Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-5mwv9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-18T14:46:50.669Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - ETHICAL AND POLITICAL ISSUES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Paul S. Gray ,
John B. Williamson ,
David A. Karp  and
John R. Dalphin
Paul S. Gray
Affiliation:
Boston College, Massachusetts
John B. Williamson
Affiliation:
Boston College, Massachusetts
David A. Karp
Affiliation:
Boston College, Massachusetts
John R. Dalphin
Affiliation:
Merrimack College, Massachusetts
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The first four chapters of this book set the stage for learning about research by introducing you to a vocabulary that specifies the various parts of the process and presenting the basics of research design and measurement. These chapters are a foundation for investigating the social world. However, before the various methods are presented in detail, this chapter summarizes the ethical and political context for research.

Growing up, many of us have been taught to abide by the Golden Rule in church, school, and community. Social researchers, however virtuous they may be in a personal sense, are concerned about ethical behavior in a more specific context. Because of the public nature of science and the increasing visibility and accountability of researchers, they must pay attention to ethical principles or suffer the criticism of those who read their work and who provide them with data. As we will see in this chapter, in research, doing the “right thing” is not always easy or obvious!

Suppose that a team of politically moderate social scientists has received a research grant from the federal government to investigate political extremism on both the left and the right in America. The researchers will interview members of the Communist Party and the American Nazi Party to find out what their attitudes are on a variety of political and social issues.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Research Imagination
An Introduction to Qualitative and Quantitative Methods
 , pp. 81 - 100
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bechtel, H. Kenneth, and Pearson, Willie. 1985. “Deviant Scientists and Scientific Deviance.” Deviant Behavior 6:237–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Howard S. 1971. “Whose Side Are We On?” In Sociological Work, 15–25. Howard, S. Becker, ed. Chicago: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bell, Robert. 1992. Impure Science: Fraud, Compromise, and Political Influence in Scientific Research. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Hamilton, James C. 1999. “The Ethics of Conducting Social Science Research on the Internet.” Chronicle of Higher Education 46 (15): B6–B7.Google ScholarPubMed
Hammersley, Martyn. 2000. Taking Sides in Social Research: Partisanship and Bias in Social Enquiry. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
King, Nancy M. P., and Jane, Stein, eds. 1999. Beyond Regulations: Ethics in Human Subjects Research. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Resnick, David. 1998. The Ethics of Science: An Introduction. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Reverby, Susan M., ed. 2000. Tuskegee's Truth: Rethinking the Tuskegee Syphilis Study. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Shamoo, Adil E., and David, B. Resnik. 2006. Responsible Conduct of Research. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sieber, Joan E., and James, M. Dubois, eds. 2005. Using Our Best Judgment in Conducting Human Research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1917/1968. The Methodology of the Social Sciences. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
American Psychological Association. 2002. Code of Ethics.
American Sociological Association. 2005. Code of Ethics.
Applied Research Ethics National Association (ARENA). 2005.
Indiana University Workshop on Teaching Research Ethics. 2005. Teaching Research Ethics: Annotated Bibliography.
National Council on Ethics in Human Research (Canada). 2004.
National Library of Medicine. 2005. Finding Aid to the Documents on the Origin and Development of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study, 1921–1973.
Qualidata. 2005. ESRC Qualitative Data, Archival Resource Centre, Department of Sociology, University of Essex, Colchester, UK.
American Psychological Association. 2002. Code of Ethics.
American Sociological Association. 2005. Code of Ethics.
Applied Research Ethics National Association (ARENA). 2005.
Indiana University Workshop on Teaching Research Ethics. 2005. Teaching Research Ethics: Annotated Bibliography.
National Council on Ethics in Human Research (Canada). 2004.
National Library of Medicine. 2005. Finding Aid to the Documents on the Origin and Development of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study, 1921–1973.
Qualidata. 2005. ESRC Qualitative Data, Archival Resource Centre, Department of Sociology, University of Essex, Colchester, UK.
American Psychological Association. 2002. Code of Ethics.
American Sociological Association. 2005. Code of Ethics.
Applied Research Ethics National Association (ARENA). 2005.
Indiana University Workshop on Teaching Research Ethics. 2005. Teaching Research Ethics: Annotated Bibliography.
National Council on Ethics in Human Research (Canada). 2004.
National Library of Medicine. 2005. Finding Aid to the Documents on the Origin and Development of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study, 1921–1973.
Qualidata. 2005. ESRC Qualitative Data, Archival Resource Centre, Department of Sociology, University of Essex, Colchester, UK.
American Psychological Association. 2002. Code of Ethics.
American Sociological Association. 2005. Code of Ethics.
Applied Research Ethics National Association (ARENA). 2005.
Indiana University Workshop on Teaching Research Ethics. 2005. Teaching Research Ethics: Annotated Bibliography.
National Council on Ethics in Human Research (Canada). 2004.
National Library of Medicine. 2005. Finding Aid to the Documents on the Origin and Development of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study, 1921–1973.
Qualidata. 2005. ESRC Qualitative Data, Archival Resource Centre, Department of Sociology, University of Essex, Colchester, UK.
Altman, Ellen, and Hernon, Peter, eds. 1997. Research Misconduct: Issues, Implications, and Strategies. Greenwich, CT: Ablex.Google Scholar
Barnes, Deborah E., and Bero, Lisa A.. 1996. “Industry-funded Research and Conflict of Interest: An Analysis of Research Sponsored by the Tobacco Industry through the Center for Indoor Air Research.” Journal of Health, Politics, Policy and Law 21 (3): 515.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baumrind, Diana. 1985. “Research Using Intentional Deception.” American Psychologist 40 (2): 165–174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Becker, Howard S. 1971. “Whose Side Are We On?” In Sociological Work, 15–25. Howard, S. Becker, ed. Chicago: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bell, Robert. 1992. Impure Science: Fraud, Compromise, and Political Influence in Scientific Research. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Blaney, Joseph R., and Benoit, William L.. 2001. The Clinton Scandals and the Politics of Image Restoration. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Bulmer, Martin, ed. 1982. Social Research Ethics: An Examination of the Merits of Covert Participant Observation. New York: Holmes & Meier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, TeresaDaza, Isabelle, and Slaughter, Sheila. 1999. “University-Industry Relationships: An Empirical View.” In Perspectives on Scholarly Misconduct in the Sciences, 259–282. Braxton, John M., ed. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Chastain, Garvin, and Landrum, R. Eric, eds. 1999. Protecting Human Subjects: Departmental Subject Pools and Institutional Review Boards. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clawson, Dan, Neustadtl, Alan, and Weller, Mark. 1998. Dollars and Votes: How Business Campaign Contributions Subvert Democracy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Cook, Gareth, and Bombardieri, Marcella. 2005. “MIT Professor Is Fired over Fabricated Data.” Boston Globe, October 28, 268 (120).Google Scholar
Corti, Louise. 2000. Legal and Ethical Issues in Interviewing Children: Advice for Researchers Archiving Data. ESRC Qualitative Data Archival Resource Centre, Department of Sociology, University of Essex, Colchester, UK.Google Scholar
Fraser, Sandy, et al., eds. 2004. Doing Research with Children and Young People. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Galliher, John F. 1995. “Chicago's Two Worlds of Deviance Research: Whose Side Are They On?” In A Second Chicago School? The Development of Postwar American Sociology, 164–187. Fine, Gary Alan, ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1986. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gouldner, Alvin W. 1973. For Sociology: Renewal and Critique in Sociology Today. Hammondsworth, UK: Penguin.Google Scholar
Hammersley, Martyn. 2000. Taking Sides in Social Research: Partisanship and Bias in Social Enquiry. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Gordon. 1989. Pornography in a Free Society. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, Laud. 1975. Tearoom Trade. Chicago: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
IRBMED. 2005. “Informed Consent Templates.” University of Michigan Medical School.
Karp, David A. 1996. Speaking of Sadness: Depression, Disconnection, and the Meanings of Illness. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kevles, Daniel J. 2000. The Baltimore Case: A Trial of Politics, Science, and Character. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Koocher, Gerald P., and Keith-Spiegel, Patricia. 1998. Ethics in Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lafree, Gary. 2000. Losing Legitimacy: Street Crime and the Decline of Social Institutions in America. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Leo, Richard A. 2001. “Trial and Tribulations: Courts, Ethnography, and the Need for an Evidentiary Privilege for Academic Researchers.” In Contemporary Field Research, Chapter 12. 2nd ed. Emerson, Robert M., ed. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, Charles, and Allison, Bill. 2001. The Cheating of America: How Tax Avoidance and Evasion by the Super Rich Are Costing the Country Billions, and What You Can Do About It. New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar
Milgram, Stanley. 1973. Obedience to Authority. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Miller, David J., and Hersen, Michel, eds. 1992. Research Fraud in the Behavioral and Biomedical Sciences. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Nagel, Ernest. 1979. The Structure of Science. 2nd ed. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
National Institutes of Health (NIH). 2000. “Financial Conflicts of Interest and Research Objectivity: Issues for Investigators and Institutional Review Boards.” NIH Guide Archive. Title 42, volume 1, parts 1–399. June 5.
National Library of Medicine. 2001. Current Bibliographies in Medicine, 99–3.
Newell, J. David. 1994. “The Case for Deception in Medical Experimentation.” In Ethical Issues in Scientific Research: An Anthology, 141–154. Erwin, Edward, Gendin, Sidney, and Kleiman, Lowell, eds. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Newman, Robin M. 1999. “Subject Consent Form for Participation of Human Subjects in Research.” Institutional Review Board for the Protection of Human Subjects. University of Wisconsin, River Falls.Google Scholar
Rainwater, Lee, and Pittman, David J.. 1967. “Ethical Problems in Studying a Politically Sensitive and Deviant Community.” Social Problems 14 (Spring): 357–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringer, Fritz K. 1998. Max Weber's Methodology: The Unification of the Cultural and Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Robert. 1994. “Interpersonal Expectancy Effects: A 30-Year Perspective.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 3:176–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scarce, Rik. 1995. “Scholarly Ethics and Courtroom Antics: Where Researchers Stand in the Eyes of the Law.” American Sociologist 26 (1): 87–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, Yolanda M. 2001. Fear of Crime among Inner-City African Americans. New York: LFB Scholarly Publications.Google Scholar
Shichor, David. 2001. Readings in White-Collar Crime. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
Sieber, Joan E. 1992. Planning Ethically Responsible Research: A Guide for Students and Internal Review Boards. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, Barbara H., Sieber, Joan E., and Melton, Gary B., eds. 1996. Research Ethics – A Psychological Approach. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Thorne, Barrie. 1980. “You Still Takin' Notes? Fieldwork and Problems of Informed Consent.” Social Problems 27 (3) February: 284–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaughan, Diane. 1997. The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture, and Deviance at NASA. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vidich, Arthur J., and Bensman, Joseph. 1958. Small Town in Mass Society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1958. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. Gerth, Hans H. and Mills, C. Wright, eds. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yen, Hope. 2004. “9/11 Commission: No Link between Al-Qaida and Saddam.” Associated Press, June 16.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×