plaza, Monique. [1978] 1981. Our damages and their compensation. Feminist Issues 1(3): 5–35.Google Scholar
Sawicki, Jana. 1991. Disciplining Foucault: Feminism, power, and the body. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Singer, Linda. 1993. Erotic welfare: Sexual theory and politics in the age of epidemic, ed.Butler, Judith and MacGrogan, Maureen. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Smart, Carol. 1989. Feminism and the power of law. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stern, Lesley. 1980. Introduction to Plaza. m/f 4: 21–27.Google Scholar
Tong, Rosemarie. 1984. Women, sex, and the law. Savage, Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Woodhull, Winifred. 1988. Sexuality, power, and the question of rape. In Feminism and Foucault: Reflections on resistance. See Diamond and Quinby.Google Scholar