Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-pjp64 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-31T11:36:51.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kaldor's Growth Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Nancy J. Wulwick
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The last decade has seen an outburst of growth models designed to replace the conventional Solow growth model, with its exogenous trend of technical progress, by more realistic models that generate increasing returns (to labor, capital and/or scale) as a result of endogenous technical progress. In contrast to the Solow model, the new models suggest that policy interventions can affect the long-run rate of economic growth. Nicholas Kaldor's growth model, designed in the late 1950s and early 1960s to replace the Solow growth model, is a precursor of the new growth models.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , Spring 1992 , pp. 36 - 54
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Arrow, K. J. 1962. “The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing,” Review of Economic Studies, 29, 155–73.Google Scholar
Bairam, E. I. 1987. “The Verdoorn Law, Returns to Scale and Industrial Growth: A Review of the Literature,” Australian Economic Papers, 26, 20–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumol, W. J. and Wolff, E. N.. 1988. “Productivity Growth, Convergence, and Welfare: Reply,” American Economic Review, 78, 59–1155.Google Scholar
Boyer, R. and Petit, P.. 1991. “Kaldor's Growth Theories: Past, Present and Prospects for the Future,” in Nell, E. J. and Semmler, W., eds., Nicholas Kaldor and Mainstream Economics, Macmillian, London.Google Scholar
Champernowne, D. G. 1954. “On the Use and Misuse of Mathematics in Presenting Economic Theory,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 36, 369–72.Google Scholar
Clark, Colin 1940. The Conditions of Economic Progress, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Economist. 1966. “The Explanation of SET,” 5 11, pp. 547–78.Google Scholar
Gilbert, C. L. 1991. “Richard Stone, Demand Theory and the Emergence of Modern Econometrics,” Economic Journal, 101, 288–302.Google Scholar
Haache, G. 1979. The Theory of Economic Growth: An Introduction, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Hahn, F. 1989. “Kaldor on Growth,” in Lawson, T., Palma, J. G. and Sender, J., eds., Kaldor's Political Economy, Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Hahn, F. and Matthews, R. C. O.. 1964. “The Theory of Economic Growth: A Survey,” Economic Journal, 74, 779–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrod, R. 1965. “Review: Essays on Economic Policy, by N. Kaldor,” Economic Journal, 75, 794–802.Google Scholar
Hill, A. T. P. and McGibbon, J.. 1966. “Growth of Sector Real Product,” Review of Income and Wealth, ser. 12, 35–55.Google Scholar
Johnston, J. 1967. “Econometrics: Achievements and Prospects,” Three Banks Review, no. 73, 3–22.Google Scholar
Jones, G. T. 1933. Increasing Returns, Cambridge University Press, London.Google Scholar
Kaldor, N. 1957. “A Model of Economic Growth,” Economic Journal, 67, 591–624.Google Scholar
Kaldor, N. 1958. “Capital Accumulation and Economic Growth”, in Lutz, F. A. and Hague, D. C., eds., Theory of Capital, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Kaldor, N. 1960. “A Rejoinder to Mr Atsumi and Professor Tobin,” Review of Economic Studies, 28, 121–23.Google Scholar
Kaldor, N. 1966. Causes of the Slow Rate of Economic Growth of the United Kingdom, University of Cambridge Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kaldor, N. 1966. “Marginal Productivity and the Macro-economic Theories of Distribution,” Review of Economic Studies, 33, 309–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaldor, N. 1968. “Productivity and Growth in Manufacturing Industry: A Reply,” Economica, 35, 385–91.Google Scholar
Kaldor, N. 1972. “The Irrelevance of Equilibrium Economics,” Economic Journal, 82, 55–1237.Google Scholar
Kaldor, N. 1975. “Economic Growth and the Verdoorn Law: A Comment on Mr Rowthorn's Article,” Economic Journal, 85, 891–95.Google Scholar
Kaldor, N. 1980. “The Economics of the Selective Employment Tax,” in Kaldor, N., Reports on Taxation 1, Holmes and Meier, New York.Google Scholar
Kaldor, N. 1989. “Recollections of an Economist,” in Kregel, J., ed., Recollections of Eminent Economists, 1, New York University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Kaldor, N. and Mirrlees, K. 1962. “A New Model of Economic Growth,” Review of Economic Studies, 25, 174–92.Google Scholar
Lucas, R. E. 1988. “On the Mechanics of Economic Development,” Journal of Monetary Economics, 22, 3–42.Google Scholar
Lucas, R. E. 1990. “Why Doesn't Capital Flow from Rich to Poor Countries,” American Economic Review, 80, 92–96.Google Scholar
Novick, D. 1954. “Mathematics: Logic, Quantity, and Method,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 36, 357–58.Google Scholar
OECD. 1966. Productivity Measurement, 3, Paris.Google Scholar
Quandt, R. E. 1976. “Some Quantitative Aspects of the Economics Journal Literature,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 85, 741–55.Google Scholar
Romer, M. 1983. “Dynamic Competitive Equilibria with Externalities, Increasing Returns and Unbounded Growth,” unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Romer, M. 1986. “Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth,” Journal of Political Economy, 94, 37–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romer, M. 1986. “Increasing Returns, Specialization, and External Economies: Growth as Described by Allyn Young,” University Center for Economic Research Working Paper, no. 64.Google Scholar
Romer, M. 1989. “Capital Accumulation in the Theory of Long-run Growth,” in Barro, R. J., ed., Modern Business Cycle Theory, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rowthorn, R. E. 1979. “A Note on Verdoorn's Law,” Economic Journal, 89, 131–33.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. 1988. “The Passing of the Old Guard,” Eastern Economic Journal, 14, 319–30.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. 1989. “Remembering Joan,” in Feiwel, G., ed., Joan Robinson and Modern Economic Theory, New York University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Scott, M. F. 1989. A New View of Economic Growth, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Solow, R. J. 1956. “A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth,” in Stiglitz, J. E. and Uzawa, H., eds., Readings in the Modern Theory of Economic Growth, MIT Press, Boston, 1969.Google Scholar
Solow, R. J. 1957. “Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 39, 312–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solow, R. J. 1959. “Investment and Technical Progress,” in Arrow, K. J., Karlin, S., Suppes, P., eds., Mathematical Methods in the Social Sciences, Stanford University Press, Stanford.Google Scholar
Solow, R. J. 1962. “Technical Progress, Capital Formation, and Economic Growth,” American Economic Review, 52, 76–92.Google Scholar
Svennilson, I. 1945. “Industriarbetets växande avkastning i belysning av svenska erfarenheter,” in Heckscher, E. F., ed., Studier I Ekonomi Och Historia,Almqvist and Wicksells, Uppsala.Google Scholar
Svennilson, I. 1954. Growth and Stagnation in the European Economy, United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, Geneva.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, J. 1988. “The Role of Errors in Scientific Development,” Review of Social Economy, 46, 225–30.Google Scholar
Thirlwall, A. P. 1980. “Rowthorn's Interpretation of Verdoorn's Law,” Economic Journal, 90, 386–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thirlwall, A. P. 1983. “Introduction: A Plain Man's Guide to Kaldor's Growth Laws,” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 5, 341–58.Google Scholar
Thirlwall, A. P. 1987. Nicholas Kaldor, Wheatsheaf Publishers, Brighton.Google Scholar
Thirlwall, A. P. and Dixon, R. 1975. “Regional Growth-Rate Differences on Kaldorian Lines,” Oxford Economic Papers, 26, 201–14.Google Scholar
Verdoorn, P. J. 1949. “Factors that Determine the Growth of Labour Productivity,” L'Industria, English translation available upon request from Thirlwall, A. P., University of Kent at Canterbury.Google Scholar
Wulwick, N. J. 1983. “Can Keynesian Economics Be Scientific: An Historical Reconstruction,” Eastern Economic Journal, 9, 190–204.Google Scholar
Wulwick, N. J. 1990. “The Mathematics of Economic Growth,” The Jerome Levy Institute at Bard College Working Paper, no. 38.Google Scholar
Wulwick, N. J. 1991. “Did the Verdoorn Law Hang on Japan?” Eastern Economic Journal, 17, 15–19.Google Scholar
Young, A. 1928. “Increasing Returns and Economic Progress,” Economic Journal, 38, 518–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar