Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-nlwjb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-11T19:08:48.822Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

CVC light syllables, geminates and Moraic Theory*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 October 2008

Bernard Tranel
Bernard Tranel
Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The functional equivalence of CVV and CVC syllables, as opposed to CV syllables, is a time-honoured observation holding true for numerous languages over a variety of phonological and morphological phenomena, including stress assignment (cf. Newman 1972 for a review). Traditionally, the opposition between the two types of syllables has been informally described by reference to syllable weight: CVV and CVC syllables are heavy, CV syllables are light (e.g. La Grasserie 1909: 31–32). It has also been observed, however, that in languages sensitive to the CV/CVV distinction, CVC syllables do not necessarily pattern with CVV syllables, but may instead pattern with CV syllables, thus counting as light rather than heavy (Hyman 1985: 5–6; McCarthy & Prince 1986: 32–34; Hayes 1989: 255–256).

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Phonology , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , August 1991 , pp. 291 - 302
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Archangeli, Diana (1989). Prosodic syllabification and Yawelmani ‘CVVC’ syllables. Ms, University of Arizona.Google Scholar
Callaghan, Catherine A. (1964). Phonemic borrowing in Lake Miwok. In Bright, William (ed.) Studies in Californian linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press. 46–53.Google Scholar
Clements, , George, N. & Keyser, Samuel Jay (1983). CV phonology: a generative theory of the syllable. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fouché, Pierre (1969). Phonétique historique du français. 3 vols. 2nd edn.Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Clements, G. N. (1983). Problem book in phonology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Vergnaud, Jean-Roger (1987). An essay on stress. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce (1981). A metrical theory of stress rules. Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce (1986). Inalterability in CV phonology. Lg 62. 321–351.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce (1989). Compensatory lengthening in moraic phonology. LI 20. 253–306.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. (1985). A theory of phonological weight. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Itô, Junko (1986). Syllable theory in prosodic phonology. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Itô, Junko (1989). A prosodic theory of epenthesis. NLLT 7. 217–259.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul (1973). ‘Elsewhere’ in phonology. In Anderson, Stephen R. & Kiparsky, Paul (eds.) A Festschrift for Morris Halle. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. 93–106.Google Scholar
La Grasserie, Raoul de (1909). De l'accent comparé dans les diverses langues. Paris: Geuthner.Google Scholar
Lahiri, Aditi & Koreman, Jacques (1988). Syllable weight and quantity in Dutch. WCCFL 7. 217–228.Google Scholar
Levin, Juliette (1985). A metrical theory of syllabicity. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Levin, Juliette (1988). The autonomy of the skeleton: evidence from Micronesian. Ms, University of Texas, Austin.Google Scholar
Lightner, Theodore M. (1971). On Swadesh and Voegelin's ‘A problem in phonological alternation’. IJAL 37. 227–237.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John (1989). Linear order in phonological representation. LI 20. 71–99.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John & Prince, Alan (1986). Prosodic morphology. Ms, University of Massachusetts, Amherst & Brandeis University.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John & Prince, Alan (1988). Quantitative transfer in reduplicative and templatic morphology. In Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.) Linguistics in the morning calm 2. Seoul: Hanshin. 3–35.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John & Prince, Alan (1990a). Foot and word in prosodic morphology: the Arabic broken plural. NLLT 8. 209–283.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John & Prince, Alan (1990b). Prosodic morphology and templatic morphology. In Eid, Mushira & McCarthy, John (eds.) New perspectives on Arabic linguistics II. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 1–54.Google Scholar
McCawley, James D. (1969). Length and voicing in Tübatulabal. CLS 5. 407–415.Google Scholar
Marantz, Alec (1982). Re reduplication. LI 12. 435–482.Google Scholar
Mohanan, K. P. (1982). Lexical Phonology. Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Mohanan, K. P. (1986). The theory of Lexical Phonology. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Nash, D. (1980). Topics in Warlpiri grammar. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Newman, Paul (1972). Syllable weight as a phonological variable. Studies in African Linguistics 3. 301–324.Google Scholar
Piggott, G. L. (1991). Empty onsets: evidence for the skeleton in prosodic phonology. Ms, McGill University.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan (1984). Phonology with tiers. In Aronoff, Mark & Oehrle, Richard T. (eds.) Language sound structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 234–244.Google Scholar
Schein, Barry & Steriade, Donca (1986). On geminates. LI 17. 691–744.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth (forthcoming a). A two-root theory of length. University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers 14.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth (forthcoming b). On the inalterability of geminates. In Bertinetto, P. M. & Loporcaro, M. (eds.) Certamen Phonologicum: papers from the 2nd Cortona Phonology Meeting. Turin: Rosenberg & Sellier.Google Scholar
Steriade, Donca (1988). Greek accent: a case for preserving structure. LI 19. 271–314.Google Scholar
Swadesh, Morris & Voegelin, Charles F. (1939). A problem in phonological alternation. Lg 15. 1–10. Reprinted 1957 in Joos, Martin (ed.) Readings in linguistics I. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 88–92.Google Scholar
Tranel, Bernard (1990). Position theories and the representation of final consonants in French. Ms, University of California, Irvine.Google Scholar
Voegelin, Charles F. (1935). Tübatulabal grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Yip, Moira (1991). Coronals, consonant clusters, and the coda condition. In Paradis, Carole & Prunet, Jean-Francois (eds.) The special status of coronals. San Francisco: Academic Press. 61–78.Google Scholar