Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Snyder, Scott
2008.
South Korean Strategic Thought toward Asia.
p.
77.
Article contents
The End of History, the Rise of Ideology, and the Future of Democracy on the Korean Peninsula
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 March 2016
Extract
Almost exactly a half-century following the outbreak of the Korean War, South Korea president Kim Dae-jung made a historic visit to Pyongyang for the first-ever summit meeting between the leaders of the two Koreas in June of 2000. A decade following the collapse of communism in the rest of the world, Kim's journey would inevitably be judged in history as a potential starting point for the end of inter-Korean confrontation. Three days following direct, broad-ranging discussions with his counterpart, Kim Jong Il, Kim Dae-jung confidently returned to Seoul with an inter-Korean summit declaration promising enhanced efforts at reconciliation and inter-Korean exchange. Upon his return to Seoul, Kim Dae-jung declared that there would be “no more war” on the Korean Peninsula. The next task was to institutionalize an array of exchanges and inter-Korean interactions designed eventually to lead to national reconciliation.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © East Asia Institute
References
Notes
The opinions expressed in this chapter are personal views and do not necessarily represent the views of The Asia Foundation. I would like to thank Ms. Eun Jung Cahill Che and Ms. Seon Yong Ban for providing research assistance in the preparation of this chapter.Google Scholar
1. Fukuyama, Francis, The End of History and the Last Man (New York: Avon Books, 1992). Fukuyama's original argument was presented in “The End of History,” National Interest 19 (summer 1989): 3–18.Google Scholar
2. In fact, some might argue that the rise of ideological divisions in South Korean politics over North Korea has occurred precisely because there has been no “end of history” on the Korean Peninsula.Google Scholar
3. Chong-Wook, Chong, “Has North Korea Really Changed?” Korea Focus 9, No. 3 (March–April 2001): 53.Google Scholar
4. The November 1996 edition of Wolgan Chosun included a series of articles describing the history of secret inter-Korean contacts. The theme of the issue may be seen as a not-so-subtle hint to then-president Kim Young Sam that such contacts have traditionally been regarded as an important means by which to enhance and assure security and avoid overheating in the inter-Korean relationship.Google Scholar
5. Kristof, Nicholas D., “South Korea's New President Appeals to North to End Decades of Division,” New York Times, February 25, 1998, p. 8.Google Scholar
6. Available public opinion polling used in this article comes from a variety of sources, and their questions may be intended to elicit differing responses, depending on the relative positions reflected by the polls' sponsors. Generally speaking, the Ministry of National Unification has sought to put a positive spin on public support for the Sunshine Policy, whereas other sources may be regarded as more critical. For this reason, the author has tried to provide detailed information on the questions that were asked in the polls as part of reporting on the variety of public polling data that he was able to uncover. To the extent possible, the same polling sources have been used over time to demonstrate fluctuations in public response. The analysis of the polls is designed more to discern trends, in combination with editorial content analysis, also designed to reveal opinions across the political spectrum. As reported by Chosun Ilbo (Digital Chosun), February 27, 1998.Google Scholar
7. “S-N Governmental Meeting,” Korea Times, April 7, 1998, p. 6.Google Scholar
8. “Another Submarine,” Chosun Ilbo (Internet edition) in English, June 23, 1998. As reported in FBIS Doc. No. FTS19989623001346.Google Scholar
9. Chosun Ilbo (Digital Chosun), June 29, 1998, August 19, 1998.Google Scholar
10. “Sunshine Policy, Again,” Chosun Ilbo (Internet edition) in English, December 18, 1998. As reported in FBIS Doc. No. SK1812134798.Google Scholar
11. Chosun Ilbo (Digital Chosun), December 21, 1998.Google Scholar
12. “Inter-Korean Dialogue Cannot Be Delayed Further,” Chungang Ilbo (Internet version) in Korean, February 24, 1999. From FBIS Doc. No. SK2702122199.Google Scholar
13. “Preconditions for Summit,” Donga Ilbo (Internet version) in Korean, May 6, 1999. From FBIS Doc. No. SK0705093999.Google Scholar
14. “The Sunshine Argument,” Chosun Ilbo (Internet version) in English, June 18, 1999. From FBIS Doc. No. SK1806135899.Google Scholar
15. One thousand people were surveyed from 13:30 to 21:30 on September 18 by Union Research (available online at www.union.re.kr/board/view.php?id=news&page=2&sn1=&divpage=1&sn=off&ss=on&sc=on&select_arrange=headnum&desc=asc&no=20).Google Scholar
16. Grand National Party president Lee Hoi Chang, “Remarks Made by Grand National Party President Lee Hoi Chang at a Press Conference in Seoul, June 19, 2000, on the Outcome of the Recent Summit Meeting Between South and North Korea” (as posted on the GNP website: www.hannaradang.or.kr).Google Scholar
17. Chang, Lee Hoi, “Toward Peace and Unification of the Korean Peninsula,” Korea Times, November 1, 2000.Google Scholar
18. Gil, Han Mann, “Role of Education in National Unification,” Korea Focus 9, No. 2 (March–April 2001): 133–146.Google Scholar
19. Young-bin, Kwon, “Rational Policy on North Korea Desired: Transform Emotional North Korea Policies to Sustainable Cool-headed Approach,” Chungang Ilbo (Internet version) in English, October 28, 2000. FBIS Doc. No. KPP200001028000027.Google Scholar
20. Donga Ilbo, May 31; June 15, as cited in Lee Geun, “Political and Economic Consequences of the Inter-Korean Summit,” presented at the 2001 KAIS International Conference, June 22–23, 2001, p. 11.Google Scholar
21. Han, , Korea Focus, p. 134.Google Scholar
22. Tong-hyon, Yi, “Reporter's Note: North Korea Policy Should Stick to Principles,” JoongAng Ilbo (Internet version) in Korean, January 2, 2001, FBIS Doc. No. KPP20010102000094. Gallup Poll Survey on Political Support, December 26, 2000.Google Scholar
23. Chung-kun, Yi, “57% Support ‘Sunshine Policy’ … [Support] on Slow Decline,” Kyonghyang Sinmun (Internet version) in Korean, October 5, 2000. FBIS Doc. No. KPP200001006000004.Google Scholar
24. Cha'ng-chung, Yun, “Kim Chong-il's Visit to South Korea Should Be Realized in the New Year,” Munhwa Ilbo (in Korean), December 29, 2000. FBIS Doc. No. KPP20001229000047.Google Scholar
25. Geun, Lee, “Political and Economic Consequences,” p. 11.Google Scholar
26. “One Year On,” Chosun Ilbo (Internet version) in English, June 14, 2001. FBIS Doc. No. KPP20010615000009.Google Scholar
27. Yong-nae, Pak, “50 Percent of Respondents Say ‘President Kim Is Not Doing a Good Job,’” Kyonghyang Sinmun (Internet version) in Korean, October 7, 2001. FBIS Doc. No. KPP20011008000020.Google Scholar
28. Poll conducted by the Korea Research Center and Ministry of Unification, “Public Opinion Poll Regarding Engagement Policy Toward North Korea,” September 24, 2001.Google Scholar
29. “Don't Worry, Be Happy?” Chungang Ilbo (Internet version) in English, February 3, 2002. FBIS Doc. No. KPP200203000053.Google Scholar
30. Korea, Gallup (available online at panel.gallup.co.kr/svcdb/recent_content.asp?objSN=20020203009).Google Scholar
31. Chosun Ilbo and Gallup Korea. Random sample of 1,011 adults over age 20 surveyed over the phone on July 6 (available online at www.gallup.co.kr/News/2002/release076.html).Google Scholar
32. Yong-nim, Hong, “Chosun Ilbo-Gallup Public Opinion Survey—63 Percent Believe ‘Funds Transferred to North Korea Were Compensation for [North-South] Summit,’” Chosun Ilbo (Internet version), in Korean, February 6, 2003. FBIS Doc. No. KPP20030205000022 Google Scholar
33. Fukuyama, , “The End of History? As Our Mad Century Closes, We Find the Universal State,” Washington Post, July 30, 1989, p. C1.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by