Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-rxvq6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-15T01:18:33.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Aspects of underspecification theory*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 October 2008

Diana Archangeli
Diana Archangeli
Affiliation:
University of Arizona
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

An evaluation metric in Universal Grammar provides a means of selecting between possible grammars for a particular language. The evaluation metric as conceived in Chomsky & Halle (1968; henceforth SPE) prefers the grammar in which only the idiosyncratic properties are lexically listed and predictable properties are derived. The essence of underspecification theory is to supply such predictable distinctive features or feature specifications by rule. Viewed in this way, the general idea of underspecification has always been a part of any theory of phonology that includes such an evaluation metric.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Phonology , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , August 1988 , pp. 183 - 207
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Abaglo, P. & Archangeli, D. (forthcoming). Language particular Underspecification: Gengbe /e/ and Yoruba /i/. LI.Google Scholar
Anderson, J., Ewen, C. & Staun, J. (1985). Phonological structure: segmental, supra-segmental and extrasegmental. Ph Y 2. 203–224.Google Scholar
Archangeli, D. (1983). The root CV template as a property of the affix: evidence from Yawelmani. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory I. 347–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archangeli, D. (1984). Underspecification in Yawelmani phonology and morphology. PhD dissertation, MIT. Published 1988, New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Archangeli, D. (1985). Underspecification in underlying representation. In Youmans, G. (ed.) In memory of Roman Jakobson: papers from the 1984 Mid-America Linguistics Conference. Columbia, Mo.: Linguistic Area Program. 3–15.Google Scholar
Archangeli, D. & Pulleyblank, D. (1987). Maximal and minimal rules: effects of tier scansion. NELS 17. 16–35.Google Scholar
Archangeli, D. & Pulleyblank, D. (forthcoming a). The content and structure of phonological representations. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Archangeli, D. & Pulleyblank, D. (forthcoming b). Yoruba vowel harmony. LI.Google Scholar
Bosch, A., Need, B. & Schiller, E. (eds.) (1987). Papers from the parasession on autosegmental and metrical phonology. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Carrier-Duncan, J. (1984). Syllabic templates in morphology. Paper presented at the 15th Annual Meeting of the North-East Linguistic Society, Brown University.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Christdas, P. (in preparation). The phonology and morphology of Tamil. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Clements, G. N. (1981). Akan vowel harmony: a nonlinear analysis. Harvard Studies in Phonology 2. 108–177.Google Scholar
Clements, G. N. (1985). The geometry of phonological features. Ph Y 2. 225–252.Google Scholar
Clements, G. N. (1987a). Towards a substantive theory of feature specification. Paper presented at the UCLA Symposium on Segment Structure, October 1987.Google Scholar
Clements, G. N. (1987b). Phonological feature representation and the description of intrusive stops. In Bosch, et al. (1987). 29–50.Google Scholar
Clements, G. N. & Ford, K. (1979). Kikuyu tone shift and its synchronic consequences. LI 10. 179–210.Google Scholar
Clements, G. N. & Keyser, S. J. (1983). CV phonology: a generative theory of the syllable. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clements, G. N. & Sezer, E. (1982). Vowel and consonant disharmony in Turkish. In van der, Hulst & Smith, (1982: vol. 2). 213–255.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, J. (1976). Autosegmental phonology. PhD dissertation, MIT. Published 1979, New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, J. (1985). Vowel harmony in Khalkha Mongolian, Yaka, Finnish and Hungarian. Ph Y 2. 253–275.Google Scholar
Halle, M. (1959). The sound pattern of Russian. Mouton: The Hague.Google Scholar
Halle, M. & Vergnaud, J. R. (1982). On the framework of autosegmental phonology. In van der, Hulst & Smith, (1982: vol. I). 65–82.Google Scholar
Halle, M. & Vergnaud, J. R. (1987). An essay on stress. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hammond, M. (1984). Constraining metrical theory: a modular theory of rhythm and destressing. PhD dissertation, UCLA. Forthcoming, New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Hammond, M. (1987). Hungarian cola. Ph Y 4. 267–269.Google Scholar
Hangin, J. (1968). A basic course in Mongolian. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Harris, J. (1983). Syllable structure and stress in Spanish: a nonlinear analysis. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hayes, B. (1980). A metrical theory of stress rules. PhD dissertation, MIT. Distributed 1981, Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Hooper, J. B. (1972). The syllable in phonological theory. Lg 48. 525–540.Google Scholar
Hulst, H. Van Der & Smith, N. (eds.) (1982). The structure of phonological representations. 2 vols. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Hyman, L. (1985). A theory of phonological weight. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Itô, J. (1986). Syllable theory in prosodic phonology. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Itô, J. & Mester, A. (1986). The phonology of voicing in Japanese: theoretical consequences for morphological accessibility. LI 17. 49–73.Google Scholar
Kahn, D. (1976). Syllable-based generalizations in English phonology. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Kaye, J., Lowenstamm, J. & Vergnaud, J.-R. (1985). The internal structure of phonological elements: a theory of charm and government. Ph Y 2. 305–328.Google Scholar
Kean, M. L. (1975). The theory of markedness in generative grammar. PhD dissertation, MIT. Distributed 1980, Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Keating, P. (1985). CV phonology, experimental phonetics, and coarticulation. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 62. 1–13.Google Scholar
Keating, P. (1987). The window model of coarticulation: articulatory evidence. Paper presented at the 1st Conference on Laboratory Phonology, Columbus, Ohio.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1981). Vowel harmony. Ms, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1982). Lexical morphology and phonology. In Yang, I.-S. (ed.) Linguistics in the morning calm. Seoul: Hanshin. 3–91.Google Scholar
Kuroda, S.-Y. (1967). Yawelmani phonology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Leben, W. (1973). Suprasegmental phonology. PhD dissertation, MIT. Distributed by Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Lees, R. B. (1961). The phonology of modern standard Turkish. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Liberman, M. & Prince, A. (1977). On stress and linguistic rhythm. LI 8. 249–336.Google Scholar
Lightner, T. M. (1963). A note on the formulation of phonological rules. MIT Quarterly Progress Report of the Research Laboratory of Electronics 68. 187–189.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. (1979). Formal problems in Semitic phonology and morphology. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. (1981). A prosodic theory of nonconcatenative morphology. LI 12. 373–418.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. (1987). Planes and linear ordering. Ms, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. & Prince, A. (1986). Prosodic morphology. Ms, University of Massachusetts, Amherst and Brandeis University.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. & Prince, A. (1987). Quantitative transfer in reduplicative and templatic morphology. Ms, University of Massachusetts, Amherst and Brandeis University.Google Scholar
Maddieson, I. (1984). Patterns of sounds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Öhman, S. E. G. (1966). Coarticulation in VCV utterances: spectrographic measurements. JASA 39. 151–168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pierrehumbert, J. & Beckman, M. (forthcoming). Japanese tone structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pollard, C. & Sag, I. (1987). Information-based syntax and semantics. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Poppe, N. (1970). Mongolian language handbook. Washington D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Prince, A. (1983). Relating to the grid. LI 14. 19–100.Google Scholar
Pulleyblank, D. (1983). Tone in Lexical Phonology. PhD dissertation, MIT. Published 1986, Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Pulleyblank, D. (1985). A lexical treatment of tone in Tiv. In Goyvaerts, D. L. (ed.) African linguistics: essays in memory of M. W. K. Semikenke. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 421–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pulleyblank, D. (1986). Underspecification and low vowel harmony in Okpe. Studies in African Linguistics 17. 119–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pulleyblank, D. (1988). Vocalic Underspecification in Yoruba. LI 19. 233–270.Google Scholar
Ringen, C. (1975). Vowel harmony: theoretical implications. PhD dissertation, Indiana University.Google Scholar
Sagey, E. (1986). The representation of features and relations in non-linear phonology. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Saint, R. & Pike, K. L. (1962). Auca phonemics. In Elson, B. (ed.) Studies in Ecuadorian Indian languages. Vol. i. Norman: Summer Institute of Linguistics. 2–30.Google Scholar
Schein, B. & Steriade, D. (1986). On geminates. LI 17. 691–744.Google Scholar
Spring, C. (1987). Geminate structures in prosodic phonology. Ms, University of Arizona.Google Scholar
Stanley, R. (1967). Redundancy rules in phonology. Lg 43. 393–436.Google Scholar
Steriade, D. (1979). Vowel harmony in Khalkha Mongolian. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics I. 25–50.Google Scholar
Steriade, D. (1982). Greek prosodies and the nature of syllabification. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Steriade, D. (1987). Redundant values. In Bosch, et al. (1987). 339–362.Google Scholar
Street, J. (1962). Khalkha structure. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, N. S. (1967) [1939]. Principes de phonologie. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Tryon, D. T. (1970). An introduction to Maranungku (Northern Australia). Pacific Linguistics Series B 15. Canberra: The Australian National University.Google Scholar
Vennemann, T. (1972). On the theory of syllabic phonology. Linguistiche Berichte 18. 1–8.Google Scholar
Whitney, W. (1885). The roots, verb-forms, and primary derivatives of the Sanskrit language. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel.Google Scholar
Whitney, W. (1889). Sanskrit grammar. Reprinted 1931, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, E. (1971). Underlying tone in Margi and Igbo. Published 1976. LI 7.Google Scholar