Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-s74w7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-11T06:31:11.242Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Realising the Potential of Co-production: Negotiating Improvements in Public Services

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2008

Catherine Needham
Catherine Needham*
Affiliation:
Queen Mary, University of London E-mail: c.e.needham@qmul.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The concept of co-production – also called co-creation – is gaining widespread attention as a way to increase user involvement in service provision in the UK. It is usually taken as self-evident that more co-production will improve services. However, it is necessary to be clear about how far and in what ways co-production can improve public services. This article looks at the purported advantages of co-production, and considers how these can best be accessed. A case study workshop involving social housing users and providers, conducted as part of the National Consumer Council-Unison Shared Solutions project, is used to illustrate the need for collective dialogue and deliberation between co-producers rather than purely transactional forms of co-production.

Information

Type
Themed Section on Choice or voice
Information
Social Policy and Society , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , April 2008 , pp. 221 - 231
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Alford, J. (1998), ‘A public management road less travelled: clients as co-producers of public services’, Australian Journal of Public Administration, 57, 4, 128–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, M., Harrison, S., Mort, M., Shardlow, P. and Wistow, G. (1999), ‘The New Management of Community Care: User Groups, Citizenship and Co-production’, in Stoker, G. (ed.), The New Management of Local Governance Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Bovaird, T. forthcoming, ‘Beyond engagement and participation: user and community co-production of services’, Public Administration Review.Google Scholar
Brudney, J. L. (1984), ‘Local co-production of services and the analysis of municipal productivity’, Urban Affairs Quarterly, 19, 4, 465–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brudney, J. L. and England, R. E. (1983), ‘Towards a definition of the co-production concept’, Public Administration Review, 43, 1, 59–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, J. and Newman, J. (1997), The Managerial State, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Clarke, J., Cochrane, A. and Smart, C. (1987) Ideologies of Welfare: From Dreams to Disillusion, London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Cottam, H. and Leadbeater, C. (2006) Health: Co-Creating Outcomes, London: Design Council.Google Scholar
Garn, H., Flax, M., Springer, M. and Taylor, J. (1976), ‘Models for indicator development: a framework for policy analysis’, Urban Institute Paper 1206–17, The Urban Institute, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Halpern, D., Bates, C., Beales, G. and Heathfield, A. (2004), ‘Personal responsibility and changing behaviour', Strategy Unit, London, http://www.pm.gov.uk/files/pdf/pr.pdfGoogle Scholar
Hart, J. T. (2006), The Political Economy of Health Care: A Clinical Perspective, London: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
Hoggett, P. (1991), ‘A new management in the public sector?’, Policy and Politics, 19, 4, 243–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ilcan, S. and Basok, T. (2004), ‘Community governance: voluntary agencies, social justice and the responsibilization of citizens’, Citizenship Studies, 8, 2, 129–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joshi, A. and Moore, M. (2004), ‘Institutionalised co-production: unorthodox public service delivery in challenging environments’, Journal of Development Studies, 40, 4, 31–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, G., Mulgan, G. and Muers, S. (2002), ‘Creating public value: an analytical framework for public service reform’, Strategy Unit, London, http://www.strategy.gov.uk/downloads/files/public_value2.pdfGoogle Scholar
Kiser, L. L. (1984), ‘Toward an institutional theory of citizen co-production’, Urban Affairs Quarterly, 19, 4, 485–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawson, N. (2005), ‘Choice must not define what it means to be modern’, The Guardian, 2 September.Google Scholar
Leadbeater, C. (2004), Personalisation through Participation: A New Script for Public Services, London: Demos.Google Scholar
Lipsky, M. (1980), Street Level Bureaucracy, London: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
London Edinburgh Weekend Return Group (1979), In and Against the State, London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Miliband, E. (2007), Speech to Compass/Unison conference: ‘Voices of Real Reform’, London, 18 January.Google Scholar
Miller, D. (2000), Citizenship and National Identity, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Miller, C. and Stirling, S. (2004), Co-production in Children's Services, London: Office of Public Management.Google Scholar
Moore, M. (1995), Creating Public Value, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
National Consumer Council (NCC)/Unison (2006), Shared Solutions: Uniting Users and Staff in Public Service Improvement, London: NCC/Unison/Catalyst.Google Scholar
Needham, C. (2003), Citizen-Consumers: New Labour's Marketplace Democracy, London: Catalyst Forum.Google Scholar
Needham, C. (2006), ‘Coproduction in public services: opportunity or threat?’, Renewal, 14, 2, 55–60.Google Scholar
Needham, C. (2007), The Reform of Public Service under New Labour: Narratives of Consumerism, Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Offe, C. (1985), Disorganised Capitalism: Contemporary Transformations of Work and Politics, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Ostrom, V. (1989), The Intellectual Crisis in American Public Administration, London: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (1996), ‘Crossing the great divide: co-production, synergy, and development’, World Development, 24, 6, 1073–1087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, S. and Heapy, J. (2006), The Journey to the Interface: How Public Service Design Can Connect Users to Reform, London: Demos.Google Scholar
Parks, R. B., Baker, P. C., Kiser, L., Oakerson, R., Ostrom, E., Ostrom, V., Percy, S. L., Vandivort, M. B., Whitaker, G. P. and Wilson, R. (1981), ‘Consumers as co-producers of public services: some economic and institutional considerations’, Policy Studies Journal, 9, 7, 1001–1011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Percy, S. L. (1984), ‘Citizen participation in the co-production of urban services’, Urban Affairs Quarterly, 19, 4, 431–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Public Administration Select Committee (PASC) (2006), ‘Public services: putting people first? issues and questions paper’, November, http://www.parliament.uk/documents/upload/I%26Q%20Putting%20People%20First.docGoogle Scholar
Rich, R. C. (1981), ‘Interaction of the voluntary and governmental sectors: toward an understanding of the co-production of municipal services’, Administration and Society, 13, 59–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabatier, P. A. (1991), ‘Two decades of implementation research: from control to guidance and learning’, in Kaufmann, F.-X. (ed.), The Public Sector: Challenge for Coordination and Learning, New York/Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 257–270Google Scholar
Stoker, G. (1989), ‘Creating a local government for a post-Fordist society: the Thatcherite Project?’, in Stewart, J. and Stoker, G. (eds), The Future of Local Government, Basingstoke: Macmillan, pp. 141–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitaker, G. (1980), ‘Co-production: citizen participation in service delivery’, Public Administration Review, 40, 3, 240–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wirth, W. (1991), ‘Responding to citizens' needs: from bureaucratic accountability to individual co-production in the public sector’, in Kaufmann, F.X. (ed.), The Public Sector: Challenge for Coordination and Learning, New York/Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 69–85.Google Scholar
Zuboff, S. and Maxmin, J. (2003), The Support Economy: Why Corporations are Failing Individuals and the Next Episode of Capitalism, London: Allen Lane.CrossRefGoogle Scholar