Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-rbxfs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-13T02:05:09.524Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hippocampal Volumes in Amnestic and Non-Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment Types Using Two Common Methods of MCI Classification

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2021

Natalie A. Emmert
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
Katherine E. Reiter
Affiliation:
Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
Alissa Butts
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
Julie K Janecek
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
Mohit Agarwal
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
Malgorzata Franczak
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
James Reuss
Affiliation:
Prism Clinical Imaging, Inc., Elm Grove, WI
Andrew Klein
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
Yang Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
Laura Glass Umfleet*
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
*
*Correspondence and reprint requests to: Laura Glass Umfleet. PsyD, ABPP-CN, Division of Neuropsychology, Department of Neurology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Rd., Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA. E-mail: lumfleet@mcw.edu

Abstract

Objectives:

Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) types may have distinct neuropathological substrates with hippocampal atrophy particularly common in amnestic MCI (aMCI). However, depending on the MCI classification criteria applied to the sample (e.g., number of abnormal test scores considered or thresholds for impairment), volumetric findings between MCI types may change. Additionally, despite increased clinical use, no prior research has examined volumetric differences in MCI types using the automated volumetric software, Neuroreader™.

Methods:

The present study separately applied the Petersen/Winblad and Jak/Bondi MCI criteria to a clinical sample of older adults (N = 82) who underwent neuropsychological testing and brain MRI. Volumetric data were analyzed using Neuroreader™ and hippocampal volumes were compared between aMCI and non-amnestic MCI (naMCI).

Results:

T-tests revealed that regardless of MCI classification criteria, hippocampal volume z-scores were significantly lower in aMCI compared to naMCI (p’s < .05), and hippocampal volume z-scores significantly differed from 0 (Neuroreader™ normative mean) in the aMCI group only (p’s < .05). Additionally, significant, positive correlations were found between measures of delayed recall and hippocampal z-scores in aMCI using either MCI classification criteria (p’s < .05).

Conclusions:

We provide evidence of correlated neuroanatomical changes associated with memory performance for two commonly used neuropsychological MCI classification criteria. Future research should investigate the clinical utility of hippocampal volumes analyzed via Neuroreader™ in MCI.

Information

Type
Regular Research
Copyright
Copyright © INS. Published by Cambridge University Press, 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable