Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-pn7tm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-14T19:19:11.040Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Debunking Corporate Moral Responsibility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

Manuel Velasquez
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

I address three topics. First, I argue that the issue of corporate moral responsibility is an important one for business ethics. Second, I examine a core argument for the claim that the corporate organization is a separate moral agent and show it is based on an unnoticed but elementary mistake deriving from the fallacy of division. Third, I examine the assumptions collectivists make about what it means to say that organizations act and that they act intentionally and show that these assumptions are mistaken in their failure to understand the nature of intentional causality and of “as-if” intentionality. In exposing these mistakes I set out my own view in the form of two theses, the first of which states that individual members of an organization are always causally responsible for any corporate act, and the second of which states that attributions of intentions to corporations are always either descriptive or prescriptive attributions of “as if” intentionality.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Business Ethics Quarterly , Volume 13 , Issue 4 , October 2003 , pp. 531 - 562
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bates, Stanley. 1971. “The Responsibility of ‘Random Collectives.’” Ethics 81: 343–349.Google Scholar
Blackburn, Simon. 1996. The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Block, Ned, ed. 1980. Readings in the Philosophy of Psychology. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Block, Ned, and Fodor, J.. 1972. “What Psychological States are Not.” Philosophical Review 81: 159–181.Google Scholar
Chisholm, Roderick. 1976. Persons and Object: A Metaphysical Study. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Cooper, D. E. 1968, “Collective Responsibility.” Philosophy 43: 258–268.Google Scholar
Copp, D. 1962. “What Collectives Are: Agency, Individualism, and Legal Theory.” Dialogue 23: 249–269.Google Scholar
Curtler, H., ed. 1986. Shame, Responsibility and the Corporation.Google Scholar
Donaldson, Thomas. 1980. “Moral Agency and Corporations.” Philosophy in Context 10: 51–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, Tom. 1982. Corporations and Morality. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice Hall: 1982.Google Scholar
French, Peter. 1975. “Types of Collectivities and Blame.” The Personalist 56: 160–169.Google Scholar
French, Peter. 1979. The Scope of Morality. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
French, Peter. 1982. “Crowds and Corporations.” American Philosophical Quarterly 19: 27–77.Google Scholar
French, Peter. 1984. Collective and Corporate Responsibility. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, Peter. 1985. “The Hester Prynne Sanction.” Business & Professional Ethics Journal 4: 19–32.Google Scholar
Gallois, Andre. 1998. Occasions of Identity. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Georgiadis, Constantine. 1973. “Two Conceptions of Substance in Aristotle.” The New Scholasticism 47(1).Google Scholar
Gierke, Otto. 1958. Political Theories of the Middle Age, trans. Frederick William Maitland. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Goodman, Nelson. 1972. “A World of Individuals.” In Nelson, Goodman, Problems and Projects. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill: 155–172.Google Scholar
Goodpaster, Kenneth E. 1984. “The Concept of Corporate Responsibility.” In Just Business: New Introductory Essays in Business Ethics, ed. Tom, Regan. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Goodpaster, Kenneth E., and John, B. Matthews Jr. 1982. “Can a Corporation Have a Conscience?” Harvard Business Review 60: 132–141.Google Scholar
Harris, Kathryn. 1982. “Chips Maker Feels Attack on Four Sides.” Los Angeles Times (4 April).Google Scholar
Held, Virginia. 1970. “Can a Random Collection of Individuals be Morally Responsible?” Journal of Philosophy 47: 471–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, Michael, and Jennifer, Moore, eds. 1984. Business Ethics: Readings and Cases in Corporate Morality. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Keeley, Michael. 1979. “Organizations as Non-Persons.” Journal of Value Inquiry 15: 149–155.Google Scholar
Keeley, Michael. 1988. A Social Contract Theory of Organizations (Notre, Dame, 1988)Google Scholar
Ladd, John. 1984. “Corporate Mythology and Individual Responsibility.” International Journal of Applied Philosophy 2: 1–21.Google Scholar
Laufer, William S. 1996. “Corporate Culpability and the Limits of Law.” Business Ethics Quarterly 6(3): 311–324.Google Scholar
May, Larry. 1987. The Morality of Groups: Collective Responsibility, Group-Based Harm, and Corporate Rights. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
May, Larry, and Stacey, Hoffman, eds. 1991. Collective Responsibility: Five Decades of Debate in Theoretical and Applied Ethics. Savage, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
McMahon, Christopher. 1995. “The Ontological and Moral Status of Organizations.” Business Ethics Quarterly 5(3): 541–554.Google Scholar
Nesteruk, Jeffrey. 1992. “The Moral Status of the Corporation: Comments on an Inquiry.” Business Ethics Quarterly 2(4): 461–464.Google Scholar
Oderberg, David S. 1993. The Metaphysics of Identity Over Time. New York: St. Martin’s Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ozar, David T. 1979. “The Moral Responsibility of Corporations.” In Ethical Issues in Business: A Philosophical Approach, ed. Thomas, Donaldson and Patricia, Werhane. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall: 294–299.Google Scholar
Phillips, Michael. 1992. “Corporate Moral Personhood and Three Conceptions of the Corporation.” Business Ethics Quarterly 2(4): 435–460.Google Scholar
Phillips, Michael. 1995a. “Corporate Moral Responsibility.” Business Ethics Quarterly 5(3): 555–576.Google Scholar
Phillips, Michael. 1995b. “Corporate Moral Responsibility: When It Might Matter.” Business Ethics Quarterly 5(3).Google Scholar
Rafalko, Robert J. 1989. “Corporate Punishment: A Proposal.” Journal of Business Ethics 8: 917–928.Google Scholar
Rescher, Nicholas. 1955. “Axioms for the Part Relation.” Philosophical Studies 6: 8–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seabright, Mark A., and Kurke, Lance B.. 1997. “Organizational Ontology and the Moral Status of the Corporation.” Business Ethics Quarterly 7(4): 91–108.Google Scholar
Searle, John. 1980. “Intrinsic Intentionality: Reply to Criticisms of Minds, Brains, and Programs.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3: 450–456.Google Scholar
Searle, John. 1992. The Rediscovery of the Mind. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Searle, John. 1995. The Construction of Social Reality. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Searle, John. 1999. Mind, Language, and Society. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Simons, Peter. 1987. Parts, A Study in Ontology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Surber, Jere. 1983. “Individual and Corporate Responsibility: Two Alternative Approaches.” Business & Professional Ethics Journal 2: 67–88.Google Scholar
Sylvester, David. 1984a. “National Semi May Lose Defense Jobs.” San Jose Mercury News (31 May).Google Scholar
Sylvester, David. 1984b. “The Day 2 Million Soviet Missiles ‘Attacked’ the U.S.” San Jose Mercury News (3 June).Google Scholar
Sylvester, David. 1984c. “The 91 Steps to a Fail-safe Chip.” San Jose Mercury News (4 June).Google Scholar
Velasquez, Manuel. 1983. “Why Corporations are Not Morally Responsible for Anything They Do.” Business and Professional Ethics Journal 2(3).Google Scholar
Velasquez, Manuel. 1985. “Commentary on French.” Business and Professional Ethics Journal 4: 35–38.Google Scholar
Walt, S., and Laufer, W.S.. 1991. “Why Personhood Doesn’t Matter: Corporate Criminal Liability and Sanctions.” American Journal of Criminal Law 18: 263–287.Google Scholar
Werhane, Patricia H. 1985. Persons, Rights, and Corporations. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Willman, David. 1984. “DCIS: The Pentagon’s Sleuth Against Fraud.” San Jose Mercury News (4 June).Google Scholar
Willman, David, and David, Sylvester. 1984a. “2 Workers Tried to Stop the Cheating.” San Jose Mercury News (3 June).Google Scholar
Willman, David. 1984b. “How Tests Were Faked at National.” San Jose Mercury News (3 June).Google Scholar
Willman, David. 1984c. “National Semi Pleads Guilty to Scheme.” San Jose Mercury News (7 March).Google Scholar